Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI-30)propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación española

  1. Francisca Fariña 1
  2. Mercedes Novo 2
  3. Júlio Rique 3
  4. Rômulo Lustosa 3
  5. Robert D. Enright 4
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  3. 3 Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa
  4. 4 Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI
Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Acción psicológica

ISSN: 1578-908X

Ano de publicación: 2023

Título do exemplar: Investigación aplicada en psicología jurídica y forense

Volume: 20

Número: 2

Páxinas: 1-18

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Acción psicológica

Resumo

Literature has systematically estab-lished that forgiveness has therapeutic effects. As for this, measures of forgiveness are a scientific and practice need. A study was designed to validate in Spanish setting the gold standard for the measure of forgiveness, the Enright Forgiveness Inventory-30 (EFI-30). Method: The EFI-30 was translated to Spanish from the original English ver-sion (back translation). The EFI-30, a measure of for-giveness and a measure of social desirability were admin-istered to a Spanish sample of 623 participants (66.8% fe-male, 32.4% male, 0.8% did not report) with a mean age of 29 years (SD=14.65). Results: A confirmatory facto-rial analysis showed the best fit indexes (construct valid-ity) for the seminal 6-factor structure (positive affect, neg-ative affect, positive behavior, negative behavior, positive cognition, negative cognition) of the EFI-30 (factorial in-variance), a positive correlation with the measure of for-giveness (convergent validity), and a non-significant cor-relation with social desirability (discriminant validity). Likewise, through the mean variance extracted, conver-gent validity was also found for the factors and discrimi-nant validity between the factors. The reliability of the composite was α=.96. Conclusions: The results of the validation of the EFI-30 in Spanish are discussed, as well as the validity of its use in scientific studies (α> .80) and in applied settings (e.g., clinician) involving important de-cision making (α> .95).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2ª ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Crowne, D. P. y Marlowe, D. (1960). A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
  • Enright, R. D., and The Human Development Group. (1991). The Moral Development of Forgiveness. En W. M. Kurtines y J. L. Gewirtz (eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (Vol. 1., pp. 123–152). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Enright, R. D. y The Human Development Group. (1994). Piaget on the Moral Development of Forgiveness: Identity or reciprocity? Human Development, 37, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278239
  • Enright, R. D., Freedman, S. y Rique, J. (1998). The Psychology of Interpersonal Forgiveness. En R. D. Enright y J. North, J. (eds.), Exploring Forgiveness (pp. 46–62). University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Enright, R. D., Santos, M. J. D. y Al-Mabuk, R. (1989). The Adolescent as Forgiver. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1971(89)90092-4
  • Enright, R. D. y Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2015). Forgiveness Therapy: An Empirical Guide for Resolving Anger and Restoring Hope. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14526-000
  • Enright, R. D. y Rique, J. (2004). Manual for the Enright Forgiveness Inventory. Mind Garden.
  • Enright, R., Rique, J., Lustosa, R., Song, J. Y., Komoski, M. C., Batool, I., Bolt, D., Sung, H-J., Huang, T., Park, Y., Leer-Salvesen, P. E., Andrade, T., Naeem, A., Viray, J. y Costuna, E. (2022). Validating the Enright Forgiveness Inventory-30 (EFI-30): International Studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(2), 113–123 https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000649
  • Fariña, F., Arce, R., Tomé, D. y Seijo, D. (2020). Validación del Cuestionario Actitud ante el Conflicto Parental: Autoinformada y Referenciada (ACPar) [Validation of the Attitude to Parental Conflict Questionnaire: Self-reported and Referenced (ACPar)]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.01.031
  • Fariña, F. y Oyhamburu, M. S. (2021). Del sujeto a la persona: El estudio del perdón en perspectiva de TJ [From Subject to Person: The study of Forgiveness from a TJ Perspective]. Revista Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica, 2, 478.
  • Fariña, F., Oyhamburu, M. S. y Vázquez, M. J. (2021). El perdón un proceso relevante para la Justicia Terapéutica [Forgiveness, a Relevant Process for Therapeutic Justice]. Quaderni di Conziliiazioni, 14, 67–79.
  • Fernández-Capo, M., Fernández, S. R., Sanfeliu, M. G., Benito, J. G. y Worthington, E. L. (2017). Measuring Forgiveness. European Psychologist, 22(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000303
  • Fornell, C. y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Gao, F., Li, Y. y Bai, X. (2022). Forgiveness and Subjective Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis Review. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, Part B, 111350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111350
  • González, A., Marcos, V. y Novo, M. (2021). El estudio del perdón desde la Justicia Terapéutica: Revisión sistemática sobre los beneficios del perdón para el victimario [The Study of Forgiveness from Therapeutic Justice: A Systematic Review on the Benefits of Forgiveness for the Offender]. Revista Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica, 3, IJ-MDCCCLXXXII-562.
  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women Development. Harvard University.
  • Gómez-Leal, R., Megías-Robles, A., Sánchez-López, M. T. y Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2021). Psychopathic Traits and Ability Emotional Intelligence in Incarcerated Males. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a8
  • Gutiérrez, S., Sanz, J., Espinosa, R., Gesteira, C. y García-Vera, M. P. (2016). La Escala de Deseabilidad Social de Marlowe-Crowne: Baremos para la población general española y desarrollo de una versión breve [The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale: Norms for the Spanish General Population and Development of a Short Version]. Anales de Psicología, 32(1), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.185471
  • Kaleta, K. y Mróz, J. (2022). Gender Differences in Forgiveness and its Affective Correlates. Journal of Religion and Health, 61, 2819–2837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01369-5
  • Kim, J. J., Volk, F. y Enright, R. D. (2022). Validating the Enright Self-Forgiveness Inventory (ESFI). Current Psychology, 41, 7604–7617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01248-4
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on Moral Development: The Psychology of Moral Development (Vol. 2). Harper and Row.
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Data: Comparing Robust Maximum Likelihood and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares. Behavioral Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
  • Maganto, C. y Garaigordobil, M. (2010). Evaluación del perdón: Diferencias generacionales y diferencias de sexo [Assessment of Forgiving: Generational and Sex Differences]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 42(3), 391–403.
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P. y Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición [International Test Commission Guidelines for Test Translation and Adaptation: Second Edition]. Psicothema, 25(2), 15–157. https://www.cop.es/pdf/dtyatest.pdf
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Padrón, I., Góngora, D., Moreno, I., Rodrigo, M. J. y Martín, A. M. (2022). Contribution of Brain Cortical Features to the Psychological Risk Profile of Juvenile Offenders. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 14(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2022a9
  • Peterson, S. J., Van Tongeren, D. R., Womack, S. T., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E. y Griffin, B. J. (2017). The Benefits of Self-Forgiveness on Mental Health: Evidence from Correlational and Experimental Research. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1163407
  • Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The Moral Judgment of the Child. Norton.
  • Prieto-Ursúa, M. y Echegoyen, I. (2015). ¿Perdón a uno mismo, autoaceptación o restauración intrapersonal? Cuestiones abiertas en psicología del perdón [Self-forgiveness, Self-Acceptance, or Intrapersonal Restoration? Open Issues in the Psychology of Forgiveness]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 36(3), 230–237. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/2617.pdf
  • Redondo, L., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Novo, M. y Arce, R. (2019). A Meta-Analytical Review of the Responses in the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF Clinical and Restructured Scales of Parents in Child Custody Dispute. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 35(1) 156–165. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.35.1.338381
  • Rique, J., Camino, C., Formiga, N., Medeiros, F. y Luna, V. (2010). Consideração empática e tomada de perspectiva para o perdão interpessoal [Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking for Interpersonal Forgiveness]. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 44(3), 411-418.
  • Rique, J., de Abreu, E. L. y Klatt, J. (2020). Theories and Empirical Research on Forgiveness in South America and Latin Europe: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Spain, and Portugal. En E. L. Worthington y N. G Wade (Eds.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 242-252). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351123341-23
  • Rodríguez, L. M., Tortul, M. C., Menghi, M. S. y Moreno, J. E. (2018). El perdón en adolescentes y jóvenes: Una propuesta para su medición en Argentina [Forgiveness in Adolescents and Young People. A Proposal for its Measurement in Argentina]. Psicodebate, 18(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v18i1.702
  • Ruiz, J. I., y Herrera, A. N. (2022). Efectos de la victimización criminal en la percepción del mundo de una muestra de estudiantes colombianos de carreras superiores [Effects of Criminal Victimization on the Perception of the World in a Sample of Colombian Technical University Students]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 13(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2022.02.056
  • Shapland, J. (2016). Forgiveness and Restorative Justice: Is it Necessary? Is it Helpful? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5, 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwv038
  • Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M. y Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring Interpersonal Forgiveness in Late Adolescence and Middle Adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1995.1045
  • VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2007). APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet