Análisis de contenido de textos con referencias al Manifesto Project (2000-2015)temas, actores, y métodos para medir preferencias políticas

  1. Volkens, Andrea 1
  2. Ares, Cristina 2
  3. Bratanova, Radostina 1
  4. Kaftan, Lea 1
  1. 1 Social Science Research Center Berlin
    info

    Social Science Research Center Berlin

    Berlín, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/03k0z2z93

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

ISSN: 1577-239X

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 14

Número: 2

Páxinas: 233-238

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15304/RIPS.14.2.2895 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

Resumo

El objetivo de esta nota es dar a conocer a los usuarios de la base de datos del Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) o Manifesto Project el nuevo proyecto Scope, Range, and Extent of Manifesto Project Data Usage (SRE), basado en el análisis de contenido de textos que inluyen alguna referencia a MARPOR, y que comprende aspectos tanto sustantivos como metodológicos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALONSO, Sonia/Andrea VOLKENS/ Braulio GOMEZ, (2012): Análisis de contenido de textos políticos. Un enfoque cuantitativo. Cuadernos metodológicos, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 160.
  • BENOIT, Kenneth/Michael LAVER/Slava MIKHAYLOV (2009): “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions”, American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 495–513.
  • BUDGE, Ian/David ROBERTSON/Derek HEARL (eds.) (1987): Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • BUDGE, Ian/Hans-Dieter KLINGEMANN/Andrea VOLKENS/Judith BARA et al. (2001): Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • CAMPBELL, Donald T./Donald W. FISKE (1959): “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix”, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81.
  • FRANZMANN, Simon/André KAISER (2006): “Locating Political Parties in Policy Space. A Reanalysis of Party Manifesto Data”, Party Politics, 12(2), 163–188. DOI: 10.1177/1354068806061336.
  • GABEL, Matthew J./John D. HUBER (2000): “Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data”, American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 94–103.
  • KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter/Richard I. HOFFERBERT/Ian BUDGE et al. (1994): Parties, Policies, and Democracy, Boulder: Westview Press.
  • KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter/Andrea VOLKENS/Judith BARA/Ian BUDGE/ Michael MCDONALD (2006): Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990−2003, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • LAVER, Michael/Ian BUDGE (eds.) (1992): Party Policy and Coalition Government, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • LOWE, Will/Kenneth BENOIT/Slava MIKHAYLOV/Michael LAVER (2011): “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 123–155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x.
  • POWELL, G. Bingham (2009): “The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules”, Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1475–1497. DOI: 10.1177/0010414009332147.
  • ROBERTSON, David (1976): A Theory of Party Competition, London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • VOLKENS, Andrea/Judith BARA/Ian BUDGE/Michael MCDONALD/HansDieter KLINGEMANN (eds.) (2013): Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts III. Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet