El papel de las instituciones en el desarrollo económico de los países PECOB

  1. A. David Carballas 1
  2. Eva Aguayo
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Journal:
Estudios económicos de desarrollo internacional: Economic studies of international development : EEDI

ISSN: 1578-4479

Year of publication: 2006

Volume: 6

Issue: 2

Pages: 55-70

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Estudios económicos de desarrollo internacional: Economic studies of international development : EEDI

Abstract

The role of institutions, and its effect on the economic growth, has been one of the latest elements incorporating to transition literature. In this paper we want to emphasize the key importance of this factor on the economic growth of CEEB countries (Central-Eastern European and Baltic countries), presenting an econometric model that reflects the positive effect on the economic growth of an adequate institutional structure.

Bibliographic References

  • Aslund, A. (2001): “The Myth of Output Collapse after Communism”. Carnegie Endowment Working Papers, nº 18.
  • Baltagi, B. (2001): “Econometric Analysis of Panel Data”. John Wiley and Sons, ltd.
  • Blanchard, O. (1997): “The Economics of Post-Communist Transition”. Oxford University Press.
  • Berg, A.; Borenzstein, E.; Sahay, R. Y Zettelmeyer, J. (1999): “The Evolution of Output in Transition Economies: Explaining the Differences”. IMF Working Paper 99/73. International Monetary Fund.
  • Christoffersen, P. y Doyle, P. (1998): “From Inflation to Growth: Eight years of Transition”. IMF Working Paper, WP/98/100.
  • De Melo, M.; Denizer, C. y Gelb, A. (1996): “From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition”. World Bank, Whasington.
  • De Melo, M.; Denizer, C.; Gelb, A. y Tenev, S. (1997): “Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies”. The World Bank, International Finance Corporation.
  • EBRD y World Bank(2002): “Transition: The First Ten Years: Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union”. www.worldbank.org
  • EBRD (2004): “Transition Report 2004: Infrastructures”. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Disponible en: http://www.ebrd.org
  • Fischer, S.; Sahay, R. y Vegh, C. (1996): “Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, nº 2, pp.45-66.
  • Guisan, M.C.; Aguayo, E. y Carballas, D. (2004a): “Economic Growth and Cycles in Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia: A comparison with Spain, Austria and other EU countries, 1950-2002”. Working Paper Series Economic Development nº 79, disponible en: http://www.usc.es/economet
  • Havrylyshyn, O.; Izvorski, I. y Van Rooden, R. (1998): “Recovery and Growth in Transition Economies 1990-97: Stylized Regression Analysis”. IMF Working Paper 98/141.
  • Havrylyshyn, O. (2001): “Recovery and Growth in Transition: A Decade of Evidence”. IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 48, Special Issue.
  • Konings, J. (2003): “Economics of Transition”. Disponible en: http://www.econ.kuleuven.ac.be/licos/joep/konings.htm
  • Kornai, J. (2001): “Hardening the budget constraint: The experience of the postsocialist coutries”. European Economic Review, Volume 45, nº 9.
  • Merlevede, B. (2000a): “Growth in Transition Economies: A review of the Literature”. Faculty of Applied Economics. University of Antwerp.
  • Qian, Y. (2002): “How Reform Worked in China”. The William Davidson Institute Working Paper nº 473.
  • Wykoff, F. (2001): “Creating Capitalism: Politics, Reforms, and Economic Performance. An Econometric Analysis of Six Countries from 1989-1999”. Claremont College Working Paper 2001-17.
  • Zellner, A. (1962): “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias”. JASA, 57, pp. 348-368.
Data source: Dialnet