Comparación entre un modelo categorial general (CBCA) y otro específico (SEG) a través del estudio de la validez incrementada en la discriminación entre realidad y simulación en casos de violencia de género

Resumo

Assuming Undeutsch hypothesis, the memory of reality (ie, lives) and he invented (ie, imagined or manufactured) have content characteristics which distinguishes them, several systems have been developed to differentiate categorical between both memories. The best known and proven is the CBCA, which applies indiscriminately to all types of populations (children, adults) and contexts (eg, sexual assault, domestic violence). However, other systems have also shown categorical productive and efficient, while it has been observed that there is an interaction between categories and contexts. In sum, the categories of reality can be more than the CBCA including categories and can realize own specific caseloads. In this line, Global Evaluation System (GES), which includes originally more general categories of reality that the CBCA, adapted to cases of domestic violence by entering into specific categories such cases. To see if the potential gain with this system of gender itself was relevant, we computed the specific model validity increased in relation to the general model. The comparison results of the application of both content analysis to 25 real and invented declarations of domestic violence, revealed a specific model increased validity of GES on a generic model of CBCA in the correct classification of the truth and lies of 16.81% (phi =, 410), a moderate effect size, and 38% in control of false negatives, a large effect size. In conclusion, the data support the suitability of the use of GES adapted to cases of domestic violence against the CBCA in this kind of casuistry.