El emprendimiento tecnológico en Suraméricauna aproximación a sus determinantes individuales

  1. Guillermo Zapata 1
  2. Sara Fernández López 1
  3. Isabel Neira Gómez 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, España
Journal:
Perfiles latinoamericanos: revista de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede México

ISSN: 0188-7653 2309-4982

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 26

Issue: 52

Type: Article

More publications in: Perfiles latinoamericanos: revista de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede México

Abstract

This paper analyses the individual determinants of technological entrepreneurship and whether they differ from those of the conventional entrepreneurship in South America. This paper contributes to the understanding of New Technology-Based Firms (nebts) to foster innovation-based economies in the region. Using logit models and the data from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (gem) 2011, we find that employment status, income, perceived skills and meeting an entrepreneur are driving forces for entrepreneurship. However the gender, age and studies exclusively impact on technological entrepreneurship.

Bibliographic References

  • Aceytuno Pérez, M. T. & Paz Báñez, M. A. de (2008). La creación de spin-off universitarias. El caso de la Universidad de Huelva. Economía Industrial, (368), 97-111.
  • Aldrich, H. (2012). The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41(7), 1240-1248.
  • Aldrich, H. & Fiol, M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
  • Aldrich, H. & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through Social Networks. En The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23). Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Co.
  • Almus, M. & Nerlinger, E. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: Which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141-154.
  • Alonso, M., Galve, C. & Hernandez, A. (2006). Creación de Empresas y autoempleo en Europa: periodo 1997-2002. En XVI Jornadas Luso-Espanholas Gestao Cientifica. Inovação e Empreendedorismo para o Século XXI (pp. 354-364). Évora: Universidad de Évora.
  • Alvarez, C. & Urbano, D. (2011). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial activity in Latin America. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 48, 31-45.
  • Alvarez, S. & Barney, J. (2002). Resource-based theory and the entrepreneurial firm. En Hitt, M., Ireland, R., Camp, S. & Sexton, D. (Eds.). Strategic Entrepreneurship (pp. 89-105). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Aspelund, A., Berg-Utby, T. & Skjevdal, R. (2005). Initial resources’ influence on new venture survival: A longitudinal study of new technology-based firms. Technovation, 25(11), 1337-1347.
  • Autio, E. (1997). Atomistic and systemic approaches to research on new, technology-based firms: A literature study. Small Business Economics, 9(3), 195-209.
  • Autio, E., Kanerva, R., Kaila, M. & Kauranen, I. (1989). Uudet teknologiayritykset (New, Technology-Based Firms. Helsinki: SITRA Publication.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
  • Bower, D. (2003). Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Management, 33(2), 97-106.
  • CEPAL. (2014). Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe. Recuperado de http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/2/53392/EstudioEconomico2014.pdf
  • Clarysse, B. & Moray, N. (2004). A Process Study of Entrepreneurial Team Formation: The Case of a Research-based Spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55-79.
  • Colombo, M. & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology based firms: a competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795-816.
  • Cooper, A. C. (1971). The founding of technologically-Based Firms. Milwaukee: The Center for Venture Management.
  • Costa, F. (2006). O capital de risco, a incubacao de empresas e o emprendedorismo: os criterios de seleccao de projectos. XVI Jornadas Luso-Espanholas Gestao Cientifica. Inovação e Empreendedorismo para o Século XXI (pp. 313-323). Évora: Universidad de Évora.
  • Cunha, D., Silva, S. & Teixeira, A. (2013). Are Academic Spin-Offs necessarily New Technology-Based firms? (Working Paper 482), Porto: Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Universidade do Porto.
  • Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
  • Donckels, R. (1989). Tech versus Common Starters: comparison by means of 32 case studies. Bruselas: Small Business Research Institute.
  • Fagenson, E. & Jackson, J. (1993). The status of women managers in the United States. International Studies of Management & Organization, 23(2), 93-112.
  • Ferreira, J., Raposo, M., Ferreira, F., Jalali, M., Fernandes, C. & Marques, C. (2014). What do we Know About Technology Entrepreneurship Research? 2014 INBAM Conference Annual Meeting, Barcelona.
  • Gassler, H. (1998). The regional variation of new technology based firms in Austria. ERSA Conference Papers 38th. Viena: ERSA.
  • Gibb, A. (1997). Small Firms Training and Competitiveness. Building Upon the Small Business as a Learning Organisation. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 12-29.
