El emprendimiento tecnológico en Suraméricauna aproximación a sus determinantes individuales

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aceytuno Pérez, M. T. & Paz Báñez, M. A. de (2008). La creación de spin-off universitarias. El caso de la Universidad de Huelva. Economía Industrial, (368), 97-111.
• Aldrich, H. (2012). The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41(7), 1240-1248.
• Aldrich, H. & Fiol, M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
• Aldrich, H. & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through Social Networks. En The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23). Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Co.
• Almus, M. & Nerlinger, E. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: Which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141-154.
• Alonso, M., Galve, C. & Hernandez, A. (2006). Creación de Empresas y autoempleo en Europa: periodo 1997-2002. En XVI Jornadas Luso-Espanholas Gestao Cientifica. Inovação e Empreendedorismo para o Século XXI (pp. 354-364). Évora: Universidad de Évora.
• Alvarez, C. & Urbano, D. (2011). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial activity in Latin America. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 48, 31-45.
• Alvarez, S. & Barney, J. (2002). Resource-based theory and the entrepreneurial firm. En Hitt, M., Ireland, R., Camp, S. & Sexton, D. (Eds.). Strategic Entrepreneurship (pp. 89-105). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• Aspelund, A., Berg-Utby, T. & Skjevdal, R. (2005). Initial resources’ influence on new venture survival: A longitudinal study of new technology-based firms. Technovation, 25(11), 1337-1347.
• Autio, E. (1997). Atomistic and systemic approaches to research on new, technology-based firms: A literature study. Small Business Economics, 9(3), 195-209.
• Autio, E., Kanerva, R., Kaila, M. & Kauranen, I. (1989). Uudet teknologiayritykset (New, Technology-Based Firms. Helsinki: SITRA Publication.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
• Bower, D. (2003). Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Management, 33(2), 97-106.
• CEPAL. (2014). Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe. Recuperado de http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/2/53392/EstudioEconomico2014.pdf
• Clarysse, B. & Moray, N. (2004). A Process Study of Entrepreneurial Team Formation: The Case of a Research-based Spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55-79.
• Colombo, M. & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology based firms: a competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795-816.
• Cooper, A. C. (1971). The founding of technologically-Based Firms. Milwaukee: The Center for Venture Management.
• Costa, F. (2006). O capital de risco, a incubacao de empresas e o emprendedorismo: os criterios de seleccao de projectos. XVI Jornadas Luso-Espanholas Gestao Cientifica. Inovação e Empreendedorismo para o Século XXI (pp. 313-323). Évora: Universidad de Évora.
• Cunha, D., Silva, S. & Teixeira, A. (2013). Are Academic Spin-Offs necessarily New Technology-Based firms? (Working Paper 482), Porto: Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Universidade do Porto.
• Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
• Donckels, R. (1989). Tech versus Common Starters: comparison by means of 32 case studies. Bruselas: Small Business Research Institute.
• Fagenson, E. & Jackson, J. (1993). The status of women managers in the United States. International Studies of Management & Organization, 23(2), 93-112.
• Ferreira, J., Raposo, M., Ferreira, F., Jalali, M., Fernandes, C. & Marques, C. (2014). What do we Know About Technology Entrepreneurship Research? 2014 INBAM Conference Annual Meeting, Barcelona.
• Gassler, H. (1998). The regional variation of new technology based firms in Austria. ERSA Conference Papers 38th. Viena: ERSA.
• Gibb, A. (1997). Small Firms Training and Competitiveness. Building Upon the Small Business as a Learning Organisation. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 12-29.
• Giovannetti, G., Ricchiuti, G. & Velucchi, M. (2011). Size, innovation and internationalization: A survival analysis of Italian firms. Applied Economics, 43(12), 1511-1520.
• Goldfarb, B. & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639-658.
• Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. (Working Paper no. 11953). Cambridge, M. A.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Gompers, P., Lerner, J. & Scharfstein, D. (2005). Enterpreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the genesis of New Ventures, 1986 to 1999. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 577-614.
