Convenciones y disrupciones en la cobertura de los eventos políticos en la TV lineal y social. Análisis de la noche de las elecciones del 26M de 2019
- Ana-Isabel Rodríguez-Vázquez 1
- Alba Silva-Rodríguez 1
- Sabela Direito-Rebollal 1
- Berta García-Orosa 1
- 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación)
ISSN: 1386-6710, 1699-2407
Ano de publicación: 2020
Título do exemplar: Televisión: programas, audiencias y debates / Television: programmes, audiences, and debates
Volume: 29
Número: 2
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: El profesional de la información
Resumo
Mediante un método mixto se analiza la oferta lineal (en directo), social (redes sociales) y de participación de la audiencia (live-tweeting) durante el especial informativo de la noche electoral del 26 de mayo de 2019 (comicios europeos, autonómicos y municipales) en La 1 de TVE y La sexta. Se parte de la hipótesis de que el consumo de televisión ha cambiado con la competencia de las plataformas de visionado a la carta. El objetivo de este trabajo empírico es determinar la estrategia informativa multicanal llevada a cabo por las citadas emisoras y conocer la respuesta de la audiencia. Eventos políticos como los procesos electorales mantienen a la audiencia conectada con la televisión tradicional y la social, y generan altos volúmenes de conversación.
Información de financiamento
Este artículo se ha elaborado en el marco del proyecto Cibermedios nativos digitales en España: formatos narrativos y estrategia móvil (RTI2018-093346-B-C33), del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, cofinancia-do por el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (Feder).La autora Sabela Direito-Rebollal es beneficiaria del programa para la Formación del Profesorado Universitario del Ministerio de Universidades (Gobierno de España).Financiadores
-
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Spain
- RTI2018-093346-B-C33
-
Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional
- RTI2018-093346-B-C33
Referencias bibliográficas
- Abitbol, Alan; Lee, Sun-Young (2017). “Messages on CSR-dedicated Facebook pages: What works and what doesn’t”. Public relations review, v. 43, n. 4, pp. 796-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.002
- Alonso-González, Marián (2018). “Infoentretenimiento y política: el caso de las elecciones de 2015 y 2016 en España”. Revista de comunicación de la Seeci, n. 44, pp. 87-113. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2017.44.87-113
- Azurmendi, Ana (2018): “Reconectar con la audiencia joven. Narrativa transmedia para la transformación de la televisión de servicio público en España, Francia, Alemania y Reino Unido”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 73, pp. 927-944. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1289
- Blondel, Vincent D.; Guillaume, Jean-Loup; Lambiotte, Renaud; Lefebvre, Etienne (2008). “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks”. Journal of statistical mechanics: Theory and experiment, v. 2008, n. 10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
- Bruns, Axel; Burgess, Jean E. (2011). “The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics”. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) general conference. University of Iceland, Reykjavik. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515
- Burnet, Simon; Bloice, Lyndsay (2016). “Linking for influence: Twitter linked content in the Scottish referendum televised debates”. Journal of information science, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 396-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515624355
- Comscore (2019). Beyond the headlines. Unpacking common narratives in media and advertising. https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2019/Beyond-the-Headlines-Unpacking-Common-Narratives-in-Media-and-Advertising
- Cha, Jiyoung (2016). “Television use in the 21st century: An exploration of television and social television use in a multiplatform enviroment”. First Monday, v. 21, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i2.6112
- Chadwick, Andrew (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 199759484
- Congosto, María-Luz; Aragón, Pablo (2012). “Twitter, del sondeo a la sonda: nuevos canales de opinión, nuevos métodos de análisis”. Más poder local, n. 12, pp. 50-56.
- Dodd, Melissa; Collins, Steve (2017). “Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts”. Public relations review, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004
- Gallego, Francisco (2013): “Social TV analytics: Nuevas métricas para una nueva forma de ver televisión”. Index.comunicación: Revista científica de comunicación aplicada, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 13-39. http://journals.sfu.ca/indexcomunicacion/index.php/indexcomunicacion/article/view/49
- Gálvez-Rodríguez, María-del-Mar; Caba-Pérez, Carmen; López-Godoy, Manuel (2014). “Facebook: A new communication strategy for non-profit organisations in Colombia”. Public relations review, v. 40, n. 5, pp. 868-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.002
- Gálvez-Rodríguez, María-del-Mar; Sáez-Martín, Alejandro; García-Tabuyo, Manuela; Caba-Pérez, Carmen (2018). “Exploring dialogic strategies in social media for fostering citizens’ interactions with Latin American local governments”. Public relations review, v. 44, n. 2, pp. 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.03.003
- García-Orosa, Berta; López-García, Xosé (2019). “Language in social networks as a communication strategy: Public administration, political parties and civil society”. Communication & society, v. 32, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.107-125
- Grčić, Klara; Babac, Marina-Bagić; Podobnik, Vedran (2017). “Generating politician profiles based on content analysis of social network datasets”. Journal of universal computer science, v. 23, n. 3, p. 236-255. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-023-03-0236
- Harrington, Stephen; Highfield, Tim; Bruns, Axel (2013). “More than a backchannel: Twitter and television”. Participations. Journal of audience & reception studies, v. 10, n. 1. http://snurb.info/files/2014/More%20than%20a%20Backchannel.pdf
- Hawthorne, Joshua; Houston, J. Brian; McKinney, Mitchell S. (2013). “Live-tweeting a presidential primary debate: Exploring new political conversations”. Social science computer review, v. 31, n. 5, pp. 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490643
- Haythornthwaite, Caroline (1996). “Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange”. Library & information science research, v. 18, n. 4, pp. 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1
- Himelboim, Itai; Smith, Marc A.; Rainie, Lee; Shneiderman, Ben; Espina, Camila (2017). “Classifying Twitter topic-networks using social network analysis”. Social media + society, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545
- Ji, Yi-Grace; Chen, Zifei-Fay; Tao, Weiting; Li, Zongchao-Cathy (2018). “Functional and emotional traits of corporate social media message strategies: Behavioral insights from S&P 500 Facebook data”. Public relations review, v. 45, n. 1, pp. 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.001
- Jungherr, Andreas (2016). “Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review”. Journal of information technology & politics, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
- Jürgens, Pascal; Jungherr, Andreas (2015). “The use of Twitter during the 2009 German national election”. German politics, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2015.1116522
- Larsson, Anders-Olof; Moe, Hallvard (2012). “Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign”. New media & society, v. 14, n. 5, pp. 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894
- Lin, Yu-Ru; Keegan, Brian; Margolin, Drew; Lazer, David (2014). “Rising tides or rising stars?: Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events”. PLoS one, v. 9, n. 5, e94093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094093
- Liu, Wenlin; Lai, Chih-Hui; Xu, Weiai Wayne (2018). “Tweeting about emergency: A semantic network analysis of government organizations’ social media messaging during hurricane Harvey”. Public relations review, v. 44, n. 5, pp. 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.009
- Livingstone, Sonia; Lunt, Peter (1994). “The mass media, democracy and the public sphere”. In: Livingstone, Sonia; Lunt, Peter. Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. Londres: Routledge, pp. 9-35. ISBN: 978 0 415077385 http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Talk-on-TV-ch-2-for-eprint.pdf
- López-Rabadán, Pablo; Mellado, Claudia (2019). “Twitter as a space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media”. Communication & society, v. 32, n. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.1-18
- Masip, Pere; Ruiz-Caballero, Carlos; Suau, Jaume (2019). “Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 2, e280204. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.04
- Orihuela, José-Luis (2011). Mundo Twitter. Barcelona: Alienta. ISBN: 978 84 92414895
- Ott, Larissa; Theunissen, Petra (2015). “Reputations at risk: Engagement during social media crises”. Public relations review, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.015
- Painter, David-Lynn (2015). “Online political public relations and trust: Source and interactivity effects in the 2012 US presidential campaign”. Public relations review, v. 41, n. 5, pp. 801-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.012
- Pedersen, Sarah; Baxter, Graeme; Burnett, Simon; Goker, Ayse; Corney, David; Martin, Carlos (2015). “Backchannel chat: Peaks and troughs in a Twitter response to three televised debates during the 2014 Scottish independence referendum campaign”. In: Parycek, P.; Edelmann, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the 2015 International conference for e-democracy and open government (CeDEM15), 20-22 May Krems, Austria, pp. 105-117. https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/246360
- Saavedra-Llamas, Marta; Rodríguez-Fernández, Leticia; Barón-Dulce, Gema (2016). “Audiencia social en España: Estrategias de éxito en la televisión nacional”. Icono 14, v. 13, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v13i2.822
- Shah, Dhavan V.; Culver, Kathleen-Bartzen; Hanna, Alexander; Macafee, Timothy; Yang, JungHwan (2015). “Computational approaches to online political expression: Rediscovering a ‘science of the social’”. In: Coleman, Stephen; Freelon, Deen (eds.). Handbook of digital politics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 281-305. ISBN: 978 1 782548751
- Shamma, David A.; Kennedy, Lyndon; Churchill, Elizabeth F. (2009). “Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources”. In: Proceedings of the first Sigmm Workshop on social media. https://doi.org/10.1145/1631144.1631148
- Spyridou, Lia-Paschalia (2018). “Analyzing the active audience: Reluctant, reactive, fearful, or lazy? Forms and motives of participation in mainstream journalism”. Journalism, v. 20, n. 6, pp. 827-847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918784733
- Taylor, Maureen; Kent, Michael L. (2010). “Anticipatory socialization in the use of social media in public relations: A content analysis of PRSA’s public relations tactics”. Public relations review, v. 36, n. 3, pp. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.04.012
- Utz, Sonja; Schultz, Friederike; Glocka, Sandra (2013). “Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster”. Public relations review, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.010
- Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia (2012). “Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook”. Public relations review, v. 38, n. 3, pp. 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010
- Wasserman, Stanley; Faust, Katherine (2013). Análisis de redes sociales: métodos y aplicaciones. Madrid: CIS. ISBN: 978 84 74766318
- Waters, Richard D.; Jamal, Jia Y. (2011). “Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates”. Public relations review, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002