How are spoken skills assessed in proficiency tests of general English as a foreign language? A preliminary survey
- Roca Varela, María Luisa
- Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
ISSN: 1578-7044
Ano de publicación: 2013
Título do exemplar: Second language testing: interfaces between pedagogy and assessment
Volume: 13
Número: 2
Páxinas: 53-68
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: IJES: international journal of English studies
Resumo
This paper examines some of the best known proficiency tests in English, with particular focus on the oral component. Attention is paid to the following issues, among others: the weighting of oral elements in testing, the criteria used for the assessment of oral skills and the relation of these to the general guidelines in the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), and the kinds of tasks and marking systems used for assessment. Our aim is to evaluate these tests as a means of determining the extent to which they can be considered valid tools for the assessment of oral performance, considering their significance, relevance and implications in the broader context of the modern world. We contend that, as is the case with teaching processes in general, which need to be continuously evaluated and reformulated, this is true of English testing, especially oral skills, given the special nature of the spoken language
Referencias bibliográficas
- Alderson, J. C. & Wall, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.
- Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for Washback: A Review of the Washback Concept in Language Testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257-279.
- Chapelle, C. (2008). Utilizing Technology in Language Assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 7. Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 123-134). New York: Springer.
- Cheng, L. (2008). Washback, Impact and Consequences. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 7. Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 349-364). New York: Springer.
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Council of Europe. (2009). Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR): A Manual. Strasbourg.
- Davies, A. (1990). Principles of Language Testing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- French, A. (2003). The Development of a Set of Assessment Criteria for Speaking Tests. Research Notes, 13, 8-16.
- Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing Second Language Speaking. London: Longman.
- Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment. New York: Routledge.
- Galaczi, E. (2005). Upper Main Suite Speaking Assessment: Towards an Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Oral Examiner Behaviour. Research Notes, 20, 16-19.
- Heaton, J. B. (1990). Classroom Testing. New York: Longman.
- Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role Play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Linn, R. & Gronlund, N. (2000). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
- Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mauranen, A. & Ranta, E. (Eds.). (2009). English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Selinker, D. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 10(3), 209-231.
- Underhill, N. (1987). Testing Spoken Language. A Handbook of Oral Testing Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Weir, C. (2010). Limitations of the Common European Framework for Developing Comparable Examinations and Tests. Language Testing, 27, 261-282.
- Xi, X. (2008). Methods of Test Validation. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 7. Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 177-196). New York: Springer.