Estimación de la eficacia de la escala Fptsd para detectar simulación de TEPUna revisión meta-analítica

  1. Yurena Gancedo
  2. Jéssica Sanmarco
  3. Verónica Marcos
  4. Dolores Seijo
Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

ISSN: 2171-2069

Ano de publicación: 2021

Volume: 12

Número: 1

Páxinas: 44-57

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

Resumo

The assessment of psychological harm to crime victims has become a regular demand on forensic psychologists. Such evaluation requires not only the diagnosis of psychological harm, but also the differential diagnosis of malingering. For the malingering differential diagnosis of psychological harm, the MMPI-2 has the Fptsd scale. However, there is controversy as to the usefulness of this scale. As for this, a random effects meta-analytical review of sizes of experiments corrected by sampling error and criterion unreliability was designed. Eight primary studies were selected from which 12 effect sizes were extracted. The results showed that the Fptsd scale was significant and highly sensitive to the malingering of psychological harm in general (d = 1.51/? = 2.08) and in all the conditions studied (i.e. experimental sample, type of design and contrast group) and of great practical usefulness in the detection and classification of malingering. In addition, it revealed specificity (discriminant validity) before the malingering of psychological damage. The implications for forensic practice of the results, limitations on generalization and increased validity on the Fp scale are discussed.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Funding: This research has been sponsored by a grant of the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (PSI2017-87278-R), and by a grant of Xunta de Galicia (GPC), in the context of the project “Revisión meta-analítica de los instrumentos forenses de evaluación del daño psicológico [Meta-analytic review of forensic psychometric instrument used to evaluate psychological damage]”.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Amado, B. G., Arce, R., & Herraiz, A. (2015). Psychological injury in victims of child sexualabuse: A meta-analytic review. Psychosocial Intervention, 24, 49-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.03.002
  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. text. rev.) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • American Psychiatric Association (2013).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mentaldisorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Arbisi, P. A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & McNulty, J. (2006).The ability of the MMPI-2 to detect feigned PTSDwithin the context of compensation seeking. Psychological Services, 3(4), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/1541-1559.3.4.249
  • Arce, R. (2017). Análisis de contenido de las declaraciones de testigos: Evaluación de la validez científica y judicial de la hipótesis y la prueba forense [Content analysis of the witness statements: Evaluation of the scientific and judicial validity of the hypothesis and the forensic proof]. Acción Psicológica, 14(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.14.2.21347
  • Arce, R. (2018). Evaluación del daño psicológico: Psicometría, entrevista y técnica forense [Assessment of psychological harm: Psychometry, interview and forensic technique]. In E. Carbonell, D. Pineda & M. Novo (Eds.), Psicología jurídica: Ciencia y profesión (pp. 235-244). Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense.
  • Arce, R., Arias, E., Novo, M., & Fariña, F. (2020). Are interventions with batterers effective? A meta-analytical review. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(3), 153-164. https://doi. org/10.5093/pi2020a11
  • Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2001). Construcción y validación de un procedimiento basado en una tarea de conocimiento para la medida de la huella psíquica en víctimas de delitos: La entrevista clínico-forense [Construction and validation of an interview based-knowledge task for the measure of the psychological harm in victims of crimes: The forensic-clinical interview]. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2006). Evaluación del daño moral en accidentes de tráfico: Desarrollo y validación de un protocolo para la detección de la simulación [Evaluating psychological injury in motor vehicle accidents (MVA): Development and validation of a protocol for detecting simulation]. Psicothema, 18(2), 278-283. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=3210
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2009). Creación y validación de un protocolo de evaluación forense de las secuelas psicológicas de la violencia de género [Creation and validation of a forensic protocol to assess psychological harm in battered women]. Psicothema, 21(2), 241-247. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3621.pdf
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Fraga, A. (2000). Género y formación de juicios en un caso de violación [Gender and juror judgment making in a case of rape]. Psicothema, 12(4), 623-628.Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/381.pdf
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2015). Daño psicológico en casos de víctimas de violencia de género: estudio comparativo de las evaluaciones forenses [Psychological injury in intimate partner violence cases: A contrastive analysis of forensic measures]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 6(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rips.2015.04.002
  • Arce, R., Pampillón, M. C., & Fariña, F. (2002). Desarrollo y evaluación de un procedimiento empírico para la detección de la simulaciónde enajenación mental en el contextolegal [Development and validation of an empirical procedure to detect malingering of mental insanity in legal setting]. Anuario de Psicología, 33(3), 385-408. Retrieved from https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/Anuariopsicologia/article/view/8769/10980b
  • Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa870107
  • Arias, E., Arce, R., Vázquez, M. J., & Marcos, V. (2020). Treatment efficacy on the cognitive competence of convicted intimate partner violence offenders. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(3), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.4287
  • Blanchard, E. B., & Hickling, H. J. (2004). What are the psychosocial effects of MVAs on survivors? In E. B. Blanchard & E. J. Hickling (Eds.), After the crash: Psychological assessment and treatment of survivors of motor vehicle accidents (2nd ed., pp. 57-97). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Brady, K. T., Killeen, T. K., Brewerton, T. & Lucerini, S. (2000). Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and post traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61(suppl 7), 22-32.
  • Brown, T. A., Campbell, L. A., Lehman, C. L., Grisham, J. R., & Mancill, R. B. (2001). Current and lifetime comorbidity of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders in a large clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 585-599. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037//0021-843X.110.4.585
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA
  • Efendov, A. A. (2007). Incremental predictive validity of the TSI, MMPI-2, and SIMS in identifying coached and uncoached feigning of PTSD in workplace accident victims (Doctoral thesis. University of Toronto, Canada). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/psycinfo/docview/622026284/
