¿Por qué y cómo se está extendiendo el Manifiesto Project a América Latina?

  1. Cristina Ares 1
  2. Andrea Volkens 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Social Science Research Center Berlin
    info

    Social Science Research Center Berlin

    Berlín, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/03k0z2z93

Revista:
Revista española de ciencia política

ISSN: 1575-6548

Ano de publicación: 2017

Número: 43

Páxinas: 115-135

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.21308/RECP.43.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista española de ciencia política

Resumo

This piece of research examines the inclusion of Latin American democracies into the Manifesto Project´s database –named Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) since 2009–. It addresses some theoretical and conceptual implications related to the study of the functioning of delegation chains in presidential regimes from MARPOR´s perspective. Particularly, it is here analyzed the meaning of electoral programs in parliamentary and presidential systems. Besides, it is explained the revision of the standard classification scheme and other adjustments introduced to the methodology prior to this extension. Lastly, the protocol applied for gathering Latin-American parties and candidates’ manifestos is shared

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alcántara Sáez, Manuel (dir.). 1994-2018. Proyecto Élites Parlamentarias de América Latina. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
  • Alcántara Sáez, Manuel (ed.). 2008. Politicians and Politics in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Alcántara Sáez, Manuel y Mercedes García Montero (eds.). 2011. Algo más que presidentes. El papel del poder legislativo en América Latina. Zaragoza: Fundación Manuel Giménez Abad.
  • Alcántara Sáez, Manuel y Lina M. Cabezas Rincón (eds.). 2013. Selección de candidatos y elaboración de programas en los partidos políticos. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Alonso, Sonia, Braulio Gómez y Laura Cabeza. 2013. «Measuring Centre-Periphery Preferences: The Regional Manifestos Project», Regional and Federal Studies, 23 (2): 189-211. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2012.754351.
  • Alonso, Sonia, Andrea Volkens y Braulio Gómez. 2012. Análisis de contenido de textos políticos. Un enfoque cuantitativo. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Bruhn, Kathleen. 2004. «Globalization and the renovation of the Latin American left: Strategies of ideological adaptation», en Congreso de la Asociación de Ciencia Política del Medio Oeste, Chicago.
  • Bruhn, Kathleen. 2006. «Party ideology and issue stability. Is the Mexican party system consolidating?», en Encuentro Anual de la Asociación Americana de Ciencia Política, Filadelfia.
  • Budge, Ian. 2000. «Expert judgements of party policy positions: Uses and limitations in political research», European Journal of Political Research, 37: 103-113. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00506.
  • Budge, Ian y Dennis Farlie. 1983. Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London Allen and Unwin.
  • Budge, Ian, David Robertson y Derek Hearl (eds.). 1987. Ideology, strategy and party change. Spatial analysis of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping policy preferences. Estimates for parties, electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Colomer, Joseph M. y Luis E. Escatel. 2004. The left-right dimension in Latin America. México: CIDE.
  • Dalton, Russell J. 1985. «Political parties and political representation: Party supporters and party elites in nine nations», Comparative Political Studies, 18: 267−299. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414085018003001.
  • Dalton, Russell J. 1996. Citizen politics. Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.
  • Eulau, Heinz. 1987. «The congruence model revisited», Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12: 171−214. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/439918.
  • Foweraker, Joe. 1998. «Review article: Institutional design, party systems and governability. Differentiating the presidential regimes of Latin America», British Journal of Political Science, 28: 651−676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123498000295.
  • García Montero, Mercedes. 2009. Presidentes y Parlamentos ¿Quién controla la actividad legislativa en América Latina? Madrid: CIS.
  • Gemenis, Kostas. 2013. «What to do (and not to do) with the comparative Manifestos Project Data», Political Studies 61 (1): 3–23. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12015.
  • Golder, Matt. 2005. «Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946−2000», Electoral Studies, 24: 103−121. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2004.02.008.
  • Hagopian, Frances y Scott P. Mainwaring (eds.). 2005. The third wave of democratization in Latin America. Advances and setbacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hellwig, Timothy y David J. Samuels. 2007. «Electoral accountability and the variety of democratic regimes», British Journal of Political Science, 37: 1−26.
  • Huber, John D. y Bingham Powell. 1994. «Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy», World Politics, 46: 291−326. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/2950684.
  • Keman, Hans. 2002. «Democratic institutions, governance and political performance», en Hans Keman (ed.), Comparative democratic politics (pp. 257−285). London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144 6217528.n12.
  • Lacewell, Onawa, Andrea Volkens y Annika Werner. 2014. Manifesto coding instructions. Disponible en: https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/information/documents/handbooks [Consulta: el 11 de enero de 2017].
  • Laver, Michael J., Kenneth Benoit y John Garry. 2003. «Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data», American Political Science Review, 97 (2): 311-31. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000698.
  • Laver, Michael J., Kenneth Benoit y Nicolas Sauger. 2006. «Policy competition in the 2002 French legislative and presidential elections», European Journal of Political Research, 45 (4): 667−697. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00313.x.
  • Lehmann, Pola, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, Annika Werner. 2016. The Manifesto Data Collection: South America. Berlín: Centro de Ciencias Sociales (WZB). Disponible en: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasets [Consulta: el 11 de enero de 2017].
  • Linz, Juan y Arturo Valenzuela (eds.). 1994. The failure of presidential democracy. Volume 1: Comparative perspectives; Volume 2: The case of Latin America. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • López Varas, Miguel A. y Jaime Baeza Freer. 2010. «The Chilean Right Party’s appeal to the electorate: A party manifesto analysis, 1989-2009», en XXIX Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Estudios Latinoamericanos, Toronto.
  • Mainwaring, Scott y Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1997. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174800.
  • Merkel, Wolfgang, Hans-Jürgen Puhle, Aurel Croissant, Claudia Eicher y Peter Thiery. 2003. Defekte Demokratie, Band 1: Theorie. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Merz, Nicolas, Sven Regel y Jirka Lewandowski. 2016. «The Manifesto Corpus. A New Resource for Research on Political Parties and Quantitative Text Analysis», Research and Politics, 26 (4), 1-8. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016643346.
  • Müller, Wolfgang C. 2000. «Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work», European Journal of Political Research, 37 (3): 309–333. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00515.
  • Müller, Wolfgang C. y Kaare Strøm. 2000. «Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies», European Journal of Political Research, 37: 255-260. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00515.
  • Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, Katja Fettelschoss y Philipp Harfst. 2004. «Party Government in Central Eastern European democracies: A data collection», European Journal of Political Research, 43: 869−893. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00178.x.
  • Nohlen, Dieter (ed.). 2005. Elections in the Americas. A data handbook. Volume I: North America, Central America, and the Caribbean; Volume II: South America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. «Delegative democracy», Journal of Democracy, 5: 55−69. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010.
  • Persson, Torsten y Guido Tabellini. 2003. The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge, Londres: The MIT Press.
  • Petrocik, John R. 1996. «Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study», American Journal of Political Science, 40 (3): 825-850. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797.
  • Robertson, David. 1976. A theory of party competition. London: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Rose, Richard. 2000. «A supply-side view of Russia’s elections», East European Constitutional Review, 9: 53−59.
  • Ruiz Rodríguez, Leticia M. 2007. La coherencia partidista en América Latina. Parlamentarios y partidos. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
  • Samuels, David y Mathew S. Shugart. 2003. «Presidentialism, elections and representation», Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15: 33−60. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803151002.
  • Samuels, David J. y Mathew S. Shugart. 2010. Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: How the separation of powers affects party organization and behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780882.
  • Shugart, Mathew S. y John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and assemblies. Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988.
  • Stokes, Donald E. 1963. «Spatial models of party competition», American Political Science Review, 57: 368-377. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952828.
  • Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and democracy: Neoliberalism by surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612978.
  • Thomassen, Jacques J. A. 1991. «Empirical research into political representation. A critical reappraisal«, en Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Richard Stöss y Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Politische Klasse und politische Institutionen. Probleme und Perspektiven der Elitenforschung. Dietrich Herzog zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 259−274). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94153-4_11.
  • Thomassen, Jacques J. A. 1994. «Empirical research into political representation: Failing democracy or failing models», en M. Kent Jennings y Thomas E. Mann (eds.), Elections at home and abroad: Essays in honor of Warren E. Miller (237-264). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Thomassen, Jacques J.A. 1999. Political communication between political elites and mass public. The role of belief systems, en Warren E. Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques J.A. Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson y Peter Weßels, Policy Representation in Western Democracies (pp. 33−58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Volkens, Andrea. 2007. «Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy postions of parties», Electoral Studies, 26: 108-120. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.003.
  • Volkens, Andrea, Cristina Ares, Radostina Bratanova y Lea Kaftan. 2015. Scope, range, and extent of Manifesto Project data usage: A survey of publications in eight high-impact journals. Handbook for data users and coders. Diponible en: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/publications/all [Consulta: el 11 de enero de 2017].
  • Volkens, Andrea, Cristina Ares y Nicolas Merz. 2014. «Range, scope, and extent of MARPOR data usage and validation: A survey of publications in high-impact journals», en el Congreso Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts, Berlín: MARPOR, Centro de Ciencias Sociales de Berlín.
  • Volkens, Andrea, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael McDonald y Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.). 2013. Mapping policy preferences from texts III. Statistical solutions for Manifesto analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Volkens, Andrea y Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 2005. «Parties, ideologies, and issues: Stability and change in fifteen european party systems 1945-1998, en Richard Luther y Ferdinand Müller-Rommel (eds.), Political Parties in the New Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß y Sven Regel. 2016. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlín: Centro de Ciencias Sociales (WZB). Disponible en: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasets [Consulta: el 11 de enero de 2017].
  • Wiesehomeier, Nina y Kenneth Benoit. 2009. «Presidents, parties, and policy competition», The Journal of Politics, 71(4): 1435-47. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990193.
  • Wiesehomeier, Nina. 2010. The meaning of left-right in Latin America: A comparative view. Kellog Working Paper.
  • Woldendorp, Jaap, Hans Keman y Ian Budge. 2000. Party government in 48 democracies (1945-1998): Composition, duration, personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2547-7.
  • Würst, Andreas M. y Andrea Volkens. 2003. Euromanifesto coding instructions. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim.
  • Zulianello, Mattia. 2014. «Analyzing Party Competition through the Comparative Manifesto Data: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations», Quality & Quantity, 48 (3): 1723–37. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9870-0.