Análisis comparado de las herramientas de fact-checking de España y Argentina

  1. Alejandro Ferrández-Mas
  2. Paulo Carlos López-López 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Journal:
Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos

ISSN: 1853-3523,  1668-0227

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Fake News y desinformación: desafíos para las democracias de América Latina y el Caribe

Issue: 161

Pages: 125-139

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18682/CDC.VI161.6982 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos

Abstract

The spread of fake news is an emerging phenomenon in our society that endan-gers elements as essential as politics, the economy and even public health. In this context, news verification tools are a very valuable tool to prevent the spread of any false informa-tion through the media or social networks. The following research analyzes these tools in the media systems of Spain and Argentina, revealing organizations with quite similar characteristics between both systems, transparent fact-checking institutions, with an ar-gumentative verification method that is provided with verification scales to accompany the final result and with a plurality in terms of the project model that is presented in both countries.

Bibliographic References

  • Adair, B. y Thakore, I. (2015). Factcheking census finds continued groth around the world. Duke Reporter’s Lab. Recuperado de: https://reporterslab.org/fact-checking-censusfinds-growth-around-world/
  • Allcott, H. y Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://www.doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  • Amazeen, M. A. (2017). Journalistic interventions. The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism, 21(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884917730217
  • Amazeen, M. A., Thorson, E., Muddiman, A., & Graves, L. (2015). A Comparison of Correction For- mats: The Effectiveness and Effects of Rating Scale versus Contextual Corrections of Misinformation. American Press Institute. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/The-Effectiveness-of-Rating-Scales.pdf
  • Amorós, M. (2018). Fake News. La verdad de las noticias falsas. Plataforma Editorial.
  • Cárdenas Rica, M. L. (2019). Análisis de las iniciativas de fact-checking en España. Revista Inclusiones, 6(Especial), 62-82.
  • Chan, M. S.; Jones, C. R.; Jamieson, K. H. y Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A Me- taAnalysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1532-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
  • Choi, S. (2015). The Two-Step Flow of Communication in Twitter-Based Public Forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 696-711. https://www.doi. org/10.1177/0894439314556599
  • Currie-Sivek, S. y Bloyd-Peshkin, S. (2018). Where Do Facts Matter? Journalism Practice, 12(4), 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1307694
  • Duke Reporter’s Lab. (2022). Fact-Checking. Duke Reporter’s Lab. https://reporterslab.org/fact-checking/
  • Elizabeth, J. (2014). Who are you calling a fact checker? American Press Institute. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/fact-checking-project/fact-checker-definition/
  • Graves, L. & Cherubini, F. (2016). The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. Reuters Institute Digital News Report, 1-40. Recuperado de: https://bit.ly/2U7xZqw
  • López-López, P.C., Lagares Díez, N. & Puentes Rivera, I. (2021). La inteligencia artificial contra la desinformación: una visión desde la comunicación política. Razón Y Palabra, 25(112), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v25i112.1891
  • López Pan, F. y Rodríguez Rodríguez, J. (2020). El Fact Checking en España. Plataformas, prácticas y rasgos distintivos. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26(3), 1045-1065.
  • Marietta, M. y Barker, D. (2019). One Nation, Two Realities. Dueling Facys in American Democracy. Oxford University Press.
  • Martin, N. (2017). Journalism, the pressures of verification and notions of post-truth in civil society. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 41-56. https://www.doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5476
  • Nyhan, B.; Porter, E.; Reifler, J. y Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking Fact-checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. Political Behavior, 42, 936-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
  • Palau-Sampio, D. (2018). Fact-checking y vigilancia del poder: La verificación del discurso público en los nuevos medios de América Latina. Communication & Society, 31(3), 347-365.
  • Redondo, M. (2018). Verificación digital para periodistas Manual contra bulos y desinformación internacional. UOC.
  • Shin, J. y Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan Selective Sharing: The Biased Diffusion of Factchecking Messages on Social Media. Journal of Comunication, 67(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284
  • Stencel, M. (2016, febrero 16). Global Fact-Checking up 50% in Past Year. Duke Reporter’s Lab. https://reporterslab.org/global-fact-checking-up-50-percent/
  • Vizoso, A. & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2019). Plataformas de fact-checking en español. Características, organización y método. Comunication & Society, 32(1), 127-144.
  • Wintersieck, A. L. (2017). Debating the Truth: The Impact of Fact-Checking During Electoral Debates. American Politics Research, 45(2), 304-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X16686555
Data source: Dialnet