Variables bibliométricas relacionadas con el número de citas por artículo según los indicadores Wos y Scopus para la Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

  1. Andrés Mauricio Caviedes-Castro
  2. Andrea Velandia Morales
  3. Claudia Caycedo Espinel
  4. Aldo Hernández Barrios
  5. Marithza Sandoval-Escobar
  6. Pablo Vallejo-Medina
Libro:
Proceedings del XI Foro Internacional sobre Evaluación de la Calidad de la Investigación y de la Educación Superior (8-10 de Julio 2014. Bilbao-España)
  1. Gualberto Buela-Casal (dir.)
  2. Tamara Ramiro-Sánchez (coord.)

Editorial: Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual AEPC

ISBN: 978-84-608-7206-1

Ano de publicación: 2015

Páxinas: 13-16

Congreso: FECIES. Foro sobre la Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación Superior y de la Investigación (11. 2014. Bilbao)

Tipo: Achega congreso

Resumo

This work aim was to see what variables are related to the articles citation. For this, a total of 111 items (in the semi-observation peiod2011-2013) published in the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología were evaluated. The following independent variables were considered: number of authors, language of publication, if matched, or not, a monographic edition, the document length (in pages) and the subject area of psychology in which the area according to UNESCO classification. The dependent variables were the number of citations received WOS and Scopus. The process responds to the creation of a database in SPSS where all articles published in the last semi-observation period, where all the above variables were recorded. The results showed significant differences depending of the number of authors (more quotes when more than 4 authors), the monographic edition (less articles cited monographs) and the type of item according to the areas of UNESCO. The results are interpreted and the implications there of are discussed.