  • Elhai, J. D., Naifeh, J. A., Zucker, I. S.,Gold, S. N., Deitsch, S. E., & Frueh, B. C. (2004). Discriminating malingered from genuine civilian posttraumatic stressdisorder: A validation of three MMPI2 infrequency scales (F, Fp, and Fptsd). Assessment, 11(2), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104264965
  • Elhai, J. D., Ruggiero, K. J., Frueh, B. C., Beckham, J. C., Gold, P. B., & Feldman, M. E. (2002). The Infrequency-Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale (Fptsd) for the MMPI2: Development and initial validation with veterans presenting with combat-related PTSD. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7903_08
  • Fariña, F., Arce, R., & Real, S. (1994). Ruedas deidentificación: De la simulación y la realidad Fariña, F., Arce, R., & Real, S. (1994). Ruedas deidentificación: De la simulación y la realidad [Lineups: A comparision of high fidelity research and research in a real context].Psicothema, 6(3), 395-402. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/935.pdf
  • Fariña, F., Arce, R., Vilariño, M., & Novo, M.(2014). Assessment of the standard forensicprocedure for the evaluation of psychologicalinjury in intimate-partner violence. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, e32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.30
  • Gallego, R., Novo, M., Fariña, F., & Arce, R. (2019). Child-to-parent violence and parentto-child violence: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(2), 51-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2019a4
  • Garrido-Macías, M., Valor-Segura, I., & Expósito, F. (2020). Which tactics of sexual violence predict leaving the relationship? The role of dependence towards partner.European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2020a6
  • Graham, J. R. (2011). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (5th ed.).New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Greene, R. L. (2011). The MMPI-2-MMPI-2-RF: An interpretive manual (3rd ed.). Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
  • Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IVdisorders in the National Comorbidity SurveyReplication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617
  • Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Hughes, M. & Nelson, C. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52,1048-1060. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012
  • Lange, R. T., Sullivan, K. A., & Scott, C. (2010). Comparison of MMPI-2 and PAI validity ndicators to detect feigned depression and PTSD symptom reporting. Psychiatry Research, 176(2-3), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.004
  • Lehavot, K., Katon, J. G., Chen, J. A., Fortney, J. C., & Simpson, T. L. (2018). Post-traumatic stress disorder by gender and veteran status. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(1), e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.09.008
  • Marcos, V., Gancedo, Y., Castro, B., & Selaya,A. (2020). Victimización de violencia entre novios, gravedad percibida en las conductas de violencia entre novios, mitos del amor romántico, y dependencia emocional entre chicos y chicas adolescentes [Dating violence victimization, perceived gravity in dating violence behaviors, sexism, romantic love myths and emotional dependence between female and male adolescents]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 11(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.040
  • Marshal, M. B., & Bagby, R. M. (2006). The incremental validity and clinical utility of the MMPI-2 Infrequency Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale. Assessment, 13(4), 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290842
  • Monteiro, A., Vázquez, M. J., Seijo, D., & Arce, R. (2018). ¿Son los criterios de realidad válidos para clasificar y discernir entre memorias de hechos auto-experimentados y de eventos vistos en vídeo? [Are the reality criteria valid to classify and to discriminate between memories of self-experienced events and memories of video-observed events?]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 9(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2018.02.020
  • O’Donnell, M. L., Creamer, M. Bryant, R. A., Schnyder, U., & Shalev, A. (2006). Posttraumatic disorders following injury: Assessment and other methodological considerations. In G. Young, A. W. Kane & K. Nicholson (Eds.), Psychological knowledge in courts: PTSD, pain and TBI (pp. 70-84). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879- 903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Redondo, L., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Novo, M., & Arce, R. (2019). A meta-analytical review of the responses in the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF clinical and restructured scales of parents in child custody dispute. Anales de Psicología, 35(1) 156-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.35.1.338381
  • Rogers, R. (2008). Structured interview and dissimulation. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 301-322). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Rogers, R. (2018). Researching response styles. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 592-614). New York; NY: Guilford Press.
  • Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). The SIRS test manual. Tampa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders. A metaanalysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10(2), 160-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191103252349
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting errors and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9590-1
  • Street, A. E., & Dardis, C. M. (2018). Using a social construction of gender lens to understand gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 66, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.001
  • Tolin, D. F., Steenkamp, M. M., Marx, B. P., & Litz, B. T. (2010). Detecting symptom exaggeration in combat veterans using the MMPI–2 symptom validity scales: A mixed group validation. Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 729-736. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020973
  • Tribunal Supremo (Sala de lo Penal, Sección 2ª). Sentencia Nº 1029/1997 de 29 de septiembre, 1997.
  • Tribunal Supremo (Sala de lo Penal, Sección 2ª). Sentencia Nº 213/2002 de 14 de febrero, 2002.
  • United Nations (1985). Declaration of basic principles of justice for victims of crime and abuse of power. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocitycrimes/Doc.29_declaration%20victims%20crime%20and%20abuse%20of%20power.pdf
  • Vilariño, M., Amado, B. G., Vázquez, M. J., & Arce, R. (2018). Psychological harm in women victims of intimate partner violence: Epidemiology and quantification of injury in mental health markers. Psychosocial Intervention, 27(3), 145-152. https://doi. org/10.5093/pi2018a23
  • Vilariño, M., Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2013).Forensic-clinical interview: Reliability and validity for the evaluation of psychologicalinjury. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 5(1), 1-21. Retrieved from https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/articulo20180219092235.pdf
  • Whitney, K. A., Davis, J. J., Shepard, P. H., & Herman, S. M. (2008). Utility of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(7-8), 777-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.001
Fonte de datos: Dialnet