Novos elementos na psicoloxía política dos movementos sociaisa obriga moral e o contexto

  1. Xiana Vilas 1
  2. José Mauel Sabucedo 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Grupo Psicologia Social, Cognitiva e Psicometria
  2. 2 Sociedade Espanhola de Psicologia Social
Revista:
Revista Psicología Política

ISSN: 1519-549X

Ano de publicación: 2013

Volume: 13

Número: 28

Páxinas: 437-452

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista Psicología Política

Resumo

Les mouvements sociaux sont des phénomènes qui stimulent nos sociétés et promouvoir le changement social. La psychologie politique tente de clarifier les raisons psychosociales qui favorisent ce comportement. Au cours des dernières années, nous assistons à l'élaboration de propositions théoriques très intéressantes dans ce domaine. Cependant, ces approches ont pas jeté la charge des postes les plus instrumentales. Dans cet article, nous étudions les éléments d'intérêt pour l'analyse de la protestation qui ont été séparés de leur étude depuis longtemps: que l'obligation morale ou le contexte ; et proposer le renouvellement de l'élément de l'instrumentalité. L'obligation morale de participer concerne une poussée intérieure d'agir en concordance avec les principes moraux ; d'autre part les variations contextuelles produisant des effets sur la motivation. De nouveaux modèles d'action collective doivent prendre en compte le rôle des principes moraux et le contexte pour expliquer l'implication de l'individu dans la protestation, sans avoir à supposer que la rationalité de ce type de comportement est de réduire.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bandura, Albert. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 51. 269-290
  • Beaudoux, Virginia. (1999). Psicología política del nuevo siglo: Una ventana a la ciudadanía. Somepso.
  • Caballero, Andreu. (2012). En España se celebraron 23.248 manifestaciones solo en 2011.
  • Duncan, Lauren E.,College, Smith. (2012). Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. Oxford University Press. New York.
  • Amitai, Etzioni. (1970). Demonstration democracy. Gordon & Breach. New York.
  • Festinger, Leon. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. Stanford.
  • Gamson, William A.. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press. Boston^eMA MA.
  • Hornsey, Mathetew J.,Blackwood, Leda,Louis, Winnifred,Fielding, Kelly,Mavor, Ken,Morton, Thomas,White, Katherine M.. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action?: Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 36. 1701-1722
  • Jimenez, Manuel. (2011). La normalización de la protesta: El caso de las manifestaciones en España (1980-2008). Catálogo de Publicaciones de la Administración General del Estado.
  • Klandermans, Bert. (1984). Mobilization and participation: social-psychological explanations of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review. 49. 583-600
  • Klandermans, Bert. (1992). The Frontiers in Social Movements Theory. Yale University Press. New Haven.
  • Klandermans, Bert. (2004). The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford.
  • Klandermans, Bert. (2009). Protest Politics: Antiwar mobilization in advanced industrial democracies. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis.
  • Knoch, Daria,Pascual-leon, Álvaro,Meyer, Kaspar,Treyer, Valerie,Fehr, Ernst. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science. 314. 828-832
  • Le Bon, Gustave. (1896). Psicología de las masas. Editorial Morata. Madrid.
  • Lipovestsky, Gilles. (2002). Metamorfosis de la cultura liberal: Ética, medios de comunicación, empresa. Anagrama. Barcelona.
  • McAdam, Doug,McCarthy, John,Zald, Mayer N.. (1996). Movimientos Sociales: Perspectivas Comparadas. Istmo. Madrid.
  • Melucci, Alberto. (1985). The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements. Social Research. 52. 789-816
  • Meyer, David,Tarrow, Sidney. (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman & Littlefield. Boulder^eCO CO.
  • Morales, José Francisco. (2007). Psicología y Racionalidad.
  • Oberchall, Anthony. (1973). Social conflict and Social Movements. Prentice Hall. New JerseyEnglewood Cliffs.
  • Olson, Mancur. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press. Cambridge^eMassachusset Massachusset.
  • Pinto, Raquel M.. (2009). Los movimientos sociales y los marcos de acción colectiva que apoyan a la lucha contra la precariedad laboral.
  • Rawls, John. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press. ^eMA MA.
  • Runciman, Walter. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul. London^eUK UK.
  • Sabucedo, José Manuel. (1996). Psicología política. Síntesis. Madrid.
  • Sabucedo, José Manuel,Alzate, Mónica. (2005). Un análisis del Mal y sus Consecuencias. Trotta.
  • Sabucedo, José Manuel,Durán, Mar,Alzate, Mónica. (2010). Identidad colectiva movilizada. Revista de psicología social. 25. 189-202
  • Sabucedo, José Manuel,Grossi, Javier,Fernandez, Concepción. (1998). Los movimientos sociales: Transformaciones políticas y cambio cultural. Editorial Trota. Madrid.
  • Schwartz, Shalom H.. (1977). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press. New York.
  • Simon, Bernd,Klandermans, Bert. (2001). Politicized Collective Identity: A Social Psychological Analysis. American Psychologist European Review of Social Psychology. 56. 319-331
  • Skitka, Linda J.,Bauman, Cristopher W.,Sargis, Edward G.. (2005). Moral Conviction: Another Contribution to Attitude Strength or Something More?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 88. 895-917
  • Skitka, Linda J.. (2010). The Psychology of Moral Conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 4. 267-281
  • Stoop, Ineke,Jowell, Roger,Mohler, Peter. (2002). The European Social Survey: One Survey in two Dozen Countries. 25-28
  • Stürmer, Stefan,Simon, Bernd. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology. 15. 59-99
  • Tajfel, Henri,Turner, John. (1979). The social psychology of inter_group relations. Brooks/Cole. Monterey^eCA CA.
  • Tanner, Carmen,Medin, Douglas L.,Iliev, Rumen. (2008). Influence of deontological versus consequentialist orientations on act choices and framing effects: When principles are more important than consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology. 38. 757-769
  • Turain, Alain. (1985). An introduction to the study of social movements. Social Research. 52. 749-787
  • Turner, Ralph H.,Killian, Lewis M.. (1957). Collective Behaviour. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs^eNJ NJ.
  • Van Aelst, Peter,Walgrave, Stefaan. (2001). "Who is that (wo)man in the street?: From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research. 39. 461-486
  • Van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien,Klandermans, Bert,Van Dijk, Wilco. (2009). Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics. Journal of Social Issues. 65. 815-838
  • Van Zomeren, Martijn,Postmes, Tom,Spears, Russell. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three sociopsychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin. 134. 504-535
  • Van Zomeren, Martijn,Spears, Rusell,Fisher, Agneta. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 87. 649-664
  • Vilas, Xiana,Sabucedo, José Manuel. (2012). Moral obligation: A forgotten dimension in the analysis of collective action. Revista de Psicología Social. 27. 369-375
  • Walgrave, Stefaan,Verhulst, Joris. (2004). Internal diversity of protest: A Comparative study of anti-Iraqi-war protest. APSA conference. Chicago. September 2-5, 2004.
  • Walgrave, Stefaan,Vliegenthart, Rens. (2012). The Complex Agenda-Setting Power of Protest: Demonstrations, Media, Parliament, Government, and Legislation in Belgium, 1993-2000. Mobilization: An international Quartely. 17. 129-156
Fonte de datos: Dialnet