El papel de las instituciones en el desarrollo económico de los países PECOB

  1. A. David Carballas 1
  2. Eva Aguayo
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Estudios económicos de desarrollo internacional: Economic studies of international development : EEDI

ISSN: 1578-4479

Ano de publicación: 2006

Volume: 6

Número: 2

Páxinas: 55-70

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Estudios económicos de desarrollo internacional: Economic studies of international development : EEDI

Resumo

El papel de las instituciones, y su efecto sobre el crecimiento económico, ha sido uno de los últimos elementos en incorporarse a la literatura sobre la transición de los países post-socialistas. En este artículo tratamos de destacar la importancia de este factor en el crecimiento de los PECOB (Países de Europa Central Oriental y Bálticos), presentando para ello un modelo econométrico que refleja el efecto beneficioso de una adecuada estructura institucional.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aslund, A. (2001): “The Myth of Output Collapse after Communism”. Carnegie Endowment Working Papers, nº 18.
  • Baltagi, B. (2001): “Econometric Analysis of Panel Data”. John Wiley and Sons, ltd.
  • Blanchard, O. (1997): “The Economics of Post-Communist Transition”. Oxford University Press.
  • Berg, A.; Borenzstein, E.; Sahay, R. Y Zettelmeyer, J. (1999): “The Evolution of Output in Transition Economies: Explaining the Differences”. IMF Working Paper 99/73. International Monetary Fund.
  • Christoffersen, P. y Doyle, P. (1998): “From Inflation to Growth: Eight years of Transition”. IMF Working Paper, WP/98/100.
  • De Melo, M.; Denizer, C. y Gelb, A. (1996): “From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition”. World Bank, Whasington.
  • De Melo, M.; Denizer, C.; Gelb, A. y Tenev, S. (1997): “Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies”. The World Bank, International Finance Corporation.
  • EBRD y World Bank(2002): “Transition: The First Ten Years: Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union”. www.worldbank.org
  • EBRD (2004): “Transition Report 2004: Infrastructures”. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Disponible en: http://www.ebrd.org
  • Fischer, S.; Sahay, R. y Vegh, C. (1996): “Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, nº 2, pp.45-66.
  • Guisan, M.C.; Aguayo, E. y Carballas, D. (2004a): “Economic Growth and Cycles in Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia: A comparison with Spain, Austria and other EU countries, 1950-2002”. Working Paper Series Economic Development nº 79, disponible en: http://www.usc.es/economet
  • Havrylyshyn, O.; Izvorski, I. y Van Rooden, R. (1998): “Recovery and Growth in Transition Economies 1990-97: Stylized Regression Analysis”. IMF Working Paper 98/141.
  • Havrylyshyn, O. (2001): “Recovery and Growth in Transition: A Decade of Evidence”. IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 48, Special Issue.
  • Konings, J. (2003): “Economics of Transition”. Disponible en: http://www.econ.kuleuven.ac.be/licos/joep/konings.htm
  • Kornai, J. (2001): “Hardening the budget constraint: The experience of the postsocialist coutries”. European Economic Review, Volume 45, nº 9.
  • Merlevede, B. (2000a): “Growth in Transition Economies: A review of the Literature”. Faculty of Applied Economics. University of Antwerp.
  • Qian, Y. (2002): “How Reform Worked in China”. The William Davidson Institute Working Paper nº 473.
  • Wykoff, F. (2001): “Creating Capitalism: Politics, Reforms, and Economic Performance. An Econometric Analysis of Six Countries from 1989-1999”. Claremont College Working Paper 2001-17.
  • Zellner, A. (1962): “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias”. JASA, 57, pp. 348-368.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet