Influencia dos nesgos do comportamento nas decisións de investimentoa importancia da educación financeira en tempos de crises

  1. Tamara Armenteros Ruiz
  2. Leandro Benito 1
  3. María-Celia López-Penabad 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Zeitschrift:
Revista galega de economía: Publicación Interdisciplinar da Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais

ISSN: 1132-2799

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Ausgabe: 32

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 1-27

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista galega de economía: Publicación Interdisciplinar da Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais

Zusammenfassung

While classical financial theories assume the rationality of the individual, Behavioral Finance supports the influence of cognitive and emotional aspects on investment decisions. The objective of this study is to contribute in this field by analyzing the presence of five biases –Overconfidence, Herd Behavior, Player Fallacy, Hot Hand Fallacy, and Domestic Bias– and their relationship with the personal characteristics of the investor, in particular with his EFE. We also analyze the effect of the financial crisis derived from Covid-19 on the aforementioned biases. This work is based on 109 questionnaires carried out in Galicia to individual investors, both real and potential, operating in the stock markets. The results confirm the existence of such biases, their relationship with some personal characteristics, a lower presence in individuals with greater financial knowledge and the intensification of Overconfidence and Herd Behavior during prolonged crises.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Álvarez, L. F. (2016). Finanzas del comportamiento: una aproximación a los sesgos de comportamiento de los inversores [Trabajo de Fin de Grado, Universidad de León]. https://buleria.unileon.es/handle/10612/5526?show=full
  • Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31-35.
  • Attorresi, H. F.; Díaz, A. M. G. & Pralong, H. O. (2006). Identificación de la falacia del jugador en una situación típica de juego de azar. En Facultad de Psicología, XIII Jornadas de Investigación y Segundo Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del Mercosur. Universidad de Buenos Aires. https://www.aacademica.org/000-039/100
  • Banco Mundial (2018). PIB (US$ a precios actuales) Datos sobre las cuentas nacionales del Banco Mundial y archivos de datos sobre cuentas nacionales de la OCDE [Conjunto de datos]. EpData. https://n9.cl/g3pq
  • Bansal T. (2020). Behavioral Finance and COVID-19: Cognitive Errors that Determine the Financial Future. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595749
  • Barber, B. & Odean, T. (2013). The Behavior of Individual Investors. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 2(Part B), 1533-1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6
  • Barrios, C. M. D. S. (2018). Behavioral finance: principales sesgos y heurísticos, una revisión de la literatura [Trabajo de Fin de Grado, Universidad Pontificia Comillas]. https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/19002
  • Benoit, J.P.; Dubra, J. & Moore, D.A. (2015). Does the better-than-average effect show that people are overconfident? Two experiments. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13 (2), 293–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12116
  • Blasco, N. & Ferreruela, S. (2017). Behavioral Finance: ¿Por qué los inversores se comportan como lo hacen y no como deberían? BME, Estudios y Publicaciones. https://n9.cl/iz3p
  • Blasco, N.; Corredor, P. & Ferreruela, S. (2012). Market sentiment: A key factor of investors' imitative behavior. Accounting y Finance, 52(3), 663-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00412.x
  • De Bondt, W.F.M. & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact? Journal of Finance, 40 (3), 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
  • Bover, O., Hospido, L. & Villanueva, E. (2018). Encuesta de competencias financieras (ECF) 2016: Principales resultados. Banco de España. https://n9.cl/8i6zj
  • Chau, F.; Deesomsak, R. & Koutmos, D. (2016). Does investor sentiment really matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 48, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.10.003
  • Coval, J. D. & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999). Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045–2073. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00181
  • Damasio, A. (2010). Y el cerebro creó al hombre. ¿Cómo pudo el cerebro generar emociones, sentimientos, ideas y el yo? Ediciones Destino.
  • De Luis, A. (8 de enero de 2018). La falacia del jugador aplicada al trading. APA Style Blog https://blog.ibroker.es/la-falacia-del-jugador-aplicada-al-trading/
  • De Martino, B.; O'Doherty, J.; Ray, D.; Bossaerts, P. & Camerer, C. (2013). In the Mind of the Market: Theory of Mind Biases Value Computation during Financial Bubbles. Neuron, 79(6), 1222-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.003
  • Dijksterhuis, A.; Bos, M. W.; Nordgren, L. F. & Van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect. Science, 311(5763), 1005-1007. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121629
  • Duxbury, D.; Hudson, R.; Keasey, K. & Yang, Z. (2015) Do the disposition and house money effects coexist? A reconciliation of two behavioral biases using individual investor-level data. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 34, 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.11.004
  • Fama, E. F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock Market Prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34-105.
  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
  • Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient Capital Markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575- 1617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328565
  • Fama, E. F. (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00026-9
  • Fenzl, T. & Pelzmann, L. (2012). Psychological and Social Forces Behind Aggregate Financial Market Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2012.655383
  • Faulkner, A. (2022). Financial Literacy around the World: What We Can Learn from the National Strategies and Contexts of the Top Ten Most Financially Literate Nations. The Reference Librarian, 63(1-2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2021.2009955
  • French, K.R. & Poterba, J.M. (1991). Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 222-226.
  • Gaspar, I. (2021). La educación financiera es una inversión de futuro para la sociedad. (24 de junio de 2021). El Economista. https://n9.cl/2b6wj
  • González-Igual, M.; Santamaría, T. C. & Vieites, A. R. (2021). Impact of education, age and gender on investor’s sentiment: A survey of practitioners. Heliyon, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06495
  • Grossman, S. J. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American economic review, 70(3), 393-408.
  • Guo, X.; McAleer, M.; Wong, W.K. & Zhu, L. (2016). A Bayesian Approach to Excess Volatility, Short-term Underreaction and Long-term Overreaction during Financial Crises. (Discussion Papers 16-003/III). Tinbergen Institute. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/130493
  • Hirshleifer, D. (2001). Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533–1597.
  • Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity Breeds Investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.3.659
  • ING (2020). Comportamiento de los inversores españoles ante los movimientos del mercado. https://n9.cl/mjc14
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. The American Economic Review, 93 (5), pp. 1449-1475, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3132137
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  • Lütje T. & Menkhoff, L. (2007). What drives home bias? Evidence from fund managers’ views. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 12(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.309
  • Mahesh., K. M. (2016). Behavioural Finance: A Challenge to Market Efficiency. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, Volume, 6(10), 2977-2980.
  • Martínez-Morán, P. C. (2019). La irrupción de las finanzas conductuales. Icade, Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, (105). https://doi.org/10.14422/icade.i105.y2018.004
  • Merkle, C. & Weber, M. (2011). True overconfidence: The inability of rational information processing to account for apparent overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.004
  • Mitchell, O. S. (1988). Worker Knowledge of Pension Provisions. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1086/298173
  • Molina Marfil, J. A.; López Agudo, L. A. & Marcenaro Gutiérrez, O. D. (2021). ¿Es la educación financiera una asignatura pendiente en el sistema educativo español? Funcas. https://n9.cl/k80q0
  • Odean, T. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00072
  • OECD (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Volume IV): Are Students Smart about Money? Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/48ebd1ba-en
  • OECD/INFE (2020). OECD/INFE 2020 International Survey of Adult Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publising. https://n9.cl/72w0n
  • ODF-Funcas. (2021). ¿La mejor inversión para los jóvenes? Educación financiera. Funcas. https://n9.cl/bpg49
  • Orton, L. (2007). Financial literacy: Lessons from international experience. Canadian Policy Research Networks, Incorporated. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A34745
  • Pompian, M. M. (2017). Risk Tolerance and Behavioral Finance. Investment Management Consultants Association Inc. https://n9.cl/1c6ai
  • Pumares Iglesias, T.; Fernández López, S.; Vivel Búa, M.; & Rey Ares, L. (2015). La participación en el mercado de valores: ¿Por qué invierten los individuos? Revista Galega de Economía, 24(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.24.1.2681
  • Shefrin, H. & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. The Journal of finance, 40(3), 777-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x
  • Shiller, R.J.; Fischer, S. & Friedman, B. M. (1984). Stock Prices and Social Dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1984(2), 457-510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534436
  • Slovic, P. (1972). Psychological study of human judgment: implications for investment decision making. The Journal of Finance, 27(4), 779–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb01311.x
  • Stanovich, K. & West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
  • Stöckl, T.; Huber, J.; Kirchler, M. & Lindner, F. (2015). Hot hand and gambler’s fallacy in teams: Evidence from investment experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 117, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.07.004
  • Sunstein, C. R. & Thaler, R. H. (2008). Un pequeño empujón: El impulso que necesitas para tomar mejores decisiones sobre salud, dinero y felicidad. Taurus.
  • Tellería Ajuriaguerra, M.; Romeo Guillén, A. M. & Menghini, M. (2019). ¿Por qué educar en economía familiar y empresarial? PWC. https://n9.cl/gqmfq
  • Thaler, R. H. & Johson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643-660.
  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet