Revisiting Modality : A corpus-based study of epistemic adverbs in Galician

  1. Míguez, Vítor 1
  1. 1 Instituto da Lingua Galega / Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

ISSN: 2213-3887

ISBN: 9789027214737,  9789027246981

Año de publicación: 2024

Tipo: Libro

DOI: 10.1075/IHLL.40 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85189039496 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abraham, W. (2020) Modality in syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139108676 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139108676 [Google Scholar]
  • Aguete Cajiao, A. (2020) Contacto de linguas e variedades na emerxencia de novos modelos de vocalismo galego. In F. Dubert-García , V. Míguez , & X. Sousa (Eds.), Variedades lingüísticas en contacto na Península Ibérica (pp.155–193). Consello da Cultura Galega. 10.17075/vlcpi.2020.006 https://doi.org/10.17075/vlcpi.2020.006 [Google Scholar]
  • Aijmer, K. (2016) Modality and mood in functional linguistic approaches. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.495–513). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.22 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.22 [Google Scholar]
  • Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • (2012) The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–485. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017 https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
  • (2016) Sentence types. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp. 141–165). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.8 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.8 [Google Scholar]
  • Albelda Marco, M. (2010) ¿Cómo se reconoce la atenuación? Una aproximación metodológica basada en el español peninsular hablado. In F. Orletti & L. Mariottini (Eds.), (Des)cortesía en español: espacios teóricos y metodológicos para su estudio (pp.47–70). Università degli Studi Roma Tre / EDICE. [Google Scholar]
  • (2016) Estableciendo límites entre la evidencialidad y la atenuación en español. In R. González Ruiz , D. Izquierdo Alegría , & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción (pp.75–100). Iberoamericana / Vervuert. 10.31819/9783954878710‑003 https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954878710-003 [Google Scholar]
  • (2018) La variación genérico-discursiva de la atenuación como resultado de la variación de la imagen. Spanish in Context, 15(2), 346–368. 10.1075/sic.00018.alb https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00018.alb [Google Scholar]
  • Albelda Marco, M. , & Cestero Mancera, A. M. (2011) De nuevo, sobre los procedimientos de atenuación lingüística. Español actual, 96, 9–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Albelda Marco, M. , & Estellés Arguedas, M. (2021a) De nuevo sobre la intensificación pragmática: revisión y propuesta. Estudios Románicos, 30, 15–37. 10.6018/ER.470321 https://doi.org/10.6018/ER.470321 [Google Scholar]
  • (2021b) Mitigation revisited. An operative and integrated definition of the pragmatic concept, its strategic values, and its linguistic expression. Journal of Pragmatics, 183, 71–86. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez, R. (2019) Galician linguistics: between Hispanic philological tradition and visibility in the Luso-Brazilian sphere. In G. Rei-Doval & F. Tejedo-Herrero (Eds.), Lusophone, Galician, and Hispanic linguistics: bridging frames and traditions (pp.92–112). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315403946‑6 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315403946-6 [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez, R. , Regueira, X. L. , & Monteagudo, H. (1986) Gramática galega. Galaxia. [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez, R. , & Xove, X. (2002) Gramática da lingua galega. Galaxia. [Google Scholar] Ameka, F. K. , & Kropp Dakubu, M. E. (Eds.) (2008) Aspect and modality in Kwa languages. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.100 https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.100 [Google Scholar]
  • Arppe, A. (2013) Polytomous: polytomous logistic regression for fixed and mixed effects [0.1.6]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/poly​tomous/ [Google Scholar]
  • Arregui, A. , Rivero, M. L. , & Salanova, A. (Eds.) (2017) Modality across syntactic categories. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] Ayoun, D. , Celle, A. , & Lansari, L. (Eds.) (2018) Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality: crosslinguistic perspectives. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.197 https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197 [Google Scholar]
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Bally, C. (1965) Linguistique générale et linguistique française (4th ed.). Francke Berne. (Original work published 1932) [Google Scholar] Beeching, K. , & Detges, U. (2014) Introduction. In K. Beeching & U. Detges (Eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change (pp.1–23). Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_002 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_002 [Google Scholar]
  • Bellert, I. (1977) On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 337–351. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177988 [Google Scholar]
  • Berbeira Gardón, J. L. (1998) Relevance and modality. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 11, 3–22. 10.14198/raei.1998.11.02 https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.1998.11.02 [Google Scholar]
  • Biber, D. , & Finegan, E. (1988) Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 1–34. 10.1080/01638538809544689 https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689 [Google Scholar]
  • Böhm, V. (2016) La imperfectividad en la prensa española y su relación con las categorías semánticas de modalidad y evidencialidad. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑06436‑0 https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06436-0 [Google Scholar] Bolkestein, A. M. (1980) Problems in the description of modal verbs: an investigation of Latin. Van Gorcum. [Google Scholar]
  • Boogaart, R. (2011) Imperfective aspect and epistemic modality. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality (pp.217–248). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.29.14boo https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.29.14boo [Google Scholar]
  • Boogaart, R. , & Fortuin, E. (2016) Modality and mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammars. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp. 514–534). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.23 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.23 [Google Scholar]
  • Boye, K. (2012) Epistemic meaning: a crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219036 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219036 [Google Scholar]
  • Brenes Peña, E. (2011) Descortesía verbal y tertulia televisiva. Análisis pragmalingüístico. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0159‑1 https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0159-1 [Google Scholar]
  • Brisard, F. (2006) Logic, subjectivity, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In A. Athanasiadou , C. Canakis , & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: various paths to subjectivity (pp.41–74). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110892970.41 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892970.41 [Google Scholar]
  • Briz Gómez, A. (1998) El español coloquial en la conversación: esbozo de pragmagramática. Ariel. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  • Butler, C. S. (2003) Structure and function: a guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part I: approaches to the simplex clause. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.63 https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.63 [Google Scholar]
  • Bybee, J. , Perkins, R. , & Pagliuca, W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Byloo, P. , Kastein, R. , & Nuyts, J. (2007) On certainly and zeker . In M. Hannay & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar: in honour of Lachlan Mackenzie (pp.35–57). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.83.04byl https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.83.04byl [Google Scholar]
  • Caffi, C. (2007) Mitigation. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Carballo Calero, R. (1966) Gramática elemental del gallego común. Galaxia. [Google Scholar]
  • Carnap, R. (1947) Meaning and necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Carretero, M. , & Zamorano-Mansilla, J. R. (2019) Disentangling epistemic modality, neighbouring categories and pragmatic uses: the case of English epistemic modal adverbs. InQuinze études de cas sur les modalités linguistiques / Fifteen case studies on types of linguistic modalities (pp.131–157). Publications Electroniques de l’ERIAC. eriac.univ-rouen.fr/disentangling-epistemic-modality-neighbouring-categories-and-pragmatic-uses-the-case-of-english-epistemic-modal-adverbs/ [Google Scholar]
  • Centro Ramón Piñeiro para a investigación en humanidades Centro Ramón Piñeiro para a investigación en humanidades (2022) Corpus de Referencia do Galego Actual [4.0]. corpus.cirp.gal/corga/ [Google Scholar]
  • Chafe, W. (1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology (pp.261–273). Ablex. [Google Scholar]
  • (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Chung, S. , & Timberlake, A. (1985) Tense, aspect, mood. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. III. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.202–258). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Cidrás, F. (2016) Why do they say ‘I know’ when they mean ‘I really don’t know’? Semantic change and constructionalization of Galician particle seica [Unpublished manuscript]. [Google Scholar]
  • Cidrás, F. , & Dubert-García, F. (2017) A gramática galega, un río de curso curto e sinuoso. Panorama histórico dos estudios gramaticais sobre o galego. Labor Histórico, 3(1), 111–125. 10.24206/lh.v3i1.17110 https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v3i1.17110 [Google Scholar]
  • Coates, J. (1983) The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Croom Helm. [Google Scholar]
  • Comrie, B. (1976) Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • (1985) Tense. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165815 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165815 [Google Scholar] Cornillie, B. (2008) On the grammaticalization and (inter)subjectivity of evidential (semi-)auxiliaries in Spanish. In E. Seoane & M. J. López-Couso (Eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization (pp.55–76). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.05cor https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.05cor [Google Scholar]
  • (2009) Evidentiality and epistemic modality: on the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16(1), 44–62. 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor [Google Scholar]
  • (2010) On conceptual semantics and discourse functions: the case of Spanish modal adverbs in informal conversation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 300–320. 10.1075/rcl.8.2.03cor https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.8.2.03cor [Google Scholar]
  • (2015) Más allá de la epistemicidad: las funciones discursivas de los adverbios epistémicos y evidenciales en el español conversacional. Spanish in Context, 12(1), 120–139. 10.1075/sic.12.1.07cor https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.12.1.07cor [Google Scholar]
  • (2016) Acerca de la locución epistémica tal vez en el Siglo de las Luces: innovación y especialización. In M. Guzmán & D. Sáez (Eds.), Márgenes y centros en el español del siglo XVIII (pp.183–199). Tirant Humanidades. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa Casas, X. X. , González Refoxo, M. d. A. , Morán Fraga, C. C. , & Rábade Castiñeira, X. C. (1988) Nova gramática para a aprendizaxe da língua. Vía Láctea. [Google Scholar]
  • Couper-Kuhlen, E. , & Thompson, S. A. (2000) Concessive patterns in conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause – condition – concession – contrast: cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 381–410). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219043.4.381 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.4.381 [Google Scholar]
  • Croissant, Y. (2020) Mlogit: multinomial logit models [1.1–1]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mlogit [Google Scholar]
  • Cruschina, S. , & Remberger, E.-M. (2008) Hearsay and reported speech: evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di grammatica generativa, 33, 95–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Dahl, Ö. (2000) The grammar of future time reference in European languages. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 309–328). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197099.2.309 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.2.309 [Google Scholar]
  • Davidse, K. , Van linden, A. , & Brems, L. (2022) A semiotic approach to grammaticalization: modelling representational and interpersonal modality expressed by verbonominal patterns. Language Sciences, 91, 101473. 10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101473 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101473 [Google Scholar]
  • De Wit, A. (2017) The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759539.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759539.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Declerck, R. (2009) ‘Not-yet-factual at time t’: a neglected modal concept. In R. Salkie , P. Busuttil , & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Modality in English: theory and description (pp.31–54). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213331.31 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213331.31 [Google Scholar]
  • (2011) The definition of modality. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality (pp.21–44). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.29.05dec https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.29.05dec [Google Scholar]
  • Degand, L. (2014) ‘So very fast then’ Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In K. Beeching & U. Detges (Eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change (pp.151–178). Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_008 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_008 [Google Scholar]
  • de Haan, F. (2001) The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics, 67(2), 193–219. 10.1086/466455 https://doi.org/10.1086/466455 [Google Scholar]
  • (2006) Typological approaches to modality. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The expression of modality (pp.27–69). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197570.27 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197570.27 [Google Scholar]
  • DeLancey, S. (2001) The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 369–382. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80001‑1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1 [Google Scholar]
  • Delbecque, N. (2009) Acerca de la relación entre cierto y seguro . In M. Veyrat Rigat & E. Serra Alegre (Eds.), La lingüística como reto epistemológico y como acción social. Estudios dedicados al Profesor Ángel López García con ocasión de su sexagésimo aniversario (pp.629–644, Vol. 2). Arco Libros. [Google Scholar]
  • Depraetere, I. , & Reed, S. (2011) Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics, 15(1), 1–29. 10.1017/S1360674310000262 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000262 [Google Scholar]
  • de Saussure, L. , Moeschler, J. , & Puskas, G. (Eds.) (2007) Tense, mood and aspect: theoretical and descriptive issues. Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401204446 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204446 [Google Scholar]
  • Deshors, S. C. , & Waltermire, M. (2019) The indicative vs. subjunctive alternation with expressions of possibility in Spanish: a multifactorial analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(1), 67–97. 10.1075/ijcl.17038.des https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17038.des [Google Scholar]
  • Diewald, G. (2002) A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp.103–120). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  • Dik, S. C. (1997) The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: the structure of the clause ( K. Hengeveld , Ed.; 2nd ed.). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218367 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218367 [Google Scholar]
  • Dixon, R. M. W. (2009) The semantics of clause linking in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), The semantics of clause linking: a cross-linguistic typology (pp.1–55). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199567225.003.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199567225.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Downing, A. (2001) “Surely you knew!”: surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions of Language, 8(2), 251–282. 10.1075/fol.8.2.05dow https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.8.2.05dow [Google Scholar]
  • Dowty, D. (1979) Word meaning and Montague grammar. Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  • Dryer, M. S. , & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.) (2013) The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/ [Google Scholar]
  • Du Bois, J. W. (2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp.139–182). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  • Eckardt, R. , & Beltrama, A. (2019) Evidentials and questions. In C. Pinon (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics12 (pp.121–155). CSSP. www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss12/ [Google Scholar]
  • Elliot, J. R. (2000) Realis and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology, 4(1), 55–90. 10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55 https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  • Espejo Muriel, M. d. M. , & Espinosa Elorza, R. M. (2012) Quiçab, quiçá, quizá. In E. Montero Cartelle & C. Manzano Rovira (Eds.), Actas del VIII Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española: Santiago de Compostela, 14–18 de septiembre de 2009 (pp.749–760, Vol.1). Meubook. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans, N. (2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: theoretical and empirical foundations (pp.366–431). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreiro, M. (1999) Gramática histórica galega. I. Fonética e morfosintaxe (4th ed.). Laiovento. [Google Scholar]
  • Figueras Bates, C. (2018) Atenuación, género discursivo e imagen. Spanish in Context, 15(2), 258–280. 10.1075/sic.00014.fig https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00014.fig [Google Scholar]
  • Foley, W. A. , & Van Valin, R. D. J. (1984) Functional syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Frawley, W. (1992) Linguistic semantics. Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  • Freixeiro Mato, X. R. (1998–2003) Gramática da lingua galega. A Nosa Terra. [Google Scholar]
  • (2005) Os marcadores discursivos. Conectores contraargumentativos no galego escrito. Universidade da Coruña. https://illa.udc.gal/rgf/monografias/ [Google Scholar]
  • (2006a) Gramática da lingua galega. II. Morfosintaxe (2nd ed.). A Nosa Terra. (Original work published 2000) [Google Scholar]
  • (2006b) Gramática da lingua galega. IV. Gramática do texto (2nd ed.). A Nosa Terra. (Original work published 2003) [Google Scholar]
  • García Murga, F. (2014) Semántica. Síntesis. [Google Scholar]
  • García Represas, D. (2000) L’expression du doute en galicien. In A. Englebert , M. Pierrard , L. Rosier , & D. Van Raemdonck (Eds.), Actes du XXIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes (Bruxelles, 23–29 juillet 1998) (pp.269–276, Vol.7). Max Niemeyer. [Google Scholar]
  • (2001) A necesidade e maila obriga en galego. Cadernos de Lingua, 23, 89–116. 10.32766/cdl.23.93 https://doi.org/10.32766/cdl.23.93 [Google Scholar]
  • Garson, J. (2018) Modal Logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/logic-modal/ [Google Scholar]
  • Gavins, J. (2005) (Re)thinking modality: a text-world perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 34(2), 79–93. 10.1515/jlse.2005.34.2.79 https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2005.34.2.79 [Google Scholar]
  • Gerards, D. P. , & Kabatek, J. (2018) Grammaticalization, distance, immediacy and discourse traditions: the case of Portuguese caso . In S. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond grammaticalization and discourse markers: new issues in the study of language change (pp.115–159). Brill. 10.1163/9789004375420_006 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420_006 [Google Scholar]
  • Giannakidou, A. , & Mari, A. (2018) A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality: the view from Greek and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36(1), 85–129. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9366‑z https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9366-z [Google Scholar]
  • Gisborne, N. (2007) Dynamic modality. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 4(2), 44–61. www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL09/ [Google Scholar]
  • Givón, T. (1982) Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language, 6(1), 23–45. 10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv [Google Scholar]
  • (1984) Syntax: a functional-typological introduction (Vol.1). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.17 https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17 [Google Scholar]
  • (1994) Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language, 18(2), 265–337. 10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv [Google Scholar]
  • (2001) Syntax: an introduction (2nd ed., Vol. 1). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.syns https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syns [Google Scholar]
  • González Vázquez, M. (2006) Las fuentes de la información: tipología, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad. Universidade de Vigo. [Google Scholar]
  • (2022) Unhas notas sobre o sistema evidencial galego. Estudos de Lingüística Galega, 14. 10.15304/elg.14.7767 https://doi.org/10.15304/elg.14.7767 [Google Scholar]
  • González-Vázquez, M. (2021) The evidentiality system in Galician and the seica marker. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 83–92. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  • Goossens, L. (1985) Modality and the modals: a problem for Functional Grammar. In A. M. Bolkestein , C. de Groot , & J. L. Mackenzie (Eds.), Predicates and terms in Functional Grammar (pp.203–217). Foris. 10.1515/9783110250527‑013 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110250527-013 [Google Scholar]
  • Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp.41–58). Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  • Gries, S. T. (2013) Statistics for linguistics with R: a practical introduction (2nd ed.). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110307474 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307474 [Google Scholar]
  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1970a) Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language, 6(3), 322–361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25000463 [Google Scholar]
  • (1970b) Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp.140–165). Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  • (2004) An introduction to Functional Grammar ( C. M. I. M. Matthiesen , Ed.; 3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold. 10.4324/9780203783771 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  • (2014) Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar ( C. M. I. M. Matthiesen , Ed.; 4th ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203431269 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269 [Google Scholar]
  • Harris, A. C. , & Campbell, L. (1995) Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  • Haßler, G. (Ed.) (2022) Manuel des modes et modalités. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110551099 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551099 [Google Scholar]
  • Hatav, G. (1997) The semantics of aspect and modality: evidence from English and Biblical Hebrew. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.34 https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.34 [Google Scholar]
  • Haverkate, H. (1994) La cortesía verbal. Estudio pragmalingüístico. Gredos. [Google Scholar]
  • Hengeveld, K. (1987) Clause structure and modality in Functional Grammar. In J. van der Auwera & L. Goossens (Eds.), Ins and outs of the predication (pp.53–66). Foris. 10.1515/9783110882278‑005 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882278-005 [Google Scholar]
  • (1988) Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics, 6, 227–269. 10.1093/jos/6.1.227 https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/6.1.227 [Google Scholar]
  • (1989) Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 25(1), 127–157. 10.1017/S0022226700012123 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012123 [Google Scholar]
  • (2004) Illocution, mood and modality. In G. Booij , C. Lehmann , & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation (pp.1190–1201, Vol.2). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110172782.2.14.1190 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110172782.2.14.1190 [Google Scholar]
  • Hennemann, A. (2014) The Spanish synthetic future as a means of expression of inference. Studies in Literature and Language, 9(1), 11–26. 10.3968/5215 https://doi.org/10.3968/5215 [Google Scholar]
  • Hickmann, M. , & Bassano, D. (2016) Modality and mood in first language acquisition. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.430–447). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.20 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.20 [Google Scholar]
  • Hilpert, M. , Cappelle, B. , & Depraetere, I. (Eds.) (2021) Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.32 https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.32 [Google Scholar]
  • Hirota, H. (2021) The indicative/subjunctive mood alternation with adverbs of doubt in Spanish. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1–15. 10.1080/09296174.2021.1919376 https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2021.1919376 [Google Scholar]
  • Hogeweg, L. , de Hoop, H. , & Malchukov, A. (Eds.) (2009) Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.148 https://doi.org/10.1075/la.148 [Google Scholar]
  • Hollebrandse, B. , van Hout, A. , & Vet, C. (Eds.) (2005) Crosslinguistic views on tense, aspect and modality. Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042029668 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029668 [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes, J. (1984) Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8(3), 345–365. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90028‑6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6 [Google Scholar]
  • Hopper, P. J. (1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp.17–35, Vol.1). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  • Hopper, P. J. , & Traugott, E. C. (2003) Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  • Hosmer, D. W. , Lemeshow, S. , & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013) Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley. 10.1002/9781118548387 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387 [Google Scholar]
  • Hoye, L. (1997) Adverbs and modality in English. Longman. 10.4324/9781315844015 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844015 [Google Scholar]
  • Hummel, M. (2013) La dimensión intercultural de la expansión diacrónica de los adverbios en -mente . In M. P. Garcés Gómez (Ed.), Los adverbios con función discursiva: procesos de formación y evolución (pp.15–41). Iberoamericana / Vervuert. 10.31819/9783954872015‑002 https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954872015-002 [Google Scholar]
  • (2018) Romance sentence adverbs in -mente: epistemic mitigation in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistik online, 92(5), 111–144. 10.13092/lo.92.4507 https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.92.4507 [Google Scholar]
  • Iwasaki, S. (1993) Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.2 https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.2 [Google Scholar]
  • Izquierdo Alegría, D. (2019) ¿Qué tipo de información codifica realmente un evidencial? Propuesta de una distinción conceptual entre fuente, base y modo de acceso para el reconocimiento de unidades evidenciales. Estudios filológicos, 63, 211–236. 10.4067/S0071‑17132019000100211 https://doi.org/10.4067/S0071-17132019000100211 [Google Scholar]
  • Izquierdo Alegría, D. , González Ruiz, R. , & Loureda Lamas, Ó. (2016) Un acercamiento a los fundamentos de la evidencialidad y a su recepción y tratamiento en la lingüística hispánica. In R. González Ruiz , D. Izquierdo Alegría , & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción (pp.9–45). Iberoamericana / Vervuert. 10.31819/9783954878710‑001 https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954878710-001 [Google Scholar]
  • Janda, L. A. (2015) Tense, aspect and mood. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Lingusitics (pp.616–634). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110292022‑031 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-031 [Google Scholar]
  • Jarrett, D. S. (2022) Epistemic adverbs of low speaker-commitment in Colombian Spanish[Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. https://iucat.iu.edu/iuk/19776021 [Google Scholar]
  • Jiménez Juliá, T. (1989) Modalidad, modo verbal y modus clausal en español. Verba, 16, 175–214. hdl.handle.net/10347/2738 [Google Scholar]
  • Kärkkäinen, E. (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus onI think. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.115 https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
  • Kearns, K. (2011) Semantics (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑35609‑2 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2 [Google Scholar]
  • Kehayov, P. (2017) The fate of mood and modality in language death: evidence from minor Finnic. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110524086 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110524086 [Google Scholar]
  • Kiefer, F. (1987) On defining modality. Folia Linguistica, 21(1), 67–94. 10.1515/flin.1987.21.1.67 https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1987.21.1.67 [Google Scholar]
  • Kotwica, D. (2020) Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 219–230. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  • Kratzer, A. (1977) What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 337–355. 10.1007/BF00353453 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353453 [Google Scholar]
  • (2002) The notional category of modality. In P. Portner & B. H. Partee (Eds.), Formal semantics: the essential readings (pp.289–323). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470758335.ch12(Original work published 1981) https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758335.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  • Krawczak, K. (2016) Objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity: integrating two Cognitive-Functional theories. Functions of Language, 23(2), 179–213. 10.1075/fol.23.2.02kra https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.2.02kra [Google Scholar]
  • Kuo, Y. H. (2022) Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese: a constructionalization account. Diachronica, 39(1), 88–127. 10.1075/dia.20047.kuo https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20047.kuo [Google Scholar]
  • Kuteva, T. (1998) On identifying an evasive gram: action narrowly averted. Studies in Language, 22(1), 113–160. 10.1075/sl.22.1.05kut https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.22.1.05kut [Google Scholar]
  • Labov, W. (1984) Intensity. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: linguistic applications (pp.43–70). Georgtown University Press. hdl.handle.net/10822/555477 [Google Scholar]
  • Lampert, G. , & Lampert, M. (2000) The conceptual structure(s) of modality: essences and ideologies. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  • Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • (1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 5–38. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  • (1991a) Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857733 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  • (1991b) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. II. Descriptive application. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804764469 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804764469 [Google Scholar]
  • (2000) Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800524 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  • (2008) Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Lassiter, D. (2017) Graded modality: qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198701347.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198701347.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Lazard, G. (1999) Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?Linguistic Typology, 3(1), 91–109. 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91 https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91 [Google Scholar]
  • Leech, G. (1970) Towards a semantic description of English. Inidiana University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • (1981) Semantics: the study of meaning (2nd ed.). Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  • Leiss, E. (2008) The silent and aspect-driven patterns of deonticity and epistemicity: a chapter in diachronic typology. In W. Abraham & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality-aspect interfaces: implications and typological solutions (pp.15–41). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.79.06lei https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.79.06lei [Google Scholar]
  • Levshina, N. (2015) How to do linguistics with R: data exploration and statistical analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195 https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  • Littell, P. , Matthewson, L. , & Peterson, T. (2010) On the semantics of conjectural questions. In T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence from evidentials (pp.89–104). University of British Columbia. www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WI5NjEzY/EvidenceFromEvidentials.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • López-Couso, M. J. (2010) Subjectification and intersubjectification. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics (pp.127–163). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214284.3.127 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.3.127 [Google Scholar]
  • López-Couso, M. J. , & Méndez-Naya, B. (2021) From complementizing to modifying status: on the grammaticalization of the complement-taking-predicate-clauses chances are and odds are . Language Sciences, 88, 101422. 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101422 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101422 [Google Scholar]
  • (2023) From chance to epistemic possibility: on the grammaticalization of happenstance expressions in English. In H. De Smet , P. Petré , & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Context, intent and variation in grammaticalization (pp.109–134). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110753059‑005 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110753059-005 [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzo, R. (1977) La traducción gallega de la Crónica General y de la Crónica de Castilla (Vol.2). Instituto de Estudios Orensanos Padre Feijóo. [Google Scholar]
  • Loureiro-Porto, L. (2014) Modal necessity and impersonality in English and Galician. In J. I. Marín-Arrese , M. Carretero , J. Arús Hita , & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: core, periphery and evidentiality (pp.171–200). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110286328.171 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110286328.171 [Google Scholar]
  • Lunn, P. V. (1995) The evaluative function of the Spanish subjunctive. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse (pp.429–449). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.18lun https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.18lun [Google Scholar]
  • Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics (Vol.2). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Malchukov, A. , & Xrakovskij, V. S. (2016) The linguistic interaction of mood with modality and other categories. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.196–220). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.7 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.7 [Google Scholar]
  • Martin, J. R. , & White, P. R. R. (2005) The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  • Matte Bon, F. (1995) Gramática Comunicativa del español. II. De la idea a la lengua (2nd ed.). Edelsa. [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews, R. (1991) Words and worlds: on the linguistic analysis of modality. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  • Mauri, C. , & Sansò, A. (2016) The linguistic marking of (ir)realis and subjunctive. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.166–195). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.9 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.9 [Google Scholar]
  • Menzel, C. (2016) Possible worlds. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University Press. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/possible-worlds/ [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer, D. , Zeileis, A. , & Hornik, K. (2022) vcd: visualizing categorical data [1.4–10]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vcd [Google Scholar]
  • Míguez, V. (2019) On (un)certainty: the semantic evolution of Galician seguramente . In C. Pinon (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics12 (pp.217–246). CSSP. www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss12/ [Google Scholar]
  • Míguez, V. (2021) The diachrony of Galician certamente and seguramente: a case of grammatical constructionalization. In M. Hilpert , B. Cappelle , & I. Depraetere (Eds.), Modality and diachronic construction grammar (pp.123–148). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.32.05mig https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.32.05mig [Google Scholar]
  • (2022) On epistemic modality and discourse strategy: evidence from Galician adverbs. Journal of Pragmatics, 201, 32–42. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  • (2023) A expresión da incerteza nos textos de CORTEGAL: un achegamento paradigmático. In M. Álvarez de la Granja & V. Míguez (Eds.), Perspectivas sobre a escrita académica en galego. Estudos baseados no corpus CORTEGAL de textos escritos por estudantes (pp.325–352). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.10.15304/9788419679970 https://doi.org/10.15304/9788419679970 [Google Scholar]
  • Montero Küpper, S. (1999) A categoría da modalidade en alemán e galego. In D. Kremer (Ed.), Actas do V Congreso Internacional de Estudios Galegos (pp.727–737, Vol.1). Centro de Documentación de Galicia da Universidade de Trier. [Google Scholar]
  • Mortelmans, T. (2007) Modality in Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford hanbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.869–889). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0033 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0033 [Google Scholar]
  • Narrog, H. (2005a) Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: a new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), 677–731. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.677 https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.677 [Google Scholar]
  • (2005b) On defining modality again. Language Sciences, 27(2), 165–192. 10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  • (2008) The aspect-modality link in the Japanese verbal complex and beyond. In W. Abraham & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality-aspect interfaces: implications and typological solutions (pp.279–307). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.79.19nar https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.79.19nar [Google Scholar]
  • (2009) Modality in Japanese: the layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.109 https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  • (2012) Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: a crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • (2016) Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In D. Olmen , H. Cuyckens , & L. Ghesquière (Eds.), Aspects of grammaticalization: (inter)subjectification and directionality (pp.19–46). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110492347‑002 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110492347-002 [Google Scholar]
  • Nauze, F. D. (2008) Modality in typological perspective. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation. https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/2068 [Google Scholar]
  • Nikolaeva, I. (2016) Analyses of the semantics of mood. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.68–85). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.3 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.3 [Google Scholar]
  • Nolan, B. (2008) Modality in RRG: towards a characterisation using Irish data. In R. D. J. Van Valin (Ed.), Investigations of the syntax–semantics–pragmatics interface (pp.147–159). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.105.13nol https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.13nol [Google Scholar]
  • Nuyts, J. (1992) Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language: on cognition, functionalism and grammar. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.20 https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.20 [Google Scholar]
  • Nuyts, J. (2001a) Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: a cognitive-pragmatic perspective. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5 https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  • (2001b) Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 383–400. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00009‑6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6 [Google Scholar]
  • (2005) The modal confusion: on terminology and the concepts behind it. In A. Klinge & H. Høeg Müller (Eds.), Modality: studies in form and function (pp.5–38). Equinox. [Google Scholar] (2006) Modality: overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The expression of modality (pp.1–26). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197570.1 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197570.1 [Google Scholar]
  • (2009) The “one-commitment-per-clause” principle and the cognitive status of qualificational categories. Linguistics, 47, 141–171. 10.1515/LING.2009.005 https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.005 [Google Scholar]
  • (2012) Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction, 5(1), 53–76. 10.1075/etc.5.1.04nuy https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.04nuy [Google Scholar]
  • (2014) Subjectivity in modality, and beyond. In A. Zuczkowski , R. Bongelli , I. Riccioni , & C. Canestrari (Eds.), Communicating certainty and uncertainty in medical, supportive and scientific contexts (pp. 13–30). John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.25.01nuy https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.01nuy [Google Scholar]
  • (2015) Subjectivity: between discourse and conceptualization. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 106–110. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.015 [Google Scholar]
  • (2016) Analyses of the modal meanings. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.31–49). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.1 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.1 [Google Scholar]
  • (2017) Evidentiality reconsidered. In J. I. Marín Arrese , G. Haßler , & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited: cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (pp.57–83). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.271.03nuy https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.03nuy [Google Scholar]
  • Nuyts, J. , & Byloo, P. (2015) Competing modals: beyond (inter)subjectification. Diachronica, 32(1), 34–68. 10.1075/dia.32.1.02nuy https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.1.02nuy [Google Scholar]
  • Nuyts, J. , Byloo, P. , & Diepeveen, J. (2010) On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: the case of Dutch mogen and moeten . Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 16–34. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  • Nuyts, J. , & van der Auwera, J. (Eds.) (2016) The Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Ochs, E. (1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.407–437). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Olbertz, H. , & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M. (2018) On objective and subjective epistemic modality again: evidence from Portuguese and Spanish modal auxiliaries. In E. Keizer & H. Olbertz (Eds.), Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar (pp.132–168). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.205.05olb https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.205.05olb [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira, T. (2015) Between evidentiality and epistemic modality: the case of the future and the conditional in European Portuguese. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 101–122. 10.1075/bjl.29.05oli https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.29.05oli [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer, F. R. (1979) Modality and the English modals. Longman. [Google Scholar]
  • (1986) Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • (1990) Modality and the English modals (2nd ed.). Longman. 10.4324/9781315846453 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846453 [Google Scholar]
  • (2001) Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  • Paolillo, J. C. (2002) Analyzing linguistic variation: statistical models and methods. CSLI. [Google Scholar]
  • Papafragou, A. (2000) Modality: issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Elsevier. 10.1163/9780585474199 https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585474199 [Google Scholar]
  • Patard, A. , & Brisard, F. (Eds.) (2011) Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.29 https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.29 [Google Scholar]
  • Pic, E. , & Furmaniak, G. (2012) A study of epistemic modality in academic and popularised discourse: the case of possibility adverbs perhaps, maybe and possibly . Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 18, 13–44. https://ojsspdc.ulpgc.es/ojs/index.php/LFE/article/view/35 [Google Scholar]
  • Pietrandrea, P. (2005) Epistemic modality: functional properties and the Italian system. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.74 https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.74 [Google Scholar]
  • (2008)  Certamente and sicuramente: encoding dynamic and discursive aspects of commitment in Italian. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 221–246. 10.1075/bjl.22.11pie https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.11pie [Google Scholar]
  • Pinto de Lima, J. (2008) Ongoing lexicalization and grammaticalization: a case from European Portuguese. In M. C. Almeida , B. Sieberg , & A. M. Bernardo (Eds.), Questions on language change (pp.49–67). Colibri. [Google Scholar]
  • Portner, P. (2009) Modality. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • (2018) Mood. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199547524.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199547524.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Przyjemski, K. (2017) Strong epistemic possibility and evidentiality. Topoi, 36(1), 183–195. 10.1007/s11245‑015‑9352‑1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9352-1 [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing [4.2.1]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org [Google Scholar]
  • Regueira, X. L. (2022) Language as object of research versus language as political object: old and new horizons in the study of Galician. In O. Castro , D. Baena , M. A. R. López , & M. Sánchez Moreiras (Eds.), Gender, displacement, and cultural networks of Galicia: 1800s to present (pp.27–61). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑98861‑6_2 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98861-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  • Rivas, J. , & Sánchez-Ayala, I. (2012) Procesos de gramaticalización en el desarrollo de las aportaciones reactivas: el caso de efectivamente . In E. Montero Cartelle & C. Manzano Rovira (Eds.), Actas del VIII Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española (pp.2363–2374, Vol.2). Meubook. [Google Scholar]
  • Robins, R. H. (2000) Breve historia de la lingüística ( M. Condor , Trans.). Cátedra. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodríguez Rosique, S. (2017) The future of necessity in Spanish: modality, evidentiality and deictic projection at the crossroads. In J. I. Marín-Arrese , J. Lavid-López , M. Carretero , E. Domínguez Romero , M. V. Martín de la Rosa , & M. Pérez Blanco (Eds.), Evidentiality and modality in European languages: discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodríguez-Espiñeira, M. J. (2010) Modalidad, gramática y discurso: posible, probable y sus antónimos. In M. J. Rodríguez-Espiñeira (Ed.), Adjetivos en discurso. Emociones, certezas, posibilidades y evidencias (pp.181–253). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. [Google Scholar]
  • (2019) La expresión epistémica si cuadra en español de Galicia. Estudos de Lingüística Galega, 11, 197–231. 10.15304/elg.11.5343 https://doi.org/10.15304/elg.11.5343 [Google Scholar]
  • Rojo, G. (1974) Perífrasis verbales en el gallego actual. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosales Sequeiros, X. (2000) Uso interpretativo de la lengua: disque y seica en lengua gallega. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Coord.), Panorama actual de la lingüística aplicada (pp.375–386, Vol.1). Universidad de La Rioja. [Google Scholar]
  • Saco Arce, J. A. (1868) Gramática gallega. Imprenta de Soto Freire. [Google Scholar]
  • Sadock, J. M. (1971) Queclaratives. Chicago Linguistic Society, 7, 223–231. [Google Scholar]
  • San Roque, L. , Floyd, S. , & Norcliffe, E. (2017) Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua, 186, 120–143. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  • Santamarina, A. , González Seoane, E. , & Álvarez de la Granja, M. (2018) Tesouro Informatizado da Lingua Galega [4.1]. Instituto da Lingua Galega. ilg.usc.gal/TILG/ [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider, S. (2017) Las dimensiones de la intensificación y de la atenuación. In M. Albelda Marco & W. Mihatsch (Eds.), Atenuación e intensificación en géneros discursivos (pp.23–42). Iberoamericana / Vervuert. 10.31819/9783954876334‑002 https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954876334-002 [Google Scholar]
  • Schoonjans, S. (2019) Modal particle meanings: new insights from gesture research. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 303–330. 10.1075/rcl.00037.sch https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00037.sch [Google Scholar]
  • Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2000) The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 41–63. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2000.tb00139.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00139.x [Google Scholar]
  • Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. , & Aijmer, K. (2007) The semantic field of modal certainty: a corpus-based study of English adverbs. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198928 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198928 [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa, X. (2012) Estrategias evidenciales y expresión de la fuente de información en gallego: los marcadores gramaticalizados. In X. Viejo Fernández (Ed.), Estudios sobre variación sintáctica peninsular (pp.75–98). Trabe. [Google Scholar]
  • Sperber, D. , & Wilson, D. (1995) Relevance: communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Squartini, M. (2001) The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language, 25(2), 297–334. 10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ [Google Scholar]
  • (2004) Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in Romance. Lingua, 114(7), 873–895. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00064‑0 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00064-0 [Google Scholar]
  • (2008) Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics, 46(5), 917–947. 10.1515/LING.2008.030 https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.030 [Google Scholar]
  • (2016) Interaction between modality and other semantic categories. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.50–67). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.2 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.2 [Google Scholar]
  • Stein, D. , & Wright, S. (1995) Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469 [Google Scholar]
  • Stubbs, M. (1986) A matter of prolonged field work: notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1–25. 10.1093/applin/7.1.1 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  • Suárez Hernández, A. (2018) Análisis diacrónico de adverbios con función discursiva: hacia una descripción lexicográfica. Cilengua. https://www.cilengua.es/tienda/historia-de-la-lengua [Google Scholar]
  • Sučić, L. (2019) El caso de acaso: una partícula modal. Verba, 46, 279–312. 10.15304/verba.46.4993 https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.46.4993 [Google Scholar]
  • Suzuki, D. (2018) The semantics and pragmatics of modal adverbs: grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of perhaps . Lingua, 205, 40–53. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.12.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.12.014 [Google Scholar]
  • Sweetser, E. (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  • Talmy, L. (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49–100. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  • (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. I. Concept structuring systems. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Thieroff, R. (2010) Moods, moods, moods. In B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (Eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe (pp.1–29). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.120.01thi https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.01thi [Google Scholar]
  • Traugott, E. C. (1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65(1), 31–55. 10.2307/414841 https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  • Traugott, E. C. (2003a) Approaching modality from the perspective of Relevance Theory. Language Sciences, 25(6), 657–669. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(03)00017‑2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00017-2 [Google Scholar]
  • (2003b) From subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp.124–139). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
  • (2006) Historical aspects of modality. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The expression of modality (pp.107–139). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197570.107 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197570.107 [Google Scholar]
  • (2007) (Inter)subjectification and unidirectionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 8(2), 295–309. 10.1075/jhp.8.2.07clo https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.8.2.07clo [Google Scholar]
  • (2010) (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment. In K. Davidse , L. Vandelanotte , & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp.29–71). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  • Traugott, E. C. , & Dasher, R. B. (2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486500 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486500 [Google Scholar]
  • Traugott, E. C. , & Trousdale, G. (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Tucker, G. H. (2001) Possibly alternative modality. Functions of Language, 8(2), 183–215. 10.1075/fol.8.2.03tuc https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.8.2.03tuc [Google Scholar]
  • van der Auwera, J. , & Ammann, A. (2013a) Epistemic possibility. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/75 [Google Scholar]
  • (2013b) Overlap between situational and epistemic modal marking. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/76 [Google Scholar]
  • (2013c) Situational possibility. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/74 [Google Scholar]
  • van der Auwera, J. , & Plungian, V. A. (1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2(1), 79–124. 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  • van der Auwera, J. , & Zamorano Aguilar, A. (2016) The history of modality and mood. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.9–29). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.4 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.4 [Google Scholar]
  • Van linden, A. (2012) Modal adjectives: English deontic and evaluative constructions in synchrony and diachrony. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110252941 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252941 [Google Scholar]
  • Van linden, A. , & Verstraete, J.-C. (2011) Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: a conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 150–163. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.031 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.031 [Google Scholar]
  • Van Olmen, D. , & van der Auwera, J. (2016) Modality and mood in Standard Average European. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp.362–384). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.11 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.11 [Google Scholar]
  • Van Valin, R. D. J. (2005) Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610578 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  • Van Valin, R. D. J. , & LaPolla, R. J. (1997) Syntax: structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  • Varela Barreiro, X. (Dir.) (2007) Tesouro Medieval Informatizado da Lingua Galega. Instituto da Lingua Galega. ilg.usc.es/tmilg [Google Scholar]
  • Veiga, A. (1991) Sobre a decadencia do subxuntivo en prótases condicionais en galego e español e a subxuntivación da forma cantara . In M. Brea & F. Fernández Rei (Eds.), Homenaxe ó Profesor Constantino García (pp.497–539, Vol.1). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. hdl.handle.net/10347/12474 [Google Scholar]
  • (1992) Sobre a reorganización das oposicións temporais en subxuntivo e subxuntivo irreal na diacronía do verbo hispánico. In R. Lorenzo (Ed.), Actas do XIX Congreso Internacional de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas. V. Gramática Histórica e Historia da Lingua (pp.435–466). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. [Google Scholar]
  • Verhagen, A. (1986) Linguistic theory and the function of word order in Dutch. Foris. 10.1515/9783110856163 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856163 [Google Scholar]
  • Verstraete, J.-C. (2001) Subjective and objective modality: interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(10), 1505–1528. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00029‑7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7 [Google Scholar]
  • Verstraete, J.-C. (2005) The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: the non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia. Linguistic Typology, 9(2), 223–268. 10.1515/lity.2005.9.2.223 https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.2.223 [Google Scholar]
  • von Fintel, K. , & Gillies, A. S. (2008) CIA Leaks. Philosophical Review, 117(1), 77–98. 10.1215/00318108‑2007‑025 https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-025 [Google Scholar]
  • von Wright, G. H. (1951) An essay in modal logic. North-Holland. [Google Scholar]
  • White, P. R. R. (2003) Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text & Talk, 23(2), 259–284. 10.1515/text.2003.011 https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.011 [Google Scholar]
  • Willett, T. (1988) A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51–97. 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969) On certainty ( G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright , Eds. ; D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe , Trans.). Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Woehr, R. (1972) “Acaso,” “quizá(s),” “tal vez”: free variants?Hispania, 55(2), 320–327. 10.2307/338322 https://doi.org/10.2307/338322 [Google Scholar]
  • Wright, S. (1995) Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation (pp.151–172). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.008 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.008 [Google Scholar]