Scope, Range, and Extent of Manifesto Project Data Usagea New Research Tool for Manifesto Project Database’s Users

  1. Volkens, Andrea 1
  2. Ares, Cristina 2
  3. Bratanova, Radostina 1
  4. Kaftan, Lea 1
  1. 1 Social Science Research Center Berlin
    info

    Social Science Research Center Berlin

    Berlín, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/03k0z2z93

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

ISSN: 1577-239X

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 14

Número: 2

Páginas: 215-232

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15304/RIPS.14.2.2896 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

Resumen

The objective of this research note is to introduce Scope, Range, and Extent of Manifesto Project Data Usage  (SRE). This is a content analysis of publications that use the Manifesto Projects´s Database, its resulting dataset, and a handbook for users and forthcoming coders.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BENOIT, Kenneth/Michael LAVER/Slava MIKHAYLOV (2009): “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions”, American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 495–513.
  • BUDGE, Ian/David ROBERTSON/Derek HEARL (eds.) (1987): Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, reprinted in paperback in 2008.
  • BUDGE, Ian/Hans-Dieter KLINGEMANN/Andrea VOLKENS/Judith BARA et al. (2001): Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press, including CD-ROM with MRG/CMP data for 25 countries 1945–1998.
  • CAMPBELL, Donald T./Donald W. FISKE (1959): “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix”, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81.
  • FRANZMANN, Simon/André KAISER (2006): “Locating Political Parties in Policy Space. A Reanalysis of Party Manifesto Data”, Party Politics, 12(2), 163–188. DOI: 10.1177/1354068806061336
  • GABEL, Matthew J./John D. HUBER (2000): “Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data”, American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 94–103.
  • KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter/Richard I. HOFFERBERT/Ian BUDGE et al. (1994): Parties, Policies, and Democracy, Boulder: Westview Press.
  • KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter/Andrea VOLKENS/Judith BARA/Ian BUDGE/ Michael MCDONALD (2006): Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990−2003, Oxford: Oxford University Press, including CD-ROM with MRG/CMP data for 51 countries 1990 to 2003.
  • LAVER, Michael/Ian BUDGE (eds.) (1992): Party Policy and Coalition Government, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • LOWE, Will/Kenneth BENOIT/Slava MIKHAYLOV/Michael LAVER (2011): “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 123–155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x.
  • POWELL, G. Bingham (2009): “The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules”, Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1475–1497. DOI: 10.1177/0010414009332147
  • ROBERTSON, David (1976): A Theory of Party Competition, London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • VOLKENS, Andrea/Judith BARA/Ian BUDGE/Michael MCDONALD/HansDieter KLINGEMANN (eds.) (2013): Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts III. Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet