Validez de la entrevista conductual estructurada

  1. Moscovici, Serge
  2. Salgado Velo, Jesús Fernando
Revista:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Ano de publicación: 1995

Volume: 11

Número: 31

Páxinas: 9-24

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Resumo

Personnel selection interviews were criticized for low reliability and validity. However, the interviews based on behavior descriptions appear to have an acceptable validity to predict job performance. To check that point we conduct several meta-analyses. The main objective of this article was to integrate the validity coefficients of structured behavioral interviews (SBI). The second objective was to test if the research design (concurrent vs. predictive) has some effect on the coefficients. The third goal was to estimate the BSI validity for several occupational groups. Results show that BSI is a reliable (inter-rater reliability =.75) and valid procedure (r=.28, N=21.21). Second, the coefficients from concurrent designs are similar or slightly higher than the coefficients from predictive designs. Third, SBI is a valid procedure for all occupational groups. Finally, the implications of these results are discussed and future areas for research are suggested.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arvey, R.D. y Campion, J.E. (1982a). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
  • Arvey, R.D., Miller, H.E., Gould, R., y Burch, P. (1987). Interview validity for selecting sales clerks. Personnel Psychology, 40,11-12.
  • Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. y Ferrieux, D. (199ia). Les methodes d' evaluation du personnel utilisées pour le recrutement en France. L' orientation scolaire et profesionnelle, 20, 71-88.
  • Campion, M.A., Pursell, E.D. y Brown, B.J* (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25-42.
  • Defier, J., y Kleimnann, M. (1993). Quality improvement of the selection interview: The situational approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychologist, 3, 186-187.
  • Gabris, G.T. y Rock, S.M. (1991). Situational interviews and job performance: the results in one public agency. Public Personnel Management, 20,469-483.
  • Glauger, B.B. Rosenthal, D.B., Thorton, G.C. III, y Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493511.
  • Green, P.C. y Horgan, D.D. (1982). Behavioral interviewing. Memphis, TN. Guion, R.M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York. McGraw-Hill.
  • Harris, M.M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42, 691-726.
  • Hunter, J.E., y Hunter, RY. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96,72-98.
  • Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
  • Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., y Jackson, G.B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA. Sage.
  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interview is versus unstructured interviews, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67,577380.
  • Janz, T. (1989). The patterned behavior description interview: The best prophet of the future is the past. En E.W. Eder y G.R. Ferris (Eds.). The employment interview: Theory, research and practice. Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
  • Latham, G.P., Saari, L.M., Pursell, E.D., y Campion, M.A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied of Psychology, 65, 442-431.
  • Lathman, G.P. (1989). The reliability, validity and racticality of the situational interview. En R. W. Eder y G.R. Ferris (Eds.). The emplgyment interview. Theory, research and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lent, R.H., Auerbach, H.A. & Lewin, L.S. (197la). Research design and validity assessment. Personnel Psychology, 24, 247-274.
  • Lent, R.H., Auerbach, H.A. & Lewin, L.S. (1971b). Predictors, criteria and significant results. Personnel Psychology, 24, 519-533.
  • Mayfield, E.C. (1964). The selection interview: A reevaluation of published research. Personnel Psychology, 17,239-260.
  • McDaniel, M.A., Whetzel, D.L., Sclunidt, F.L., y Maurer, S. (1994). The validity of employment interview: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-617.
  • Motowidlo, S.L, Carter, G.W., Dunnette, M.D., Tippins, N., Werner, S., Burnett, J.R. y Vaughan, J. (1992). Studies of structured behavioral interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77,571-588.
  • Prieto, J.M., Blasco, R.D. y Quintanilla, 1. (1991). Recrutement et selection du personnel en Espagne. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 47-62.
  • Quijano, S. Díaz de (1992). Sistemas efectivos de evaluación y rendimiento: resultados y desempeños. Barcelona. PPU.
  • Reilly, R.R., y Chao, G.T. (1982). Validity and fairness of sorne alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 35,1-62.
  • Robertson, I.T. y Markin, P.J. (1986). Management selection in Britain: A survey and critique.. Journal of occupational Psychology, 59,45-57.
  • Rodríguez, J., Nuria, M., Casanova, A. y R.J. (1990). La dirección de personal en España, 1989. Barcelona. Ediciones 2000.
  • Ruiz, M., Fernández,. F. y Franza, J. (1992). Planificación estratégica de recursos humanos. Vigo. Consorcio de Zona Franca.
  • Schmidt (1994). Meta-analysis pro-grams. Iowa. University of Iowa.
  • Schmidt, F.L., y Hunter, J.E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
  • Schmidt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.
  • Schmidt, N., Gooding, R.Z., Noe, R.A., y Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
  • Schneider, B., y Schmidt, N. (1986). Staffing organizations. Glenview, IL. Scott, Foresman.
  • Schuler, H. (1989). Construct validity of a multimodal employment interview. En Fallon, B.J., Pfister, H.P. y Brebner, J. (Eds.). Advances in índustrial and organizational psychology. New York. North Holland.
  • Schuler, H. y Funke, U. (1989). Tlie interview as a multimodal procedure. En E.W. Eder y G.R. Ferris (Eds.). The Employment interview. Theory, research and practice. Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
  • Shackleton, V. y Newell, S. (1991). Management selection: A comparative survey of methods used in top British and French companies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 23-36.
  • Smith, M.-y Abrahamsen; M. (1992). Patterns of selection in six countries. The Psychologists: Bulleting of the British Psychological Society, 5, 205-207.
  • Ulrich, L., y Trumbo, D. (1965). The selection interview since 1949. Psychological bulletin, 63,100-116.
  • Wagner, R. (1949). The employment interview: A critical review. Personnel Psychology, 2, 17-46.
  • Wiesner, W.H., y Cronshaw, S.F. (1988). The moderating impact of interview format and degree of structure on interview validity. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61,275-290.
  • Wright, O.R. (1. 969). Summary of research on the selection interview since 1964. Personnel Psychology, 22, 391-413.
  • Wright, P.M., Lochtenfels, P.A. y Pursell, E.D. (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 191-199.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet