Grado de aceptación de los sistemas de evaluación digitales adaptados al uso de recursos tecnológicos educativos basados en Realidad Aumentada

  1. Delgado-Rodríguez, Santiago 1
  2. Carrascal-Domínguez, Silvia 2
  3. García-Fandiño, Rebeca 3
  1. 1 Universidad Nebrija (España)
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)
  3. 3 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (España)
Show affiliations +
Journal:
RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 1695-288X

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 22

Issue: 2

Pages: 135-148

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17398/1695-288X.22.2.135 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDehesa editor

More publications in: RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa

Abstract

The use of immersive technologies, especially Augmented Reality (AR), is presently one of the main technological trends in the field of education. Some studies carried out in recent years in this field highlight that traditional evaluation systems continue to be used and raise the possibility of using adapted evaluation systems. This research, based on primary sources of information, seeks empirical evidence regarding the need to use digital evaluation systems adapted to technological resources in Science subjects and in stages of Compulsory Secondary Education. The methodology used is quantitative research based on the design and statistical analysis of the responses given by students to a questionnaire created ad hoc, administered to assess an AR educational resource used in class to explain a key concept in connection with the subject. The results obtained through the exploratory factorial analysis of the students’ answers reveal, as a latent construct, a high level of acceptance of the digital evaluation system used. The analysis of the data obtained in this study allows us to establish the hypothesis that a digital evaluation system adapted to the use of an immersive AR technological resource can generate a positive impact on the students' learning process.

Bibliographic References

  • Abad, F., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., y García, C. (2011). Medición en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Síntesis.
  • Aiken, L. (1980). Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or Questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
  • Akçayır, M., Akçayırb, G., Miraç, H., y Akif, M. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054
  • Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Alzahrani, A., y Sarsam, S. (2020). Challenges and Prospects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Utilization among Primary School Teachers: A Developing Country Perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(100876). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
  • Alkhattabi, M. (2017). Augmented Reality as E-learning Tool in Primary Schools’ Education: Barriers to Teachers’ Adoption. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i02.6158
  • Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., y Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.
  • Blázquez, F., Alonso, L., y Yuste, R. (2017). La evaluación en la era digital. Síntesis.
  • Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brooks, C., Grajek, G., Alexander, B., Bali. M., Bulger, S., Dark, S.,
  • Engelbert, N., Gannon, K., Gauthier, A., Gibson, D. Gibson, R., Lundin, B. Veletsianos, G., y Weber, N. (2020). 2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teaching and Learning Edition . Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu
  • Cabero, J., y Barroso, J. (2013). La utilización del Juicio de Experto para la evaluación de TIC: El Coeficiente de Competencia Experta. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 65(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202
  • Cabero, J., Barroso, J., y Gallego, Ó. (2018). La producción de objetos de aprendizaje en realidad aumentada por los estudiantes. Los estudiantes como prosumidores de información. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación(11), 15-16. Obtenido de https://tecnologia-ciencia-educacion.com/index.php/TCE/article/view/221
  • Cabero, J., Leiva, J., Moreno, N., Barroso, J., y López, E. (2016). Realidad Aumentada y educación. innovación en contextos formativos (1ª ed.). Octaedro.
  • Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Llorente-Cejudo , C., y Fernández, M. (2019). Educational Uses of Augmented Reality (AR): Experiences in Educational Science. Sustainability, 11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184990
  • Cai, S., Chiang, F.-K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., y Lee, J. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1181094
  • Carrascal, S., Delgado-Rodríguez, S., y Garcia-Fandiño, R. (2023). Design, Development and Validation of an Educational Methodology Using Immersive Augmented Reality for STEAM Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1250
  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Delgado, S. (2021). Diseño, desarrollo y validación de un modelo metodológico educativo basado en software inmersivo de Realidad Aumentada como recurso didáctico. Mejora en el aprendizaje de ciencias en Educación Secundaria (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, España. www.ucjc.edu
  • Fombona, J., y Pascual, M. (2017). La producción científica sobre Realidad Aumentada, un análisis de la situación educativa desde la perspectiva SCOPUS. EDMETIC, Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 6(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v6i1.5807
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., y Anderson, R. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning, EMEA.
  • Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., y So, H.-j. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Education Technology Research Development, 63(3), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9374-9
  • Herpich, F., Fernanda da Silva, P., y Rockenbach, L. (2021). Efecto de las interacciones de estudiantes de ciencias con laboratorios virtuales de realidad aumentada para el desarrollo de visualización espacial. Revista Latinoamericana De Tecnología Educativa - RELATEC, 20(2), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.20.2.29
  • Keller, J. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance. The ARCS Model Approach. Springer.
  • Kim, K., Hwang, J., Zo , H., y Hwansoo, L. (2014). Understanding users’ continuance intention toward smartphone augmented reality applications. Information Development, 32(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914535119
  • Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9-24.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., y Ferrando, P. J. (2013). Factor 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794
  • Nieto, E. (2016). El papel de las tecnologías en el desarrollo de los aprendizajes y en la mejora del rendimiento académico. En M. Rodríguez, E. Nieto, y R. Sumozas, Las tecnologías en educación. Hacia la calidad educativa ( pp. 17-33). Síntesis.
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J., y Mondelli, V. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teaching and Learning Edition. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Publications. https://library.educause.edu
  • Prendes, C. (2015). Realidad Aumentada en educación: Análisis de experiencias prácticas. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación(46), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2015.i46.12
  • Sáez, J. (2017). Investigación educativa. Fundamentos teóricos, procesos y elementos prácticos (1ª ed.). UNED.
  • Sáez-López, J., Román-González, M., y Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using "Scratch" in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
  • Tarng, W., Ou, K.-L., Lu, Y.-C., Shih, Y.-S., y Liou, H.-H. (2018). A Sun Path Observation System Based on Augment Reality and Mobile Learning. Mobile Information Systems , 2018, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5950732
Data source: Dialnet