• Greene, P. (2000). Self-employment as an economic behavior: an analysis of self-employed women’s human and social capital. National Journal of Sociology, 12(1), 1-55.
• Harvey, K. (1994). From Handicap to Nice Little Earner: A Study of Academic Spin-Off Enterprise. (Paper). Manchester Business School Conference.
• Hülsbeck, M. & Kitzinger, E. (2011). The impact of regional industries and universities on (high) technology entrepreneurship. (UO Working Paper Series no. 03-11). Augsburg: University of Augsburg.
• Jack, S. & Anderson, A. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467-487.
• Lechner, C., Dowling, M. & Welpe, I. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 514-540.
• Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S. & Rigolini, J. (2014). El emprendimiento en América Latina: muchas empresas y poca innovación. Washington, D. C.: Banco Mundial.
• Mayer, H. (2008). Segmentation and Segregation Patterns of Women-Owned High-Tech Firms in Four Metropolitan Regions in the United States. Regional Studies, 42(10), 1357-1383.
• Murray, F. & Graham, L. (2007). Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial Science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 657-689.
• Neergaard, H., Nielsen, K. & Kjeldsen, J. (2006). State of the art of women’s entrepreneurship, access to financing and financing strategies in Denmark. En Brush, C., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene P. & Hart, M. (Eds.). Growth-oriented Women Entrepreneurs and Their Businesses: A Global Research Perspective (pp. 88-111). Cheltenham, Reino Unido: Edward Elgar.
• O’shea, R., Chugh, H. & Allen, T. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653-666.
• Oakey, R. (1995). High technology new firms: variable barriers to growth. Londres: Paul Chapman Publishing.
• OCDE. (2009). Innovation in firms: A microeconomic perspective. Recuperado de http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9209011E.PDF.
• OECD/ECLAC. (2012). Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2013: Políticas de pymes para el cambio estructural. Recuperado de http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/4/48374/leo_2013.pdf
• Ortín, P., Salas, V., Trujillo, M. & Vendrell, F. (2008). La creación de spin-off universitarios en España: características, determinantes y resultados. Economía Industrial, (368), 79-95.
• Petti, C. & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7-25.
• Roberts, B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyon. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
• Rodríguez, M., Fernández, S., Rodeiro, D. & Vivel, M. (2013). Emprendimiento tecnológico ¿Una cuestión de género también en la universidad? XXIII Jornadas Hispanolusas. Bases para Emprender y Gestionar con Racionalidad y Transparencia (pp. 55-65). Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.
• Rueda, I., Fernández-Laviada, A. & Herrero, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial intention: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 27(2), 284-315.
• Ruiz, J., Camelo, M. & Coduras, A. (2012). Mujer y desafío emprendedor en España. Características y determinantes. Economía Industrial, (383), 13-22.
• Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
• Storey, D. & Tether, B. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26(9), 933-946.
• Vaquero, A., Fernández, S., Vivel, M., López, A., Porto, N. & Filgueira, A. (2011). El papel de la mujer en el campo científico, tecnológico y de transferencia del conocimiento en Galicia. Ourense.
• Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business venturing, 9(1), 153-167.
• Westhead, P. & Storey, D. (1994). An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom. Londrers: HM Stationery Office.
• Xue, J. & Klein, P. (2010). Regional determinants of technology entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(3), 291-308.
• Zapata, G., Fernández, S., Vivel, M., Neira, I. & Rodeiro, D. (2014a). El emprendimiento de base tecnológica; Características diferenciales. En Vence, X. & Rodeiro, D. (Coords.). Innovación y emprendimiento con base en las ciencias (pp. 3-22). Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
• Zapata, G., Fernández, S., Neira, I. & Nogueira, M. (2014b). Factores individuales determinantes del emprendimiento tecnológico: un análisis del caso español. XXIV Jornadas Luso-Espanholas. Gestão Científica. O Contributo da Gestão para a Sustentabilidade das Organizações e da Sociedade. Leiria, Portugal: Instituto Politécnico de Leiria.
• Zhao, H., Scott, E. & Hills, G. (2005). The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.