Construyendo modelos precursores sobre la flotabilidad de objetos macizos a los seis años

  1. García-Rodeja, Isabel 1
  2. Rodríguez Rouco, Estefanía Vera 1
  3. Lorenzo Flores, María 2
  4. Sesto Varela, Vanessa 3
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 CPI de Toural (Vilaboa)
  3. 3 IES A Pinguela (Monforte de Lemos)
Zugehörigkeit anzeigen +
Zeitschrift:
Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

ISSN: 0212-4521,  2174-6486

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Ausgabe: 41

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 137-154

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ENSCIENCIAS.5718 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

Zusammenfassung

This paper describes how four six-year-old children construct precursor models and explanations related to the buoyancy of objects during a teaching sequence on this conceptual domain. For data collection the intervention was recorded on audio. The results show that, at the beginning of the teaching sequence, some children are not able to justify their predictions about the buoyancy of some objects, while other use different criteria for each object such as size, hardness, or weight. However, by the end of the teaching sequence, children exhibit a precursor model about flotation in which they incorporate the idea that buoyancy depends on the material the objects are made of.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Butts, D. P., Hofman, H. y Anderson, M. (1993). Is hands-on experience enough? A study of young children’s view of sinking and floating objects. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03170644
  • Calo, M. N., García-Rodeja, I. y Sesto, V. (2021). Construyendo conceptos sobre electricidad en infantil mediante actividades de indagación. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 39(2), 0223-240. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3238
  • Canedo-Ibarra, S. P., Castelló-Escandell, J., García-Wehrle, P. y Morales-Blake, A. R. (2010). Precursor models construction at preschool education: An approach to improve scientific education in the classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 4(1), 41-76. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.134
  • Chan, C., Burtis, J. y Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
  • Costa, T. (2015). Influência da criação e crítica de analogias por estudantes de química do ensino médio na promoção de interações argumentativas [Tesis de doctorado]. Universidad Federal de Ouro Preto.
  • Cruz-Guzmán, M., García-Carmona, A. y Criado, A. M. (2017). Aprendiendo sobre los cambios de estado en educación infantil mediante secuencias de pregunta-predicción- comprobación experimental. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 35(3), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2336
  • Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
  • Eshach, H. (2003). Small-group interview-based discussions about diffused shadow. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 261-275.
  • Eshach, H. y Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315-336. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
  • Feu, M. T. (2009). Experimentar con materiales en el 0-6. Aula de Infantil, 52, 7-10.
  • French, L. (2004). Science as the centre of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.004
  • Gelman, R. y Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.009
  • Greca, I. M. y Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289976
  • Harlen, W. (1989). Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Ciencias. Morata.
  • Hsin, C. T. y Wu, H. K. (2011). Using scaffolding strategies to promote young children’s scientific understandings of floating and sinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9310-7
  • Inhelder, B. y Piaget, J. (1972). De la lógica del niño a la lógica del adolescente. Paidós.
  • Ioannides, C. y Kakana, M. (2001). Mental models of preschool children for the explanation of solid bodies floating and sinking in water [in Greek]. En K. Ravanis (Ed.), Introducing Young Children to Science: Educational and Instructional Dimensions (pp.127-134). University of Patras.
  • Kallery, M. (2015). Science in early years education: introducing floating and sinking as a property of matter. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.999646
  • Kohn, A. S. (1993). Preschoolers’ reasoning about density: Will it float? Child Development, 64, 1637-1650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04204.x
  • Koliopoulos, D., Tantaros, S., Papandreou, M. y Ravanis, K. (2004). Preschool children’s ideas about floating: a qualitative approach. Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 21-24.
  • Kuhn, D. y Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of cognition and development, 7(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0703_1
  • Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D. y Pliggie, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance. Modeling material kind. En M. Carver y D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 39 -74). Erlbaum.
  • Martínez, R. (2007). La investigación en la práctica educativa: Guía metodológica de investigación para el diagnóstico y evaluación en los centros docentes. Ministerio de Educación.
  • Metz, K. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219-290.
  • Palacios-Díaz, R. y Criado, A. (2016). Explicaciones acerca de fenómenos relacionados con el volumen de líquido desplazado por un sólido en inmersión, con la densidad y con la flotación, en alumnado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(2), 230-247. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=92044744001
  • Palaiologou, I., Male, T. y Needham, D. (2015). Doing research in education: Theory and practice. Sage.
  • Paños, E., Martínez, P. y Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R. (2022). La flotabilidad a examen en las aulas de infantil: evaluación del nivel de guía del docente. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 40(1), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3281
  • Piaget, J. (1934). La causalidad física en el niño. Espasa-Calpe.
  • Pramling, N. y Pramling-Samuelson, I. (2001). It is floating «cause there is a hole»: A young child’s experience of natural science. Early Υears, 21(2), 139-149.
  • Ravanis, K. (2000). La construction de la connaissance physique à l’age préscolaire: Recherchessur les interventions et les interactions didactiques. Aster, 31, 71-94.
  • Ravanis, K., Koliopoulos, D. y Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2004). What factors does friction depend on? A socio‐cognitive teaching intervention with young children. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 997-1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000138851
  • Selley, N. (1993). Why do things float? A study of the place for alternative models in school science. School Science Review, 74(269), 55-61.
  • Shayer, M. y Adey, P. (1984). La ciencia de enseñar ciencias: desarrollo cognoscitivo y exigencias del currículo. Narcea.
  • Smith, C., Carey, S. y Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21, 177-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
  • Stake, R. E. (1994). Case Studies. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  • Weil-Barais, A. (2022). What Is a Precursor Model? En J. M. Boileivin, A. Delserieys y K. Ravanis (Eds.), Precursor models for teaching and learning science during early childhood (pp. 11-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08158-3_2
  • White, R. T. y Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing Understanding. The Falmer Press.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods. Sage
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet