Los procesos de autoaprendizaje de los docentes universitarios de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas

  1. López-Calvo, Sara 1
  2. Dans Álvarez de Sotomayor, Isabel 2
  3. Muñoz-Carril, Pablo-César 2
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Zeitschrift:
Educar

ISSN: 0211-819X,  2014-8801

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Titel der Ausgabe: Ecologies digitals i aprenentatge autodirigit

Ausgabe: 58

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 305-320

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5565/REV/EDUCAR.1514 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Educar

Zusammenfassung

Training of university teachers is a fundamental component of professional teacher development. Within the different learning modalities, self-learning or self-training is particularly important today, as the boundaries between different learning contexts are increasingly blurred thanks to the increase in ICT. In order to understand the configuration of learning processes of university teachers in the field of social and legal sciences, a qualitative study was carried out with eight of the best teachers at the University of A Coruña, evaluated according to the ANECA DOCENTIA program. Two semi-structured interviews were used for data collection. The results are organized around three main elements: perceptions regarding the need for self-training, from which assessments and difficulties regarding training are extracted; past and present influences from people and experiences that lead us to want to self-train; and the resources used for self-learning. The data reveal that a fundamental component of teacher updating is based on continuous self-learning, especially in nonformal and informal contexts. The family, other teachers and the students themselves are key in learning processes, together with technological resources.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • BARRON, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1-36.
  • BARRON, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
  • BAUMAN, Z. (2017). Retropía. Paidós.
  • BOYER, S. L.; EDMONDSON, D. R.; ARTIS, A. B. y FLEMING, D. (2014). Self-Directed Learning: A Tool for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313494010
  • BRONFENBRENNER, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by Nature and Design, 3(2). Harvard University Press. http://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.pdf.
  • BURBULES, N. C.; FANB, G. y REPP, P. (2020). Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93-97.
  • CORBIN, J. y STRAUSS, A. L. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
  • DAY, C. (1998). La Formación Permanente del Profesorado en Europa: Temas y Condiciones para su Desarrollo en el Siglo XXI. Revista de Educación, 317, 31-44.
  • FAURE, E.; HERRERA, F.; KADDOURA, A.-R.; LOPES, H.; PETROVSKI, A. V.; RAHNEMA, M. y WARD, F. C. (1973). Aprender a ser: La educación del futuro. UNESCO.
  • FEIXAS, M. (2004). The influence of personal, institutional and contextual in the career and educational development of university teachers. Educar, 33, 31-59. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.260
  • FERNÁNDEZ COLLADO, C.; HERNÁNDEZ-SAMPIERI, R. y BAPTISTA LUCIO, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación científica. McGraw-Hill.
  • FLICK, U. (2013). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Morata.
  • GONZÁLEZ-SANMAMED, M.; SANGRÀ, A.; SOUTO-SEIJO, A. y ESTÉVEZ BLANCO, I. (2018). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la Era Digital: Desafíos para la Educación Superior. Publicaciones, 48(1), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v48i1.7329
  • IMBERNÓN, F. (2014). Calidad de la enseñanza y formación del profesorado: Un cambio necesario. Octaedro.
  • IMBERNÓN, F. y GUERRERO, C. (2017). ¿Existe en la universidad una profesionalización docente? Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 56(11), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/56/11
  • JACKSON, N. (2013). The Concept of Learning Ecologies. En N. J. JACKSON y G.B. COOPER (eds.). Lifewide Learning, Education and Personal Development (chapter A5). https://www.lifewideeducation.uk/uploads/1/3/5/4/13542890/a5._norman_jackson.pdf.
  • JACKSON, N. y BARNETT, R. (2020). Introduction: Steps to ecologies for learning and practice. En N. JACKSON y R. BARNETT (eds.). Ecologies for Learning and Practice. Routledge.
  • JANNE, H. (1973). Pour une politique communautaire de l’éducation. Boletín Comisión Europea, suplemento, 10(73), 6-56.
  • KALENTZIS, M. y COPE, B. (2017). e-Learning Ecologies: Principles for New Learning and Assessment. Routledge.
  • KALZ, M. (2015). Lifelong Learning and Its Support with New Technologies. En N. J. SMELSER y P. B. BALTES (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social y Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92006-3
  • KVALE, S. (2014). Las entrevistas en investigación educativa. Morata. https://elibro-net.accedys.udc.es/es/ereader/bibliotecaudc/51837.
  • LI, N.; HUIJSER, H.; XI, Y.; LIMNIOU, M.; ZHANG, X. y KEK, M. (2022). Disrupting the Disruption: A Digital Learning HeXie Ecology Model. Education Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020063
  • MACFARLANE, A. E. (2019). Devices and desires: Competing visions of a good education in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1125-1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12764
  • MAXWELL, J. A. (2019). Diseño de investigación cualitativa. Gedisa. https://elibro-net.accedys.udc.es/es/ereader/bibliotecaudc/127783.
  • RANIERI, M.; GIAMPAOLO, M. y BRUNI, I. (2019). Exploring educators’ professional learning ecologies in a blended learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1673-1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12793
  • SAADATMAND, M. y KUMPULAINEN, K. (2012). Emerging Technologies and New Learning Ecologies: Learners’ Perceptions of Learning in Open and Networked Environments. 8th International Conference on Networked Learning 2012, 266-275.
  • SANGRÁ, A.; RAFFAGHELLI, J-E y GUITERT-CATASÚS, M. (2019). Learning ecologies through a lens: Ontological, methodological and applicative issues. A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1619-1638. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12795
  • SANTOS-CAAMAÑO, F.-J.; VÁZQUEZ-CANCELO, M.-J. y RODRÍGUEZ-MACHADO, E.-R. (2021). Tecnologías digitales y ecologías de aprendizaje: Desafíos y oportunidades. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39(2), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.466091
  • STAKE, R. E. (2010). Estudios de casos cualitativos. En K. DENZIN e Y. LINCOLN (eds.). Manual de investigación cualitativa, vol. 3 (pp. 154-197). Gedisa.
  • VÁSQUES HERNÁNDEZ, R. B.; ESPINOSA MATOS, O. A.; FÉLIZ GÓMEZ, W. R. y MARTÍNEZ RIVAS, S. (2019). La tecnología de la información y comunicación para fortalecer las competencias tecnológicas de los docentes. Educación Superior, 28, 59-83.
  • YIN, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
  • ZEIDNER, M. y STOEGER, H. (2019). Self-regulated learning (SRL): A guide for the perplexed. High Ability Studies, 30(1-2), 9-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1589369
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet