Consumption of information and citizen’s perception of the sources consulted during the Covid-19 pandemicA study of the situation based on opinion polls

  1. Alberto Quian 1
  2. Carlos Elías 2
  3. Xosé Soengas Pérez 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ths8210

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: International political communication

Volumen: 32

Número: 4

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2023.JUL.13 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

El objetivo de esta investigación transversal es analizar el consumo de información sobre la Covid-19 en España y conocer cuál es la percepción ciudadana sobre el papel de periodistas, medios, comunidad científica y autoridades gubernamentales y sanitarias. La metodología consistió en la realización de una encuesta descriptiva a una muestra de 1.800 personas representativas de la población española, mayores de edad y residentes en las 17 comunidades autónomas, entre el 6 y el 22 de junio de 2022. La edad, la afinidad política, la actitud hacia las vacunas y el nivel educativo son variables determinantes. Los resultados demuestran que la ideología y la edad son los factores que más condicionan el uso de diferentes tipos de fuentes informativas. Las personas que se sitúan en el centro político consumen más medios tradicionales que los de izquierdas o los de derechas, que son los que menos los consultan para informarse. Y los de izquierdas recurren más a fuentes oficiales, como las autoridades sanitarias, al contrario que los que se sitúan en el centro o en la derecha. Los antivacunas prefieren las fuentes alternativas. En cambio, el uso de fuentes no difiere entre hombres y mujeres. En este caso, hay un comportamiento de consumo coincidente, lo que demuestra que el género no es una variable que influya de forma significativa en el consumo informativo, ni en la selección de fuentes, ni en la percepción del papel de la ciencia y del periodismo. En general, las principales fuentes de información consultadas durante la pandemia de la Covid-19 fueron los medios de comunicación tradicionales y las autoridades sanitarias. En el contexto de la pandemia, los jóvenes son los que consumieron menos información y los que expresaron mayor desconfianza en el periodismo y en la ciencia

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allum, Nick; Sturgis, Patrick; Tabourazi, Dimitra; Brunton-Smith, Ian (2008). “Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis”. Public understanding of science, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
  • Bernal-Triviño, Ana (2020). “Habits and feelings regarding Covid-19 news coverage during lockdown in Spain”. Tripodos, n. 49, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.49p169-183
  • Briones, Rowena; Nan, Xiaoli; Madden, Kelly; Waks, Leah (2012). “When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube”. Health communication, v. 27, n. 5, pp. 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258
  • Calisher, Charles; Carroll, Dennis; Colwell, Rita; Corley, Ronald B.; Daszak, Peter; Drosten, Christian; Enjuanes, Luis; Farrar, Jeremy; Field, Hume; Golding, Josie; Gorbalenya, Alexander; Haagmans, Bart; Hughes, James M.; Karesh, William B.; Keusch, Gerald T.; Lam, Sai-Kit; Lubroth, Juan; Mackenzie, John S.; Madoff, Larry; Mazet, Jonna; Palese, Peter; Perlman, Stanley; Poon, Leo; Roizman, Bernard; Saif, Linda; Subbarao, Kanta; Turner, Mike (2020). “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting Covid-19”. The lancet, v. 395, n. 10226, pp. e42-e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
  • Casero-Ripollés, Andreu; Doménech-Fabregat, Hugo; Alonso-Muñoz, Laura (2023). “Percepciones de la ciudadanía española ante la desinformación en tiempos de la Covid-19”. Icono 14, v. 21, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1988
  • Catalán-Matamoros, Daniel; Elías, Carlos (2020). “Vaccine hesitancy in the age of coronavirus and fake news: analysis of journalistic sources in the Spanish quality press”. International journal of environmental research and public health, v. 17, n. 21, 8136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218136
  • Costa-Sánchez, Carmen; López-García, Xosé (2020). “Comunicación y crisis del coronavirus en España. Primeras lecciones”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 3, e290304. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.04
  • Daraz, Lubna; Morrow; Allison S.; Ponce, Óscar-Josué; Beuschel, Bradley; Farah, Magdoleen H.; Katabi, Abdulrahman; Alsawas, Mouaz; Majzoub, Abdul M.; Benkhadra, Raed; Seisa Mohamed O.; Ding, Jingyi; Prokop, Larry; Murad, M. Hassan (2019). “Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the internet”. Journal of general internal medicine, n. 34, pp. 1884-1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0
  • Egelhofer, Jana-Laura (2023). “How politicians’ attacks on science communication influence public perceptions of journalists and scientists”. Media and communication, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 361-373. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6098
  • Elías, Carlos (2019). Science on the ropes: decline of scientific culture in the era of fake news. Cham (Suiza): Springer. ISBN: 978 3 030 12977 4
  • Elías, Carlos (2020). “Expertos/as científicos/as y comunicación gubernamental en la era de las fake news. Análisis de la estrategia informativa del Covid-19 en España”. Prisma social, n. 31, pp. 6-39. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/3945
  • Elías, Carlos; Catalán-Matamoros, Daniel (2020). “Coronavirus in Spain: fear of ‘official’ fake news boosts WhatsApp and alternative sources”. Media and communication, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 462-466. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3217
  • Eysenbach, Gunther (2002). “Infodemiology: The epidemiology of (mis)information”. The American journal of medicine, v. 113, n. 9, pp. 763-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01473-0
  • Eysenbach, Gunther (2020). “How to fight an infodemic: The four pillars of infodemic management”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 22, n. 6, e21820. https://doi.org/10.2196/21820
  • Francés-Lecumberri, Paz (2020). “Expresiones punitivas en la emergencia de la Covid-19”. En: Rivera Beiras, I. (coord.). Pandemia: derechos humanos, sistema penal y control social (en tiempos de coronavirus). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades, pp. 93-109. ISBN: 978 84 13554396
  • Fraser, Nicholas; Brierley, Liam; Dey, Gautam; Polka, Jessica-Kathleen; Pálfy, Máté; Nanni, Federico; Coates, Jonathon-Alexis (2021). “The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of Covid-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape”. PLoS biology, v. 19, n. 4, e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
  • Freeman, Daniel; Waite, Felicity; Rosebrock, Laina; Petit, Ariane; Causier, Chiara; East, Anna; Jenner, Lucy; Teale, Ashley-Louise; Carr, Lydia; Mulhall, Sophie; Bold, Emily; Lambe, Sinéad (2022). “Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England”. Psychological medicine, v. 52, n. 2, pp. 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
  • Gallotti, Riccardo; Valle, Francesco; Castaldo, Nicola; Sacco, Pierlugi; De-Domenico, Manlio (2020). “Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to Covid-19 epidemics”. Nature human behaviour, n. 4, pp. 1285-1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00994-6
  • Garrett, Laurie (2020). “Covid-19: the medium is the message”. The lancet, v. 395, n. 10228, pp. 942-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30600-0
  • Gauchat, Gordon (2012). “Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010”. American sociological review, v. 77, n. 2, pp. 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225
  • Hamilton, Lawrence C. (2015). “Conservative and liberal views of science: does trust depend on topic?”. The Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars’ Repository, 252. https://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/252
  • Hartman, Robert O.; Dieckmann, Nathan F.; Sprenger, Amber M.; Stastny, Bradley J.; DeMarree, Kenneth G. (2017). “Modeling attitudes toward science: development and validation of the credibility of science scale”. Basic and applied social psychology, v. 39, n. 6, pp. 358-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1372284
  • Hauer, Michael K.; Sood, Suruchi (2020). “Using social media to communicate sustainable preventive measures and curtail misinformation”. Frontiers in psychology, v. 11, 568324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568324
  • Introne, Joshua; Gokce-Yildirim, Irem; Iandoli, Luca; DeCook, Julia; Elzeini, Shaima (2018). “How people weave online information into pseudoknowledge”. Social media + society, v. 4, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785639
  • Islam, Saiful; Sarkar, Tonmoy; Khan, Sazzad-Hossain; Mostofa-Kamal, Abu-Hena; Murshid-Hasan, S. M.; Kabir, Alamgir; Yeasmin, Dalia; Islam, Mohammad-Ariful; Amin-Chowdhury, Kamal-Ibne; Anwar, Kazi-Selim; Chughtai, Abrar-Ahmad; Seale, Holly (2020). “Covid-19 related infodemic and its impact on public health: a global social media analysis”. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, v. 103, n. 4, pp. 1621-1629. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812
  • Jolley, Daniel; Lamberty, Pia (2020). “Coronavirus is a breeding ground for conspiracy theories - here’s why that’s a serious problem”. The Conversation, 28 February. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-is-a-breeding-ground-for-conspiracy-theories-heres-why-thats-a-serious-problem-132489
  • König, Lars; Breves, Priska (2021). “Providing health information via Twitter: professional background and message style influence source trustworthiness, message credibility and behavioral intentions”. Journal of science communication, v. 20, n. 4, A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20040204
  • Legido-Quigley, Helena; Mateos-García, José-Tomás; Regulez-Campos, Victoria; Gea-Sánchez, Montserrat; Muntaner, Carles; McKee, Martin (2020). “The resilience of the Spanish health system against the Covid-19 pandemic”. The lancet public health, v. 5, n. 5, e251-e252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30060-8
  • León, Bienvenido; Martínez-Costa, María-Pilar; Salaverría, Ramón; López-Goñi, Ignacio (2022). “Health and science-related disinformation on Covid-19: A content analysis of hoaxes identified by fact-checkers in Spain. PLoS one, v. 17, n. 4, e0265995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265995
  • Lewandowsky, Stephan; Gignac, Gilles E.; Oberauer, Klaus (2013a). “The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science”. PLoS one, v. 8, n. 10, e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
  • Lewandowsky, Stephan; Oberauer, Klaus (2016). “Motivated rejection of science”. Current directions in psychological science, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416654436
  • Lewandowsky, Stephan; Oberauer, Klaus; Gignac, Gilles E. (2013b). “NASA faked the moon landing - therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science”. Psychological science, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
  • Lobato, Emilio J. C.; Mendoza, Jorge; Sims, Valerie; Chin, Matthew (2014). “Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population”. Applied cognitive psychology, v. 28, n. 5, pp. 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
  • Lobato, Emilio J. C.; Zimmerman, Corinne (2019). “Examining how people reason about controversial scientific topics”. Thinking & reasoning, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1521870
  • Malhotra, Manoj K.; Grover, Varun (1998). “An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory”. Journal of operations management, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7
  • McMurray, Adela J.; Pace, R. Wayne; Scott, Don (2004). Research: A commonsense approach. Victoria, Australia: Thomson Social Science Press. ISBN: 978 0 170122351
  • Mian, Areeb; Khan, Shujhat (2020). “Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation”. BMC medicine, v. 18, n. 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3
  • Naeem, Salman-Bin; Bhatti, Rubina; Khan, Aqsa (2020). “An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk”. Health information & libraries journal, v. 38, n. 2, pp. 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12320
  • Nogrady, Bianca (2021). “‘I hope you die’: how the Covid pandemic unleashed attacks on scientists”. Nature, n. 598, pp. 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02741-x
  • O’Grady, Cathleen (2022). “In the line of fire”. Science, v. 375, n. 6587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq1538
  • Oppenheim, Abraham-Naftali (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Londres: Pinter Publishers. ISBN: 1 85567 043 7
  • Patel, Mohan P.; Kute, Vivek B.; Agarwal, Sanjay K. (2020). “‘Infodemic’ Covid-19: more pandemic than the virus”. Indian journal of nephrology, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 188-191. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470201/
  • Pennycook, Gordon; McPhetres, Jonathon; Zhang, Yunhao; Lu, Jackson G.; Rand, David G. (2020). “Fighting Covid-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention”. Psychological science, v. 31, n. 7, pp. 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
  • Posetti, Julie; Bontcheva, Kalina (2020a). Desinfodemia: descifrando la desinformación sobre el Covid-19. Unesco, Policy brief 1. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374416_spa
  • Posetti, Julie; Bontcheva, Kalina (2020b). Desinfodemia: disección de las respuestas a la desinformación sobre el Covid-19. Unesco, Policy brief 2. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374417_spa
  • Quian, Alberto (2023). “(Des)infodemia: lecciones de la crisis de la Covid-19”. Revista de ciencias de la comunicación e información, n. 28. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2023.28.e274
  • Rea, Louis M.; Parker, Richard A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978 1 118 76703 0
  • Roozenbeek, Jon; Schneider, Claudia R.; Dryhurst, Sarah; Kerr, John; Freeman, Alexandra L. J.; Recchia, Gabriel; Van-der-Bles, Anne-Marthe, Van-der-Linden, Sander (2020). “Susceptibility to misinformation about Covid-19 around the world”. Royal Society open science, v. 7, n. 10, 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
  • Rossi, Peter H.; Wright, James D.; Anderson, Andy B. (2013). Handbook of survey research. Academic Press: New York. ISBN: 978 1 483276304
  • Solomon, Daniel H.; Bucala, Richard; Kaplan, Mariana J.; Nigrovic, Peter A. (2020). “The ‘infodemic’ of Covid-19”. Arthritis & rheumatology, v. 72, n. 11, pp. 1806-1808. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41468
  • Tangcharoensathien, Viroj; Calleja, Neville; Nguyen, Tim; Purnat, Tina; D’Agostino, Marcelo; García-Saisó, Sebastián; Landry, Mark; Rashidia, Arash; Hamilton, Clayton; AbdAllah, Abdelhalim; Ghiga, Iona; Hill, Alexandra; Hougendobler, Daniel; Van-Andel, Judith; Nunn, Mark; Brooks, Ian; Sacco, Pier-Luigi; De-Domenico, Manlio; Mai, Philip; Gruzd, Anatoliy; Alaphilippe, Alexandre; Briand, Sylvie (2020). “Framework for managing the Covid-19 infodemic: methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 22, n. 6, e19659. https://doi.org/10.2196/19659
  • The lancet infectious diseases (2020). “The covid-19 infodemic”. The lancet infectious diseases, v. 20, n. 8, p. 875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X
  • Tomes, Nancy (2020). “Managing the modern infodemic”. Canadian Medical Association journal, v. 192, n. 43, pp. E1311-E1312. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.201905
  • United Nations (2020). “UN tackles ‘infodemic’ of misinformation and cybercrime in Covid-19 crisis”. The United Nations Department of Global Communications, 31 March. https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19
  • Van-der-Linden, Sander (2015). “The conspiracy-effect: exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance”. Personality and individual differences, v. 87, pp. 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
  • Zarocostas, John (2020). “How to fight an infodemic”. The lancet, v. 395, n. 10225, p. 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet