Directives in Latin comedy: Pragmatics, dramatic role and social status
ISSN: 2194-8739, 2194-8747
Ano de publicación: 2016
Volume: 15
Número: 2
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Journal of Latin Linguistics
Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable
Resumo
This paper analyzes directive expressions in Plautus’s Curculio, a comedy with unusual characteristics. The analysis takes into account the social status of those characters who give and receive directive expressions, as well as their gender and the pragmatic situations which the dramatic context affords them. As a means of explaining the findings here, a distinction is drawn between various subtypes of speech acts according to the degree of obligation required in terms of compliance with the orders given. Also, we will attempt to assess the extent to which it is possible to associate a specific type of modality (impressive, declarative, interrogative) with the coding of orders involving a greater or lesser degree of obligation of compliance. The analysis confirms earlier findings on the existence of an interaction in this comedy between pragmatic, dramatic and sociolinguistic aspects in the expression of directives.
Referencias bibliográficas
- (1984), Antichthon, 18, pp. 43, 10.1017/S0066477400003142
- (1965), Classical Quarterly, 15, pp. 84, 10.1017/S0009838800008739
- (2010), Gender, social status, and discourse in Roman comedy
- (2005), Omnibus, 49, pp. 3
- (2015), Minerva, 28, pp. 133
- (2004), Registros lingüísticos en las lenguas clásicas, pp. 11
- (2016a), Glotta, 92, pp. 18, 10.13109/glot.2016.92.1.18
- (2004), Registros lingüísticos en las lenguas clásicas, pp. 11
- (Forthcoming), Pragmatics in Latin and ancient Greek
- (1993), Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin: A study in the pragmatics of a dead language
- (2014), Rheinische Museum, 157, pp. 272
- (2005), Terence and the language of the Roman comedy
- (2016b), Mnemosyne, 69, pp. 628, 10.1163/1568525X-12341827
- (1995), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, 8, pp. 19
- (2008), Latin Vulgaire – Latin tardif VIII, pp. 69
- (2011b), Plautus. The Merchant. The Braggart Soldier. The Ghost. The Persian
- (2009), La petición verbal en latín. Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático
- (1993), Plautus’ Curculio
- (2012a), Laws and rules in Indo-European, pp. 313
- (2005), Terence and the language of the Roman comedy
- (1962), T. Maccius Plautus: Curculio. Plaute: Charançon. Édition, introduction et commentaire
- (2009), La petición verbal en latín. Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático
- (2003), Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates VI: Casina, pp. 137
- (1998), Language and gender: A reader, pp. 100
- (2011a), Plautus. Casina. The casket comedy. Curculio. Epidicus. The two Menaechmuses
- (2005), Classical Quarterly, 55, pp. 582, 10.1093/cq/bmi052
- (2012), Gender and speech in Roman comedy. CAMWS Talk (31/03/2012)
- (2003), Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates VI: Casina, pp. 137
- (2004), Registros lingüísticos en las lenguas clásicas, pp. 269
- (2002), Latin forms of address: From Plautus to Apuleius
- (2015), How to command and request in Menander
- (1993), Plautus’ Curculio
- (2012), Ce que les femmes se disent entre elles: les duos féminins dans la comédie romaine. Mondes Anciennes, 3, pp. 2
- (2010), Revista de Estudios Latinos, 10, pp. 49
- (2010), Revista de Estudios Latinos, 10, pp. 49
- (2002), Latin forms of address: From Plautus to Apuleius
- (2016a), Glotta, 92, pp. 18, 10.13109/glot.2016.92.1.18
- (2016b), Mnemosyne, 69, pp. 628, 10.1163/1568525X-12341827
- (2015), Minerva, 28, pp. 133
- (1996), Pragmatics, 6, pp. 167, 10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
- (2008), (Oxford Studies in Classical Literature and Gender Theory)
- (2010), Gender, social status, and discourse in Roman comedy
- (1995), Florentia Iliberritana, 6, pp. 347
- (1979), Linguistic differentiation of character type and sex in the comedies of Plautus and Terence
- (1984), Antichthon, 18, pp. 43, 10.1017/S0066477400003142
- (1993), Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin: A study in the pragmatics of a dead language
- (1989), Persa. Classical Quarterly, 39, pp. 390, 10.1017/S0009838800037459
- (2015), How to command and request in Menander
- (2012b), Classical Quarterly, 62, pp. 731, 10.1017/S0009838812000286
- (2012a), Laws and rules in Indo-European, pp. 313
- (1938), Classical Philology, 33, pp. 267, 10.1086/362137
- (2005), Omnibus, 49, pp. 3
- (2012), Gender and speech in Roman comedy. CAMWS Talk (31/03/2012)
- (1962), T. Maccius Plautus: Curculio. Plaute: Charançon. Édition, introduction et commentaire
- (Forthcoming), Pragmatics in Latin and ancient Greek
- (1976), A comparative study of the language of Plautus and Terence
- (1995), Florentia Iliberritana, 6, pp. 347
- (2012b), Classical Quarterly, 62, pp. 731, 10.1017/S0009838812000286
- (2013), Memento moriThe use(s) of the future imperative in the Carmina Latina Epigraphica, pp. 193
- (2014), Rheinische Museum, 157, pp. 272
- (2010), rogo, quaeso. Journal of Latin Linguistics, 11, pp. 181
- (1998), Elements of everyday language in Terence and the use of this language as a means of differentiation in the speeches of his characters
- (1980), American Journal of Philology, 101, pp. 180, 10.2307/294426
- (2011a), Plautus. Casina. The casket comedy. Curculio. Epidicus. The two Menaechmuses
- (Forthcoming), Linguistic interaction in Roman comedy
- (2010), rogo, quaeso. Journal of Latin Linguistics, 11, pp. 181
- (1965), Classical Quarterly, 15, pp. 84, 10.1017/S0009838800008739
- (2011b), Plautus. The Merchant. The Braggart Soldier. The Ghost. The Persian
- (2008), (Oxford Studies in Classical Literature and Gender Theory)
- (1976), A comparative study of the language of Plautus and Terence
- (2008), Latin Vulgaire – Latin tardif VIII, pp. 69
- (1995), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, 8, pp. 19
- (1980), American Journal of Philology, 101, pp. 180, 10.2307/294426
- (2013), Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach
- (1979), Linguistic differentiation of character type and sex in the comedies of Plautus and Terence
- (Forthcoming), Linguistic interaction in Roman comedy
- (1996), Pragmatics, 6, pp. 167, 10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
- (1998), Elements of everyday language in Terence and the use of this language as a means of differentiation in the speeches of his characters
- (1938), Classical Philology, 33, pp. 267, 10.1086/362137
- (2013), Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach
- (2013), Memento moriThe use(s) of the future imperative in the Carmina Latina Epigraphica, pp. 193
- (1979), Classical Philology, 74, pp. 136, 10.1086/366487
- (2005), Classical Quarterly, 55, pp. 582, 10.1093/cq/bmi052
- (1998), Language and gender: A reader, pp. 100
- (1979), Classical Philology, 74, pp. 136, 10.1086/366487
- (2012), Ce que les femmes se disent entre elles: les duos féminins dans la comédie romaine. Mondes Anciennes, 3, pp. 2
- (1989), Persa. Classical Quarterly, 39, pp. 390, 10.1017/S0009838800037459
- (2004), Registros lingüísticos en las lenguas clásicas, pp. 269