Faking resistance of a quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventory without algebraic dependence
ISSN: 1576-5962
Ano de publicación: 2018
Volume: 34
Número: 3
Páxinas: 213-216
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology
Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable
Resumo
ABSTRACT This short research note reports on a study on the robustness of a quasi-ipsative forced-choice (FC) personality inventory for controlling the effects of faking. A sample of 126 active managers was randomly divided in three independent groups, with 42 individuals per group. We used an experimental three-group design in which the independent variable was the instructional set (faking, neutral, and honest), and the dependent variables were the scores in the Big Five personality dimensions. The results showed that the average effect sizes were .01, -.02, and 0 for the comparisons among faking-honest, faking-neutral, and neutral-honest groups. These findings showed that the quasi-ipsative FC format with algebraic non-dependence among the scales is a very robust way of controlling faking. We recommend practitioners to use this technology for making personnel selection decisions.
Información de financiamento
Cite this article as: Salgado, J. F. & Lado, M. (2018). Faking resistance of a quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventory without algebraic dependence. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34, 213-216. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a23 Funding: The research reported in this manuscript was supported by Grant PSI2014-56615-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness and Grant 2016 GPC GI-1458 from the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia. Correspondence: mario.lado@usc.es (M. Lado).Referencias bibliográficas
- Aguado, D,Rico, R,Rubio, V. J,Fernández, L. (2016). Applicant reactions to social network web use in personnel selection. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 32. 183
- Bartram, D. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 69. 25-39
- Birkeland, S,Manson, T,Kisamore, J. L,Brannick, M. T,Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 14. 317
- Christiansen, N. D,Burns, G. N,Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment.. Human Performance. 18. 267-307
- Gleser, L. J. (1972). On bounds for the average correlation between subtest scores in ipsatively scored tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 32. 759
- Grieve, R,Hayes, J. (2016). Employment testing online, offline, and over the phone: Implications for e-assessment. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 32. 95-101
- Heggestad, E. D,Morrison, M,Reeve, C. L,McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessment of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91. 9-24
- Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin. 74. 167
- Horn, J. L. (1971). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Tand McNally. Chicago, Il.
- Jackson, D. N,Wroblewski, V. R,Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution?. Human Performance. 13. 371
- Lado, M,Alonso, P. (2017). The Five-Factor Model and job performance in low complexity jobs: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 33. 175
- Levashina, J,Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring faking in employment interview: Development and validation of an employment faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92. 1638
- Morgeson, F. P,Campion, M. A,Dipboye, R. L,Hollenbeck, J. R,Murphy, K,Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel contexts. Personnel Psychology. 60. 683-729
- Nguyen, N. T,McDaniel, M. A. (2000). Faking and forced choice scales in applicant screening: A meta-analysis.
- Salgado, J. F. (2014). Technical manual for the QI5F. Metis. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
- Salgado, J. F. (2016). A theoretical model of psychometric effects of faking on assessment procedures: Empirical findings and implications for personality at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 24. 209
- Salgado, J. F. (2017). Moderator effects of job complexity on the validity of forced-choice personality inventories for predicting job performance. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 33. 229
- Salgado, J. F,Anderson, N. Tauri. (2015). The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 88. 797-834
- Viswesvaran, C,Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analysis of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60. 197-210