Cambio de paradigmaun análisis bibliográfico de la literatura reciente en ética animal

  1. Dorado, Daniel 1
  2. Horta, Oscar 2
  1. 1 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ths8210

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Journal:
Dilemata

ISSN: 1989-7022

Year of publication: 2014

Issue Title: Actualidad de las éticas aplicadas, cinco años después

Issue: 15

Pages: 103-112

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Dilemata

Abstract

This paper examines how the question of speciesism and the moral consideration of nonhuman animals has been addressed in recent years in the academic world in Spanish speaking countries. It does so by examining the literature on this issue which has been published in Spanish between 2009 and 2014. The paper points out that the attention the issue has received is far from negligible and outlines out the main topics and positions that have been addressed and defended in the literature (which includes general approaches opposing animal exploitation or speciesism, views supporting speciesism and positions in favor of helping animals in nature in opposition to what environmentalist views claim). The paper concludes that research on this topic is likely to receive growing attention in the future.

Bibliographic References

  • Cowen, Tyler (2003): “Policing nature”, Environmental Ethics, 25 (2), 169-182
  • Cunha, Luciano Carlos (2011): “O princípio da beneficência e os animais não-humanos: uma discussão sobre o problema da predação e outros danos naturais”, Ágora: Papeles de Filosofía, 30 (2), 99-131.
  • Díaz Carmona, Estela (2012): “Perfil del vegano/a activista de liberación animal en España”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 139, 175-187.
  • Faria, Catia (2011): “Sobre o bem de tudo e de todos: a conjunção impossível entre ambientalismo e libertação animal”, Ágora: Papeles de Filosofía, 30 (2), 27-41.
  • Gompertz, Lewis (1997 [1824]): Moral inquiries on the situation of man and of brutes, London: Open Gate.
  • Horta, Oscar (2013): “Zoopolis, intervention and the state of nature”, Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 1, 113-125.
  • Magel, Charles (1989): Keyguide to information sources in animal rights, London: Mansell.
  • Margoliouth, David S. (1902): “Abu’l-’Ala al-Ma’arri’s correspondence on vegetarianism”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 34, 289-332.
  • Ng, Yew-Kwang (1995): “Towards welfare biology: Evolutionary economics of animal consciousness and suffering”, Biology and Philosophy, 10 (3), 255-285.
  • Plutarco (2004 [ca. 100]): Obras morales y de costumbres, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Porfirio (1984 [ca. 300]): Sobre la abstinencia, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Ryder, Richard D. (2010): “Speciesism again: The original leaflet”, Critical Society, 2, 1-2.
  • Salt, Henry S. (1999 [1894]): Los derechos de los animales, Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
  • Sorabji, Richard (1995): Animal minds and human morals: The origins of the western debate, Ithaca: Cornell University Press;
  • Sözmen, Beril I., (2013): “Harm in the wild: Facing non-human suffering in nature”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16 (5), 1075-1088.
Data source: Dialnet