Proyección de tablas input-output birregionales y cuantificación del cross-hauling.

  1. Pereira López, Xesús 1
  2. Ramos, Pedro 2
  3. Sargento, Ana Lúcia 3
  4. Carrascal Incera, André 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Universidade de Coimbra
    info

    Universidade de Coimbra

    Coímbra, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/04z8k9a98

  3. 3 Instituto Politécnico de Leiria
    info

    Instituto Politécnico de Leiria

    Leiria, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/010dvvh94

Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Anales de ASEPUMA

ISSN: 2171-892X

Ano de publicación: 2013

Número: 21

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Anales de ASEPUMA

Resumo

A first approximation of the intermediate consumption matrix is necessary in the process of regionalization of national input-output tables, according to the available information at regional level. Different possibilities appear for this adjustment as could be: using location quotients, gravity models or commodity balance. Then, the most efficient solution should be searched by correction methods. The use of location quotients is correct to generate domestic tables, but their traditional formulations do not detect cross-hauling and, therefore, it involves an overestimation of the domestic intermediate consumption. This paper proposes a modification of this formulation smoothing magnitudes that interfere with the updating processes, so it is feasible to estimate gross exports and imports matrices. For practical purposes, a calibration procedure will be formalized in order to optimize the results of the bi-regional table between Galicia and the rest of Spain. This last test is possible because there are enough data included in the regional input-output framework.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, R.; Lecomber, J. (1975): Some Test on a Generalized Version of RAS, in Allen, R.; Gossling, W. [eds.]: Estimating and Projecting Input-Output Coefficients, Input-Output Publishing Company. London. 43-54.
  • Bacharach, M. (1970): Biproportional Matrices and Input-Output Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Bakhtiari, S.; Dehghanizadeh, M. (2012): “Proposing a New Version of Location Quotients for Estimating Regional Input–Output Coefficients: A Case Study of Iran’s Yazd Province”, African Journal of Business Management, 6(23),6903-6909.
  • Barata, E.; Cruz, L.; Sargento, A.; Ramos, P. y Ferreira J. (2011): “Deriving Regional Input-Output Matrices to Assess Impacts in Small Portuguese Peripheral Regions”. IV Spanish Conference on Input Output Analysis – Strategic Sectors for a New Economic Model, Madrid 28-30 de septiembre.
  • Flegg, T. (2012): “A Comment on Tobias Kronenberg´s «Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of CrossHauling»”, International Regional Science Review, DOI: 10.1177/0160017612-446371.
  • Flegg, A.T.; Webber, C.D. (1996a): “Using Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers”, Local Economic Quarterly, 4,58-86.
  • Flegg, A.T.; Webber, C.D. (1996b): “The FLQ Formula for Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: an Application and Reformation”, Working Papers in Economics, 17, University of the West of England, Bristol.
  • Flegg, A.T.; Eliott, M.V.; Webber, C.D. (1997): “On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables”, Regional Studies, 31(8), 795-805.
  • Flegg, A.T.; Webber, C.D. (2000): “Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula”, Regional Studies, 34(6), 563-569.
  • Isard, W. (1953): “Regional Commodity Balances and Interregional Commodity Flows”, American Economic Review, 43, 167-180.
  • Jensen, R.C.; Mandeville, T.D. y Karunaratne, N.D. (1979): Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input-Output, Croom Helm Ltd., London.
  • Kronenberg, T. (2009): “Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling”, International Regional Science Review, 32(1), 40-64.
  • Kronenberg, T.; Többen, J. (2011): “Regional Input-Output Modeling in Germany: The Case of North Rhine-Westphalia”, MPRA, 35494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Mccann, P.; Dewhurst, J.H.L. (1998): “Regional Size, Industrial Location and Input-Output Expenditure Coefficients”, Regional Studies, 32(5), 435-444.
  • Miller, R.E. y Blair, P.D. (2009): Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Morrison, W.I.; Smith, P. (1974): “Non-Survey Input-Output Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation”, Journal of Regional Science, 14(1), 1-14.
  • Norcliffe, G.D. (1983): “Using Location Quotients to Estimate the Economic Base and Trade Flows”, Regional Studies, 17(3), 161-168.
  • Pereira, X.; Carrascal, A. y Fernández, M. (2013): “Cocientes de Localización mediante una Doble Parametrización”, Working Papers Iberian Regional Economics Network, 6.
  • Round, J.I. (1978): “An Inter-regional Input-Output Approach to the Evaluation of Non-Survey Methods”, Journal of Regional Science, 18(2), 179-194.
  • Sawyer, C.H.; Miller R.E. (1983): “Experiments in Regionalization of a National Input-Output Table”, Environment and Planning A, 15(11), 1501-1520.
  • Schaffer, A. ; Chu, A. (1969): “Non-survey Techniques for Constructing Regional Interindustry Models”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 23, 83-101.
  • Stone, R.; Brown, A. (1962): A Computable Model of Economic Growth. Chapman and Hall. London.
  • Szyrmer, J. (1989): Trade-off between Error and Information in the RAS Procedure, in Miller, R.; Polenske, K.; Rose, A. [eds.]: Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis, Oxford University Press. New York. 258-278.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet