Integrar el Pensamiento Crítico en la Educación Científica en la Era de la Post-verdad

  1. Blanca Puig Mauriz 1
  2. Paloma Blanco Anaya 1
  3. Inés M.Bargiela 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias

ISSN: 1697-011X

Ano de publicación: 2023

Volume: 20

Número: 3

Páxinas: 3301

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.25267/REV_EUREKA_ENSEN_DIVULG_CIENC.2023.V20.I3.3301 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias

Resumo

Critical thinking is an essential component of scientific literacy that has raised its importance in the Post-truth Era. Investing efforts in developing teaching designs for the practice of critical thinking is a main goal of current research in science education. This article suggests integrating a critical thinking teaching approach that involves action in which elements of the practice and metacognition combine. Based on the results of a project on critical thinking in science instruction, we present: 1) an analysis of the different views/conceptions of critical thinking and their teaching implications; 2) arguments for critical thinking development in contexts related to post-truth era and the main challenges; 3) our vision about critical thinking instruction and key points for its application in the classroom; 4) an example of design for the practice of critical thinking developed as a result of the joint work of researchers and secondary school teachers

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albe, V. (2007). Students’ Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-Scientific Issue. En: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_30
  • Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., y Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655038
  • Bargiela, I., Blanco Anaya, P., y Puig, B. (2022). Las preguntas para la indagación y activación de Pensamiento Crítico en Educación Infantil. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 40(3), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.5470.
  • Crujeiras, B. y Jiménez Aleixandre, M. P. (2012). Participar en las prácticas científicas: aprender sobre la ciencia diseñando un experimento sobre pasta de dientes. Alambique, 72, 12-19.
  • Benderson, A. (1990). Critical thinking: Critical issues. Educational Testing Service.
  • Boudry, M., Blancke, S., y Pigliucci, M. (2015). What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience. Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1177-1198.
  • Brocos, P., y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2022). Social Responsibility and Critical Disposition for Considering and Acting upon Conflicting Evidence in Argumentation About Sustainable Diets. En B. Puig y M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.) Critical Thinking in Biology and Environmental Education (pp. 211-227). Springer.
  • Covitt, B.A., y Anderson, C.W. (2022). Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science. Sci & Educ, 31, 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00322-6
  • Davies, M., y Barnett, R. (2015). Introduction. In M. Davies y R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 1-125). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
  • Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. (2018). Recomendación del consejo de 22 de mayo de 2018 relativa a las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=SV
  • Dillon, J. y Avramidou, L. (2020). Towards a viable response to COVID-19 from the science education community. JASTE, 11 (2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.33137/jaste.v11i2.34531
  • Facione, P. A. (1984). Toward a theory of critical thinking. Liberal Education, 70 (3), 253-61.
  • Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
  • Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., y Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1-25.
  • Facione, P. A. (2000). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
  • Feinstein, N. W., y Waddington, D. I. (2020). Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education’s response to the post-truth era. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 155-166.
  • García Molina, R. (2015). Seudociencia en el mundo contemporáneo. Alambique, 81, 25-33.
  • Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., y Rao, A. (2022). Socioscientific Issues Thinking and Action in the Midst of Science-in-the-Making. Sci & Educ, 31(5), 1105-1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00306-y
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action. Science education for an alternative future. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25, 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  • Hufnagel, E. (2022). Emotional sense-making and critical thinking in the era of post-truth: the case of climate change. En B. Puig y M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.) Critical Thinking in Biology and Environmental Education (pp. 41-54). Cham: Springer.
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. y Puig, B. (2022). Educating Critical Citizens to Face Post-truth: The Time Is Now. En B. Puig y M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.). Critical thinking in Biology and Environmental Education. Facing Challenges in a Post-truth World. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92006-7
