Procesos de Aprendizaje en Aprendizaje-Servicio UniversitarioUna Revisión Teórica

  1. David García Romero 1
  2. José Luis Lalueza 1
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X,  2174-5374

Ano de publicación: 2019

Volume: 22

Número: 2

Páxinas: 45-68

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5944/EDUCXX1.22716 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Resumo

El Aprendizaje-Servicio (ApS) ha extendido su alcance en la educación superior en las últimas décadas, incrementando el número de programas implementados y de centros que los sustentan. Este proceso ha sido acompañado por un despegue de la investigación, con la aparición de sociedades académicas y revistas dedicadas al ámbito. Pero estos encuentros científicos han evidenciados divergencias en la forma de entender el ApS en cuestiones fundamentales. En este trabajo analizamos una de esas divergencias: la diversidad de modelos conceptuales acerca de los procesos de aprendizaje propios del ApS y sus correspondientes líneas de investigación. Proponemos una discusión crítica sobre este tema que ayude a fundamentar un marco teórico sólido para el ApS. Para ello realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica en torno a los temas “procesos de aprendizaje” e “identidad” en Aprendizaje-Servicio, utilizando la base de datos ERIC. De los artículos encontrados, procedimos a una selección para su lectura en profundidad, en aras de encontrar las principales líneas de investigación en ApS y construir una discusión alrededor de los procesos de aprendizaje e identidad en los que se fundamenta la investigación actual. Examinamos las similitudes y diferencias de tres perspectivas teóricas que identificamos como centrales en la investigación, el aprendizaje experiencial, el aprendizaje transformativo y las teorías críticas, y una cuarta emergente, el enfoque histórico-cultural, elaborando nuestra discusión en dos bloques: procesos de aprendizaje y procesos de identidad. Nuestro análisis permite identificar diferentes procesos de aprendizaje e identidad presentes en los modelos teóricos analizados, que a nuestro juicio permiten definir los modelos de aprendizaje propios del ApS: reflexión a partir de la experiencia, transformación de la identidad a través de la alteridad, asunción de la agencia a través de la toma de conciencia social e implicación en una comunidad de prácticas a través de la construcción de significados y metas compartidos.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Esta investigación forma parte del proyecto I+D+i: EDU2014-55354-R, financiado por la Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Averett, P.E., & Arnd-Caddigan, M. (2014). Preparing BSW Students for Service-Learning: Enhancing Epistemological Reflection. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(3), 316-331.
  • Bowdon, M., Pigg, S., & Mansfield, L.P. (2014). Feminine and Feminist Ethics and Service-Learning Site Selection: The Role of Empathy. Feminist Teacher, 24(1), 57-82.
  • Bennett, D., Power, A., Thomson, C., Mason, B., & Bartleet, B.L. (2016). Reflection for learning, learning for reflection: Developing Indigenous competencies in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(2), Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2SgNUqf
  • Bringle, R.G., Hatcher, J.A., & Jones, S.G. (Eds.). (2011). International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
  • Carracelas-Juncal, C. (2013). When Service-Learning Is Not a≫ Bordercrossing ≫ Experience: Outcomes of a Graduate Spanish Online Course. Hispania, 96(2), 295-309.
  • Carson, R.L., & Domangue, E.A. (2013). The emotional component of servicelearning. Journal of Experiential Education, 36(2), 139-154.
  • Chan, K., Ng, E., & Chan, C.C. (2016). Empowering Students Through Service-Learning of Community Psychology: A Case in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(4), 25-36.
  • Colby, A. (2008). The place of political learning in college. Peer Review, 10(2/3). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2DiMx01
  • Deeley, S.J. (2016). El Aprendizaje-Servicio en educación superior: Teoría, práctica y perspectiva crítica. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan.
  • Dewey J (1938) Experience and Education. New York, USA: MacMillan Publishing Company.
  • Dvir, N., & Avissar, I. (2014). Constructing a critical professional identity among teacher candidates during service-learning. Professional development in education, 40(3), 398-415.
  • Engberg, M.E. (2013). The influence of study away experiences on global perspective-taking. Journal of College Student Development, 54(5), 466-480.
  • Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki. (Eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fenton, L., & Gallant, K. (2016). Integrated Experiential Education: Definitions and a Conceptual Model. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 7.
  • Freire, P. (1987). Letter to the North American teacher. In I. Shor (Ed.), Freire for the classroom, a sourcebook for liberatory teaching (pp. 211-214). Portsmouth, NH, USA: Boynton Cook Publishers.
  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th Anniversary Edition. New York, USA: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Frost, G., & Connolly, M. (2015). The road less travelled? Pathways from passivity to agency in student learning. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 47-54.
  • Geijsel, F., & Meijers, F. (2005). Identity learning: The core process of educational change. Educational studies, 31(4), 419-430.
  • Gerstenblatt, P. (2014). Blogs as a Representation of Student Experiences in a Service Learning Course. Metropolitan Universities, 25(3), 111-129.
