El antropocentrismo y el argumento de los vínculos emocionales

  1. Horta Álvarez, Óscar
Journal:
Dilemata

ISSN: 1989-7022

Year of publication: 2009

Issue Title: La consideración moral de los animales no humanos

Issue: 1

Pages: 1-13

Type: Article

More publications in: Dilemata

Abstract

Nonhuman animals are routinarily used as resources for us to use. An important argument in the literature on the issue claims that this is justified because we are not attached to them by the emotional ties that bind us to other human beings. This line of reasoning is examined here and found to be faulty as regards both its factual and its normative assumptions. This implies that the burden of proof rests on the side of those who want to defend the use of nonhuman animals. The paper concludes with the claim that until a sound defense of anthropocentrism is provided, we should assume that such use is not morally justified.

Bibliographic References

  • Becker, Lawrence C., (1983): “The Priority of Human Interests”, in Miller, Harlan B. & Williams, William H. (eds.), Ethics and Animals, Clifton, Humana Press, 225-42.
  • Benson, John, (1978): “Duty and the Beast”, Philosophy, 53, 529-49.
  • Bernstein, Mark H., (1998): On Moral Considerability: An Essay on Who Morally Matters, Oxford, OUP.
  • Callicott, John Baird, (1992): “Can a Theory of Moral Sentiments Support a Genuinely Normative Environmental Ethic?”, Inquiry, 35, 183-97.
  • Dombrowski, Daniel A., (1997): Babies and Beasts: The Argument from Marginal Cases, Chicago, University of Illinois.
  • Gray, Jeffrey A., (1980): “In Defense of Speciesism”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 22-23.
  • LaFollette, Hugh & Shanks, Niall (1996): “The Origin of Speciesism”, Philosophy, 71, 41-61.
  • Marcos, Alfredo, (2001): Ética Ambiental, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid.
  • Midgley, Mary, (1983): Animals and Why They Matter, Athens, University Georgia Press.
  • Mill, John Stuart, (1969: 1852): Whewell on Moral Philosophy, in Collected Works, vol. X, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 165-201.
  • Raz, Joseph, (1999): Practical Reason and Norms, Oxford, OUP.
  • Sen, Karabi, (1980): Dimensions of Causality and the Philosophy of Speciesism, Calcutta, Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.