Construcción del discurso legitimador del terrorismo
- Sabucedo Cameselle, José Manuel
- Rodríguez, Mauro
- Fernández Fernández, Concepción
ISSN: 0214-9915
Ano de publicación: 2002
Título do exemplar: Especial Violencia
Volume: 14
Número: 1
Páxinas: 72-77
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Psicothema
Resumo
In principle, the use of violence and terror to achieve political objectives proposes a dilemma: on one hand, it may be an efficient means to an end, but on the other it is a direct attack on the moral codes of most societies. For this latter reason, the groups which chose to use violence need to construct a discourse which legitimises their actions, making it possible for them to obtain support from some sections of society. The following elements are used in constructing this discourse: the existence of a conflict which is of great relevance to the group, blaming their adversaries for the existing state of violence, delegitimising victims, and victimising the aggressor group.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Apter, D. (1997). The legilimisation of violence. Nueva York: Nueva York University Press.
- Aron, R. (l 962). Paix et guerre entre fes nations. París: Calmann Levy.
- Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society. Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Funes, M. (1998). Social responses to political violence in the Basque country. Peace movement and their audience. Journal of Conflict Resolution,42(4), 493-510.
- Gumson, W.A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. En A. Morris y C. Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in social movements. New Haven: Yale Universíty Press.
- Hewstone, M., Jaspars, J. y Lalljee, M. (1982). Social Representation, social attribution and social identity: The intergroup images of «public>> and «comprehensive» schoolboys. European Journal of Social Psychology,12, 241-269.
- Klandermans, B., de Weerd, M., Sabucedo, J.M. y Costa, M. (1999). Injusticial and adversarial frames in a supranational political context: Farmer's protest in the Netherlans and Spain. En D. della Porta, H. Kriesi, y D. Rucht (eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world. Londres: MacMillan Press.
- Llera, F. J. (1994). Los vascos y la política. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
- Mack, J. (1990). The psychodynamics of victimisation among groups in conflicts. En V.D. Volkan; O.A. Julios y V.V. Montville (eds.), The psychodynamics of international relationship. Vol. I: Concepts and theories. Lexington: Lexington Books.
- Reinares, F. (1998). Terrorismo y Antiterrorismo. Barcelona: Paidós.
- Sabucedo, J.M.(2000). Conflicto y violencia política. Conferencia impartida en el I Congreso Hispano-Portugués de Psicología. Santiago de Compostela, 21·23 de septiembre.
- Sabucedo, J.M., Klandermans, B., Rodríguez, M. y Femández, C. (2000). Identidad social, valoración política y movilización colectiva en un contexto supranacional. Revista de Psicología Social, 15(3), 269-279.
- Sande, G., Goethals, G., Ferrari, L. y Worth, L. (1989). Value-guided attributions: maintaining the moral self-image and the diabolical enemyimage. Journal of Social lssues, 45(2), 91-118.
- Shabad, G. y Llera, F.J. (1995). Political Violence in a Democratic State: Basque Terrorism in Spain. En M. Crenshaw (ed.), Terrorism in Context.Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Snow, D.; Hunt, S y Benford, R.(1992). Marcos de acción colectiva y campos de identidad. En E. Laraña, y J. Gusfield (eds.), Los nuevos movimientos sociales: de la ideología a la identidad. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
- Taylor, D.M.y Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a south Indian context. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171.
- Wieviorka, M. (1997). ETA and Basque political violence. En D.E. Apter (ed.), The legitimization of violence. New York: New York University Press