The role of the Ascribee's representations in belief ascriptions

  1. Eduardo Pérez Navarro 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Filosofía Icultad de Filo
Revista:
Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía

ISSN: 0210-1602

Ano de publicación: 2017

Volume: 36

Número: 1

Páxinas: 113-125

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía

Referencias bibliográficas

  • CRIMMINS, M. (1998), ‘Hesperus and Phosphorus: Sense, Pretense, and Reference’, Philosophical Review, 107, pp. 1-48.
  • CRIMMINS, M. and PERRY, J. (1989), ‘The Prince and the Phone Booth’, Journal of Philosophy, 86, pp. 685-711.
  • KAPLAN, D. (1979), ‘On the Logic of Demonstratives’, in P. French et al. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 401-414.
  • KAPLAN, D. (1989), ‘Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals’, in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481-564.
  • MCKAY, T. and NELSON, M. (2010), ‘Propositional Attitude Reports’, in E. E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/prop-attitude-reports/>.
  • PERRY, J. (1979), ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs, 13, pp. 3-21.
  • RICHARD, M. (2008), When Truth Gives Out, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • RICHARD, M. (2013), Context and the Attitudes (Meaning in Context, Volume I), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • SALMON, N. (1986), Frege’s Puzzle, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.
  • SIDER, T. (1995), ‘Three Problems for Richard’s Theory of Belief Ascription’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25, pp. 487-513.
  • SOAMES, S. (1995), ‘Beyond Singular Propositions?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25, pp. 515-49.
  • SOAMES, S. (2002), Beyond Rigidity, Oxford, Oxford University Press.