¿Producen resultado adverso de género las entrevistas estructuradas de selección de personal?

Bibliographic References

• Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., Y Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive metaanalysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291-304.
• Aramburu-Zabala Higuera, L. (2001). Adverse impact in personnel selection: The legal framework and test bias. European Psychologist, 6, 103-111.
• Arvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 736-765.
• *Arvey, R. D., Miller, H. E., Gould, R., Y Burch, P. (1987). Interview validity for selecting sales clerks. Personnel Psychology, 40, 1-12.
• *Berges, A. (2010). Validación de procedimientos de selección de personal en la policía local. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Zaragoza.
• Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., Y Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655-702.
• Cohen, J., Y Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Conway, J. M., Jako, R. A., Y Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 565-579.
• Feild, H. S., Y Gatewood, R. D. (1989). Development of a selection interview: Ajob context method. En. R. W. Eder y G. R. Ferris (eds.). The employment interview: Theory, research and practice. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
• Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of a personnel interview. Personnel Psychology, 19, 389-394.
• Z.ast;Goldberg, C., Y Cohen, D. J. (2004). Walking the walk and talking the talk: Gender differences in the impact of interviewing skills on applicant assessment. Group & Organization Management, 29, 369-384. (Pubitemid 38707147)
• Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., Y Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
• Huffcutt, A. I., Y Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
• Huffcutt, A.I., Conway, J.M., Roth, P.L., Y Stone, N.J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897-913. (Pubitemid 33582416)
• Huffcutt, A. I., Y Roth, P. L. (1998). Racial group differences in employment interview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 179-189
• Hunter, J. E., Y Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
• Hunter, J. E., Y Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of metaanalysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577-580.
• Z.ast;Kluemper, D. H. (2006). An examination of ability-based emotional intelligence in the structured employment interview. Tesis Doctoral. Oklahoma State University.
• Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., Y Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-427.
• Ley Orgánica 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, para La Igualdad Efectiva de Mujeres y Hombres.
• Little, J. P., Shonenfelt, E. L., Y Brown, R. D. (2000). The situational versus the patterned-behavioural-descriptive interview for predicting customer-service performance.Paper presentado en The 15th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Oranizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA, 14 de Abril.
• Mayfield, E. C. (1964). The selection interview: A re-evaluation of published research. Personnel Psychology, 17, 239-260.
• Z.ast;McCarthy, J. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Y Campion, M. A. (2010). Are highly structured job interviews resistant to demographic similarity effects? Personnel Psychology, 63, 325-359.
• McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., Y Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616.
• Moscoso, S. (2000). Selection interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 237-247. (Pubitemid 33203819)
• Moscoso, S., Y Salgado, J. F. (2001). Psychometric properties of a structured behavioral interview to hire private security personnel. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 51-59. (Pubitemid 33637685)
• Z.ast;Pintigore, R., Dugoni, B. L., Tindale, R. S., Y Spring, B. (1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 909-917.
• Prewett-Livingston, A. J., Y Field, H. S. (1999). The employment interview and race: A review. En A. Memon and R. Bull (eds.). Handbook of the Psychology of Interviewing. Chichester: Jonh Wiley and Sons Ltd.
• Z.ast;Pulakos, E. D., Y Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and Situational Interview Questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289-308.
• Z.ast;Sacco, J. M., Scheu, C. R., Ryan, A. M., Y Schmitt, N. (2003). An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 852-865. (Pubitemid 37239701)
• Saez, J. (2007). Diseño y validación de una entrevista conductual estructurada para la selección de agentes de policía local. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 23, 57-74.
• Z.ast;Saez, J. (2011). Determinantes del desempeño individual en agentes de policía local. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
• Salgado, J. F. (1999). Personnel selection methods. En C.L. Cooper y I.T. Robertson (Eds.). International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1-53). London: John Wiley y Sons.
• Z.ast;Salgado, J. F., Gorriti, M., Y Moscoso, S. (2007). La entrevista conductual estructurada y el desempeño laboral en la administración pública española: Propiedades psicométricas y reacciones de justicia. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 23, 39-55.
• Salgado, J. F., Y Moscoso, S. (1995). Validez de las entrevistas conductuales estructuradas. Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 11, 9-24.
• Salgado, J. F y Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive metaanalysis of the construct validity of the employment interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 299-324.
• Salgado, J. F., Y Moscoso, S. (2005). La entrevista conductual estructurada de selección de personal: Teoría, práctica y rentabilidad. 2a edición. Madrid: Pirámide.
• Salgado, J. F., Y Moscoso, S. (2006). Utiliser les entretiens comportementaux structurés pour la sélection du personnel? En C. Lévy-Leboyer, C. Louche y J.P. Rolland (Eds.). RH: Les apports de la psychologie du travail. Vol 1 (pp 195-207). Paris: Éditions d'Organisation.
• Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., Y Gorriti, M. (2004). Investigaciones sobre la entrevista conductual estructurada (ECE) en la selección de personal en la administración general del País Vasco: Meta-análisis de la fiabilidad. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 20, 107-139.
• Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., Y Ones, D. S. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection: an overview of construct, methods and technichs. En N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil y C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizacional Psychology. Vol 1 (pp 165-199). Londres: Sage.
• Schmidt, F. L., Y Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
• Schmidt, F. L., Y Rader, M. (1999). Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type. Personnel Psychology, 52, 445-464.
• Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.
• Schmitt, N., Clause, C. S., Y Pulakos, E. D. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job-relevant constructs. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 115-139.
• Schüler, H., Y Funke, U. (1989). The interview as a multimodal procedure. En E.W. Eder y G. R. Ferris (eds.). The Employment interview: Theory, research and practice. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
• Z.ast;Sue-Chan, C., Y Latham, G. P. (2004). The situational interview as a predictor of academic and team performance: A study of the mediating effects of cognitive ability and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 312-320. (Pubitemid 40031613)
• Ulrich, L., Y Trumbo, D. (1965). The selection interview since 1949. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 100-116.
• Wagner, R. (1949). The employment interview: A critical review. Personnel Psychology, 2, 17-46.
• Wright, O. R. (1969). Summary of research on the selection interview since 1964. Personnel Psychology, 22, 391-413.