  • Giovannetti, G., Ricchiuti, G. & Velucchi, M. (2011). Size, innovation and internationalization: A survival analysis of Italian firms. Applied Economics, 43(12), 1511-1520.
  • Goldfarb, B. & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639-658.
  • Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. (Working Paper no. 11953). Cambridge, M. A.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Gompers, P., Lerner, J. & Scharfstein, D. (2005). Enterpreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the genesis of New Ventures, 1986 to 1999. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 577-614.
  • Greene, P. (2000). Self-employment as an economic behavior: an analysis of self-employed women’s human and social capital. National Journal of Sociology, 12(1), 1-55.
  • Harvey, K. (1994). From Handicap to Nice Little Earner: A Study of Academic Spin-Off Enterprise. (Paper). Manchester Business School Conference.
  • Hülsbeck, M. & Kitzinger, E. (2011). The impact of regional industries and universities on (high) technology entrepreneurship. (UO Working Paper Series no. 03-11). Augsburg: University of Augsburg.
  • Jack, S. & Anderson, A. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467-487.
  • Lechner, C., Dowling, M. & Welpe, I. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 514-540.
  • Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S. & Rigolini, J. (2014). El emprendimiento en América Latina: muchas empresas y poca innovación. Washington, D. C.: Banco Mundial.
  • Mayer, H. (2008). Segmentation and Segregation Patterns of Women-Owned High-Tech Firms in Four Metropolitan Regions in the United States. Regional Studies, 42(10), 1357-1383.
  • Murray, F. & Graham, L. (2007). Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial Science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 657-689.
  • Neergaard, H., Nielsen, K. & Kjeldsen, J. (2006). State of the art of women’s entrepreneurship, access to financing and financing strategies in Denmark. En Brush, C., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene P. & Hart, M. (Eds.). Growth-oriented Women Entrepreneurs and Their Businesses: A Global Research Perspective (pp. 88-111). Cheltenham, Reino Unido: Edward Elgar.
  • O’shea, R., Chugh, H. & Allen, T. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653-666.
  • Oakey, R. (1995). High technology new firms: variable barriers to growth. Londres: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • OCDE. (2009). Innovation in firms: A microeconomic perspective. Recuperado de http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9209011E.PDF.
  • OECD/ECLAC. (2012). Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2013: Políticas de pymes para el cambio estructural. Recuperado de http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/4/48374/leo_2013.pdf
  • Ortín, P., Salas, V., Trujillo, M. & Vendrell, F. (2008). La creación de spin-off universitarios en España: características, determinantes y resultados. Economía Industrial, (368), 79-95.
  • Petti, C. & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7-25.
  • Roberts, B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyon. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rodríguez, M., Fernández, S., Rodeiro, D. & Vivel, M. (2013). Emprendimiento tecnológico ¿Una cuestión de género también en la universidad? XXIII Jornadas Hispanolusas. Bases para Emprender y Gestionar con Racionalidad y Transparencia (pp. 55-65). Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.
  • Rueda, I., Fernández-Laviada, A. & Herrero, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial intention: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 27(2), 284-315.
  • Ruiz, J., Camelo, M. & Coduras, A. (2012). Mujer y desafío emprendedor en España. Características y determinantes. Economía Industrial, (383), 13-22.
  • Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  • Storey, D. & Tether, B. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26(9), 933-946.
  • Vaquero, A., Fernández, S., Vivel, M., López, A., Porto, N. & Filgueira, A. (2011). El papel de la mujer en el campo científico, tecnológico y de transferencia del conocimiento en Galicia. Ourense.
  • Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business venturing, 9(1), 153-167.
  • Westhead, P. & Storey, D. (1994). An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom. Londrers: HM Stationery Office.
  • Xue, J. & Klein, P. (2010). Regional determinants of technology entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(3), 291-308.
  • Zapata, G., Fernández, S., Vivel, M., Neira, I. & Rodeiro, D. (2014a). El emprendimiento de base tecnológica; Características diferenciales. En Vence, X. & Rodeiro, D. (Coords.). Innovación y emprendimiento con base en las ciencias (pp. 3-22). Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
  • Zapata, G., Fernández, S., Neira, I. & Nogueira, M. (2014b). Factores individuales determinantes del emprendimiento tecnológico: un análisis del caso español. XXIV Jornadas Luso-Espanholas. Gestão Científica. O Contributo da Gestão para a Sustentabilidade das Organizações e da Sociedade. Leiria, Portugal: Instituto Politécnico de Leiria.
  • Zhao, H., Scott, E. & Hills, G. (2005). The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.