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre y Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking. En B. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. McRobbie (Eds.). Second International Handbook for Science Education, Vol 2 (pp. 1001–1017) Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Jiménez Liso, R. (2020). Aprender ciencia escolar implica aprender a buscar pruebas para construir conocimiento. En D. Couso, M.R. Jimenez-Liso, C. Refojo, C. y J.A. Sacristán (Coords) (2020), Enseñando Ciencia con Ciencia (pp.53-63). FECYT y Fundacion Lilly. Penguin Random House.
  • Kampourakis, K. (2018). Science and uncertainty. Sci & Educ, 27(9), 829–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0019-3
  • Keren, A. (2018). The public understanding of what? Laypersons’ epistemic needs, the division of cognitive labor, and the demarcation of science. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1086/699690
  • Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.
  • Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
  • Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. (LOMLOE). https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2020-17264
  • McPeck, J. E. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. Routledge.
  • Nordine, J., Sorge, S., Delen, I., Evans, R., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Nilsson, P., Ropohl, M., y Stadler, M. (2021). Promoting Coherent Science Instruction through Coherent Science Teacher Education: A Model Framework for Program Design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(8), 911-933. https://doi.org/10.1080/104650X.2021.1902631
  • Norris, S. P. (1992). Bachelors, buckyballs and ganders: Seeking analogues for definitions of “critical thinker”. En H. A. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1992: Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 69–71). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos [OCDE]. (2020). PISA 2024 Strategic Vision and Direction for Science. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2024-assessment-analytical-framework-science-strategic-vision-proposal.htm
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C. y Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 315– 347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073.
  • Osborne, J., Pimentel, D., Alberts, B., Allchin, D., Barzilai, S., Bergstrom, C., Coffey, J., Donovan, B., Kivinen, K., Kozyreva. A., y Wineburg, S. (2022). Science Education in an Age of Misinformation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2017). 21st Century Skills Early Learning. Framework. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/EarlyLearning_ Framework/P21_ELF_Framework_Final.pdf.
  • Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge.
  • Pithers, R. T., y Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42 (3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579
  • Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., Bargiela, I. M., y Crujeiras, B. (2019). A systematic review on critical thinking intervention studies in higher education across professional fields. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 860-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586333
  • Puig, B., Castiñeiras, D., y Pérez Maceira, J. J. (2020). ¿Tratamientos convencionales o terapias alternativas? Alambique Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, 99, 43-48.
  • Puig, B., Crujeiras-Pérez, B., Bargiela, I. y Blanco-Anaya, P. (2021). Integration of Critical Thinking and Scientific Practices to Design-Based Pedagogy. En I. Elen (Ed.), Design Based Pedagogy book. Design Based Pedagogical Content Knowledge Across European Teacher Education Programs (pp. 89-128). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Puig, B. y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2022). The Integration of Critical thinking in Biology and Environmental Education. Contributions and Further Directions. En B. Puig y M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Critical thinking in Biology and Environmental Education. Facing Challenges in a Post-truth World (pp.269-276). Springer.
  • Puig, B. y Uskola, A. (2021). Debatir para aprender a pensar críticamente sobre ciencias. Alambique Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, 106, 79-80.
  • Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria. 2 de marzo del 2022. BOE núm. 52. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2022/03/01/157/con
  • Ruiz, J. J., Solbes, J., y Furió, C. (2013). Los debates sociocientíficos: un recurso para potenciar la competencia argumentativa en las clases de física y química [Oral communication]. IX Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias. Girona, España.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
  • Solbes, J. (2013). Contribución de las cuestiones socio-científicas al desarrollo del pensamiento crítico (II): Ejemplos. REurEDC, 10(2), 148-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2013.v10.i2.03http://reuredc.uca.es
  • Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., y Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34.
  • Valladares, L. (2022). Post-Truth and Education. STS Vaccines to Re-establish Science in the Public Sphere. Sci & Educ, 31, 1311-1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00293-0
  • Valladares, E. (2020). Retos del pensamiento crítico jurídico contemporáneo ante la complejidad de la racionalidad en la decisión judicial. Realidad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (156), 165-191.
  • Winch, C. (2006). Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking. Routledge.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet