La idea de espacio público en geografía humanahacia una conceptualización (crítica) contemporánea

  1. Estévez Villarino, Brais
Journal:
Documents d'anàlisi geogràfica

ISSN: 0212-1573

Year of publication: 2012

Volume: 58

Issue: 1

Pages: 137-163

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/DAG.200 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

More publications in: Documents d'anàlisi geogràfica

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The concept of «public space» has become widely used as a result of some of the urban processes that have taken place in the contemporary city. However, this discursive inflation has come hand in hand with a certain destabilization of the geographic conceptualization of public space. From modern thinking we inherited certain methodologies constricted to a predictable, boring network of binary oppositions, and their exhaustion prevented new, original findings or descriptions. On the other hand, out of some rare ontological debate has emerged another more creative and experimental epistemology which will lead to new paradigms �e.g. the consideration that any research about public space must be addressed from a perspective based on a multiplicity of relationships that refuses to take public space for granted and questions the more normative approaches.

Bibliographic References

  • Aramburu Otazu, Mikel (2008). Usos y significados del espacio público. ACE: Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno, III (8), 143-149.
  • Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Versión española: La condición humana. Barcelona: Paidós, 2005.
  • Arendt, H. (1997). Qué es la política? Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethic. Oxford: Polity Press. Versión española: El ser y el otro en la ética contemporánea: Feminismo, comunitarismo y posmodernismo. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2006.
  • Bingham, N. (1996). Object-ions: from technological determinism towards geographies of relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14 (6), 635-657.
  • Bridge, G. (2005). Reason in the City of Difference: Pragmatism, Communicative Action and Contemporary Urbanism. Londres: Routledge.
  • Butler, Judith (1990, 1999). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York y Londres: Routledge. Versión española: El género en disputa: El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 2007.
  • Coscuela, A. (1994). Darrera els postmodernistes, o les geografies culturals del capitalisme tardà. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica, 24, 13-58.
  • Cortés, José Miguel (2009). Deseos, cuerpos y ciudades. Barcelona: UOC.
  • Crang, Michael y Thrift, Nigel (eds.) (2000). Thinking Space (Critical Geographies). Londres: Routledge.
  • Creswell, Tim (2002). Introduction: theorizing place. En: Verstraet, G. y Cresswell, T. (eds.). Mobilizing Place, Placing Mobility. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 11-32.
  • Cresswell, Tim y Dixon, Deborah (eds.) (2002). Engaging Film: Geographies of mobility and identity. Londres: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • De Certeau, Michel (2000). La invención de lo cotidiano. Vol 1: Artes de Hacer. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
  • Delgado, Manuel (2007). Lògica del passavolant. Rudiments teòrics per a una antropologia dels carrers. Revista d'Etnologia de Catalunya, 31, 18-26.
  • Deutsche, R. (2007). Agorafobia. Quaderns portàtils. Barcelona: MACBA. Edición original: Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics. Cambrige, Massachussetts: The MIT Press, 1996.
  • Dewsbury, J.D. (2000). Performativity and the event: enacting a philosophy of difference. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18 (4), 473-496.
  • Dewsbury, J.D. (2003). Witnessing space: "knowledge without contemplation". Environment and Planning A, 35 (11), 1907-1932.
  • Dewsbury, J.D.; Harrison, P.; Rose, M. y Wylie, J. (2002). Enacting geographies. Geoforum, 33, 437-40.
  • Doel, Marcus (2007). Post-structuralist geography: a guide to relational space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, 809-810.
  • Duncan, Nancy (1996). BodySpace. Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality. Londres: Routledge.
  • Durkheim, E. (1968). Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa. Buenos Aires: Schapire. Versión original: The elementary forms of the religious life: a study in religious sociology. Londres: George Allen & Unwin, 1912.
  • Foucault, Michel (1978). Espacios otros: utopías y heterotopías. Carrer de la Ciutat, 1.
  • Fraser, Nancy (1997). Iustitia Interrupta: Reflexiones críticas desde la posición postsocialista. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Nueva York: Anchor Books. Versión española: La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1971.
  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relation in Public. Nueva York: Basic Books. Versión española: Relaciones en Público. Madrid: Alianza, 1979.
  • Goheen, P. (1998). Public space and geography of the modern city. Progress in Human Geography, 22 (4), 479-496.
  • Gregson, Nicky y Rose, Gilian (2000). Taking Butler elsewhere: performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18 (4), 433-452.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (2006). Historia y crítica de la opinión pública. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili. Edición original: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Berlín: Luchterhand Verlag, 1962.
  • Harvey, David (1990). Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80, 3, 418-434.
  • Harvey, David (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hubbard, Phil (2005). Space/place. En: Atkinson, D. et al. (eds.). Cultural Geography: A Critical Dictionary of Key Concepts. Londres: I. B. Tauris, 41-48.
  • Joseph, Isaac (1999). Retomar la ciudad: El espacio público como lugar de la acción. Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  • Latham, A. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: Reflections on the diary photograph. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1993-2017.
  • Latham, A. y Conradson, D. (2003). The possibilities of performance. Environment and Planning A, 35 (11), 1901-1906.
  • Latour, Bruno (2007). Nunca fuimos modernos: Ensayo de Antropología Simétrica. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
  • Latour, Bruno (2008). Reensamblar lo social: Una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Buenos Aires: Manantial. Edición original: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Laurier, E. (2001). Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls. Environment and Planning D, 19, 485-504.
  • Lefebvre, Henri (1974). La production de l'espace. París: Anthropos.
  • Lefebvre, Henri (1976). Espacio y política: El derecho a la ciudad II. Barcelona: Península. Edición original: Espace et politique: Le droit à la ville, II. París: Anthropos, 1972.
  • Lefebvre, Henri (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Edición original: La production de l'espace. París: Anthropos, 1974.
  • Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: the busyness of being "more-thanrepresentational". Progress in Human Geography, 29 (1), 83-94.
  • Lorimer, H. (2007). Cultural geography: worldly shapes, differently arranged. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (1), 89-100.
  • Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: nonrepresentational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography, 32 (4), 551-559.
  • Low, Setha y Smith, Neil (2006). The politics of public space. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Marrero Guillamón, I. (2008). Luces y sombras. El compromiso en la etnografía. Revista Colombiana de Antropologia, 44 (enero-junio). [http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=105012924004; consulta: 17 de febrero de 2009]
  • Massey, Doreen, (1992). Politics and space/time. New Left Review, 196, 65-84.
  • Massey, Doreen, (1999). Space-time, "science" and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24, 261-276.
  • Massey, Doreen, (2005). For Space. Londres: Sage Publications.
  • McCormack, D.P. (2003). An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28 (4), 488-507.
  • Massey, Doreen, (2005). Diagramming power in practice and performance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23 (1), 119-147.
  • Meehan, Johanna (ed.) (1995). Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Minh-Ha, Trinh T. (1993). The Totalizing Quest of Meaning. En: Renov, M. (ed.). Theorizing Documentary. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Murdoch, J. (1997a). Towards a geography of heterogeneous assotiations. Progress in Human Geography, 21 (3), 321-337
  • Murdoch, J. (1997b). Inhuman/nonhuman/human: actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15 (6), 731-756.
  • Murdoch, J. (1998). The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29 (4), 357-374.
  • Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked: The politics of Performance. Nueva York: Routledge
  • Popke, J. (2003). Poststructuralist Ethics: Subjectivity, Responsibility an Community. Progress in Human Geography, 27 (3), 298-316.
  • Popke, J. (2009). Geography and ethics: non-representational encounters, collective responsibility and economic difference. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 81-90.
  • Popper, Karl (1963). Conjectures and refutations. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Pratt, G. (2000). Research performances. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18 (5), 639-651.
  • Santos, M. (1986). Por uma geografia nova. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1978. Versión castellana: Por una geografía nueva. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, 1990.
  • Serres, Michel (1995). Atlas. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Sharp, Joanne (2009). Geography and Gender: What belongs to feminist geography? Emotion, power and change. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (1), 74-80.
  • Soja, Edward W. (1980). The Socio-Spatial Dialectics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70 (2), 207-225.
  • Soja, Edward W. (1989). Postmodern Geographies. The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. Londres: Verso.
  • Soja, Edward W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Soja, Edward W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell. Versión castellana: Postmetrópolis: Estudios críticos de las ciudades y las regiones. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños, 2009.
  • Spinoza, B. (1987). Ética. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Staeheli, L. y Mitchell, D. (2007). Locating the Public in Research and Practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 792-811.
  • Thrift, Nigel (1996). Spatial formations. Londres: Sage.
  • Thrift, Nigel (1997). The still point: resistance, expressive embodiment and dance. En: Pile, S. y Keith, M. (eds.). Geographies of resistance. Londres: Routledge, 124-51.
  • Thrift, Nigel (1999). Steps to an ecology of place. En: Massey, D.; Allen, J. y Sarre, P. (eds.). Human geography today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 295-322.
  • Thrift, Nigel (2000a). Actor-Network Theory. En: Johnston, R.J.; Gregory, D.; Pratt, G. y Watts, M. (eds.). The Dictionary of Human Geography. 4a ed. Oxford y Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 4-6.
  • Thrift, Nigel (2000b). Afterwords. Environment and plannind D: Society and Space, 18, 213-255.
  • Thrift, Nigel (2003). Performance and Environment and Planning A, 35, 2019-2024.
  • Thrift, Nigel y Dewsbury, J.D. (2000). Dead geographies and how to make them live. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 411-432.
  • Tirado, F.J. (2005). La teoría del actor-red y la reinvención de lo social. AIBR, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, número especial noviembre-diciembre. [http://www.aibr.org/antropologia/44nov/libros/nov0501.pdf; consulta: 22 de febrero de 2010]
  • Vaiou, Dina y Kalandides, Ares (2007). Cities of Others: Access, contact and participation in everyday public spaces. [Manuscrito facilitado por los autores.]
  • VVAA (1988). Problemas de género. Archipiélago, 30. Barcelona.
  • Whatmore, Sarah (1999). Hybrid geographies and re-thinking the "human" in human geography. En: Massey, D.; Allen, J. y Sarre, P. (eds.). Human Geography Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Whatmore, Sarah (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures and spaces. Londres: Sage.
  • Whatmore, Sarah (2006). Materialist returns: practicing cultural geography in and for a more-thanhuman world. Cultural Geographies, 13, 600-609.