  • Gil-Gomez, J., Chiva-Bartoll, O., & Marti-Puig, M. (2015). The impact of service learning on the training of pre-service teachers: Analysis from a physical education subject. European Physical Education Review, 21(4), 467-484.
  • Giles, H.C. (2014). Risky Epistemology: Connecting with Others and Dissonance in Community-Based Research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 20(2), 65-78.
  • Gold, S. (2010). The implications of Rorty’s post-foundational ‘moral imagination’ for teaching business ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 299-310.
  • Haddix, M. (2015). Preparing community-engaged teachers. Theory Into Practice, 54(1), 63-70.
  • Harrison, B., Clayton, P.H., & Tilley-Lubbs, G.A. (2014). Troublesome Knowledge, Troubling Experience: An Inquiry into Faculty Learning in Service-Learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 20(2), 5-18.
  • Hunt, K.P., & Krakow, M.M. (2015). The best of both worlds: exploring crosscollaborative community engagement. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(2), 87-98.
  • Iverson, S.V., & James, J.H. (2013). Selfauthoring a civic identity: A qualitative analysis of change-oriented service learning. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50(1), 88-105.
  • Jacoby, B. (2003). Fundamentals of service-learning partnerships. In B. Jacoby & Associates, Building partnerships for service-learning (pp. 1-19.) San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kiely, R. (2005). A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan journal of community service learning, 12(1), 5-22.
  • Leek, D.R. (2016). Policy debate pedagogy: a complementary strategy for civic and political engagement through service-learning. Communication Education, 65(4), 397-408.
  • Levkoe, C.Z., Brail, S., & Daniere, A. (2014). Engaged pedagogy and transformative learning in graduate education: A service-learning case study. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(3), 68-85.
  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice. New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 5-12). San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
  • McDowell Marinchak, C.L. (2014). Students Connecting with the University Community: The Learning Community as Bridge. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 2(2), Article 8. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2DlmrJC
  • McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York, NY, USA: Longman.
  • McMillan, J., Goodman, S., & Schmid, B. (2016). Illuminating ≪Transaction Spaces≫ in Higher Education: University–Community Partnerships and Brokering as ≪Boundary Work≫. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(3), 8-31.
  • Mitchell, T.D., Richard, F.D., Battistoni, R.M., Rost-Banik, C., Netz, R., & Zakoske, C. (2015). Reflective Practice That Persists: Connections between Reflection in Service-Learning Programs and in Current Life. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 21(2), 49-63.
  • Naude, L. (2015). On (un) common ground: Transforming from dissonance to commitment in a service learning class. Journal of College Student Development, 56(1), 84-102.
  • Nickols, S.Y., Rothenberg, N.J., Moshi, L., & Tetloff, M. (2013). International service-learning: Students’ personal challenges and intercultural competence. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(4), 97-124.
  • Perren, J., Grove, N., & Thornton, J. (2013). Three Empowering Curricular Innovations for Service-Learning in ESL Programs. TESOL Journal, 4(3), 463-486.
  • Petrov, L.A. (2013). A pilot study of service-learning in a Spanish heritage speaker course: Community engagement, identity, and language in the Chicago area. Hispania, 96(2), 310-327.
  • Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory. In B. Inhelder & H.H. Chipman (Eds.), C. Zwingmann (Coordinating Ed.), Piaget and his school: A reader in developmental psychology (p. 11). New York, NY, USA: Springer.
  • Power, A., & Bennett, D. (2015). Moments of becoming: experiences of embodied connection to place in artsbased service learning in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 156-168.
  • Taylor, A. (2017). Service-Learning Programs and the Knowledge Economy: Exploring the Tensions. Vocations and Learning, 10(3), 253-273.
  • Taylor, E. (2009). Transformative learning, In J. Mezirow, E. Taylor, & Associates (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice. San Francisco, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • University of Northern Colorado. Community and Civic Engagement Committee. (2017). Sustaining and Advancing Engagement Plan 2017-2020.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. Social learning systems and communities of practice, 3, 179-198.
  • Whitley, M.A. (2014). A Draft Conceptual Framework of Relevant Theories to Inform Future Rigorous Research on Student Service-Learning Outcomes. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 20(2), 19-40.
  • Wilson, R.E., Bradbury, L.U., & McGlasson, M.A. (2015). Integrating service-learning pedagogy for preservice elementary teachers’ science identity development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 319-340.
  • Winans-Solis, J. (2014). Reclaiming power and identity: Marginalized students’ experiences of servicelearning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 604-621.
  • Woodruff, E.A., & Sinelnikov, O. A. (2015). Teaching young adults with disabilities through service learning. European Physical Education Review, 21(3), 292-308.
  • Yep, K.S. (2014). Reimagining Diversity Work: Multigenerational Learning, Adult Immigrants, and Dialogical Community-Based Learning. Metropolitan Universities, 25(3), 47-66.
  • Young, S., & Karme, T. (2015). Service learning in an Indigenous not-forprofit organization. Education+Training, 57(7), 774-790.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet