Obtención de la declaración en acoso escolar con orientaciones de Justicia Terapéutica

  1. Ramón Arce 1
  2. Álvaro Montes 1
  3. Mercedes Novo 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Revista Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica

ISSN: 2718-6822

Ano de publicación: 2022

Número: 4

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica

Resumo

School bullying has been highlighted in recent decades as a major and growing problem that directly threatens the health and well-being of children and adolescents. This has led national and international organizations to establish its eradication as a priority objective, as proposed by UNESCO (2019) and the Spanish Organic Law 8/2021, which includes school bullying and cyberbullying as an object of the law and indicates the need for educational administrations to regulate action protocols. Thus, it is needed to develop valid and reliable techniques to facilitate the judicial response in school bullying. In line with the Therapeutic Jurisprudence, these protocols should protect children and adolescents, minimize secondary victimization and promote their well-being during the judicial process. For this reason, we propose the following paper, which describes the procedure for obtaining the statement from victims of bullying during the judicial process, especially in the forensic evaluation. Based on the evidence, it is concluded that the most effective technique for this purpose is the Cognitive Interview (Fisher & Geiselman, 1992), which, applied with a Therapeutic Jurisprudence orientation, promotes the well-being of children and adolescents protects them from being victimized during the process. The paper concludes with the implications for victims and professionals in the judicial process.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ak, S., Özdemir, Y., y Kuzucu, Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: The mediating role of anger, don’t anger me! Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 437–443. https://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.chb .2015.03.03 0.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales (5ª ed.). Editorial Médica Panamericana.
  • Arce, R., Velasco, J., Novo, M., y Fariña, F. (2014). Elaboración y validación de una escala para la evaluación del acoso escolar. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 5(1), 71-104. https://dialn et.unirioja. es/servlet /articulo?c odigo=4 509525.
  • Arce, R., y Fariña, F. (2011). Evaluación forense del acoso moral en el trabajo (Mobbing) mediante el Sistema de Evaluación Global. En M. Matos, R. Abrunhosa, y C. Machado (Coords.), Manual de psicologia forense: Contextos, práticas e desafios (págs. 375-398). Psiquilibros Ediçoes.
  • Arce, R., y Fariña, F. (2012). La entrevista psicológico forense a niños, adultos y discapacitados. En S. Delgado, F. Bandrés, y A. Tejerina (Coords.), Tratado de medicina legal y ciencias forenses: Vol. V. Pediatría legal y forense. Violencia. Víctimas (págs. 795-817). Bosch.
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., y Quintero, I. (2013). Evaluación forense de la simulación en casos de acoso escolar. Aula Abierta, 41(2), 67-74. https://dialnet.unir ioja.es/ servlet/articulo ?codigo=4239 132.
  • Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., y Sorrentino, A. (2017). School bullying and cyberbullying among boys and girls: roles and overlap. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(9), 937-951. https://doi.org/10.1 0 80/ 109267 71.2017.133 0793.
  • Beckley, A. L., Caspi, A., Arseneault, L., Barnes, J. C., Fisher, H. L., Harrington, J. C., […] y Moffitt, T. E. (2018). The developmental nature of the victim-offender overlap. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4, 24-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-017-0068-3.
  • Bostic, J. Q., y Brunt, C. C. (2011). Cornered: an approach to school bullying and cyberbullying, and forensic implications. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 20(3), 447-465. https://d oi.org/ 10. 1016/j.chc .2011.03.004.
  • Ceci, S. J., Kulkofsky, S., Klemfuss, J. Z., Sweeney, C. D., y Bruck, M. (2007). Unwarranted assumptions about children's testimonial accuracy. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 311-328. https://doi.org/1 0.1146/annurev. clinpsy.3.022806. 091354.
  • Colwell, K., Hiscock. C. K., y Memon, A. (2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287-300. https://doi.or g/10.1002/ acp.788.
  • Corrás, T., Seijo, D., Fariña, F., Novo, M., Arce, R., y Cabanach, R. G. (2017). What and how much do children lose in academic settings owing to parental separation? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1545. http://doi.org/ 10.338 9/fpsyg.2 017.01545.
  • deLara, E. W. (2019). Consequences of childhood bullying on mental health and relationships for young adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2379-2389. https://doi.or g/10.1007/s10 826-019- 01515-4.
  • Díaz-Aguado, M. J., Martínez, R. y Martín, J. (2013). El acoso entre adolescentes en España. Prevalencia, papeles adoptados por todo el grupo y características a las que atribuyen la victimización. Revista de Educación, 362, 348-379. https://doi. org/10-4438/ 1988-592X-RE-20 11- 362-164.
  • Dodier, O., y Otgaar, H. (2019). The forensic and clinical relevance of evidence-based investigative interview methods in historical sexual abuse cases. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1244-1248. https://doi .org/10.1 177/216770261 9858287.
  • Fariña, F. y Arch, M. (2021). La Justicia terapéutica y el Derecho de Familia en España. En X. Abel (Coord.), Familias reconstituidas (págs. 19-31). Sepin.
  • Fariña, F. y Oyhamburu, M. S. (2021). Del sujeto a la persona: El estudio del perdón en perspectiva de TJ. Revista Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica, 2, 478. https://ar.ije ditores.com/po p.php?option= articulo&Hash= 980f6d6620afb1e 1a6b8b4311bd4 0495.
  • Fariña, F., Novo, M., y Arce, R. (2020). La entrevista cognitiva como una herramienta de justicia terapéutica. En B. Wexler, S. Oyhamburu, y F. Fariña (Coords.), Justicia terapéutica: un nuevo paradigma legal (págs. 59-80). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Arce, R., y Vázquez, M. J. (2017). Custodia compartida, corresponsabilidad parental y justicia terapéutica como nuevo paradigma. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 27(1), 107-113. https://d oi.org/1 0.1016/j.apj.2016. 11.001.
  • Fisher, R. P., y Geiselman, R. E. (2010). The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5-6), 321-328. https://doi.or g/10.101 6/j.ijlp.2010. 09.004.
  • Fisher, R., y Geiselman, R. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C. Thomas.
  • Galán, M. I. (2018). La responsabilidad civil derivada del delito de bullying o acoso escolar causando por un menor. https://ficp.es/w p-content/upload s/2018/08/Ga l%C3%A1n-Rodr %C3%AD guez.-Comu nicaci%C3%B3n.pdf.
  • Gini, G., Holt, M., Pozzoli, T., y Marino, C. (2020). Victimization and somatic problems: the role of class victimization levels. Journal of School Health, 90(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12844.
  • Gini, G., y Pozzoli, T. (2009). Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 123(3), 1059-1065. https://doi.org/ 10.1542/peds.2 008-1215.
  • Glew, G. M., Fan, M. Y., Katon, W., y Rivara, F. P. (2008). Bullying and school safety. The Journal of Pediatrics, 152(1), 123-128.
  • Gómez-Galán, J., Lázaro-Pérez, C., Martínez-López, J.Á. (2021). Trajectories of Victimization and Bullying at University: Prevention for a Healthy and Sustainable Educational Environment. Sustainability, 13, 3426. https://doi.org/10.3 390/su130 63426.
  • Idsoe, T., Dyregrov, A., y Idsoe, E. (2012). Bullying and PTSD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(6), 901-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9620-0.
  • Jimerson, S. R., Swearer, S. M., y Espelage, D. L. (2010). International scholarship advances science and practice addressing bullying in schools. En S. Jimerson, S. Swearer y D. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (págs. 1–6). Taylor y Francis.
  • Kretschmer, T., Veenstra, R., Branje, S., Reijneveld, S., Meeus, W., Dekovic, M., […], y Oldehinkel, A. (2018). How competent are adolescent bullying perpetrators and victims in mastering normative developmental tasks in early adulthood? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 41-56. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s1080 2-017-03 16-3.
  • Kwan, I., Dickson, K., Richardson, M., MacDowall, W., Burchett, H., Stansfield, C., [...] y Thomas, J. (2020). Cyberbullying and children and young people's mental health: a systematic map of systematic reviews. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(2), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.108 9/cyber.201 9.0370.
  • Ley Orgánica N° 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal (1995). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 281, 1-202. https://www.boe. es/buscar/pdf/ 1995/BOE-A-19 95-25444-con solidado.pdf.
  • Ley Orgánica N° 2/2006, de 4 de mayo, de Educación (2006). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 106, 122868-122953. https://www.boe.es/boe /dias/2020/12/3 0/pdfs/BO E-A-2020-172 64.pdf.
  • Ley Orgánica N° 5/2000, de 12 de enero, Reguladora de la Responsabilidad Penal de los Menores (2000). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 11, 1-41. https://www. boe.es/buscar/pd f/2000/B OE-A-2000-64 1-consolid ado.pdf.
  • Ley Orgánica N° 8/2021, 4 de junio, de Protección Integral a la Infancia y la Adolescencia frente a la Violencia (2021). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 134, 1-75. https://www.boe.es/bus car/pdf/2 021/BOE-A-202 1-9347-consolidado .pdf.
  • López, M. G., 2017. Acoso escolar y cibernético en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 15(1), 11-26.
  • Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., y Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340-372. https://doi.org/10. 1037/a00 20518.
  • Moore, S., Norman, R., Suetani, S., Thomas, H., Sly, P., y Scott, J. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60-76. https://doi. org/10.5498/wjp. v7.i1.60.
  • Mynard, H., Joseph, S., y Alexander, J. (2000). Peer-victimization and posttraumatic stress in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(5), 815-821. https://doi.org /10.1016/ S0191-8869(9 9)00234-2.
  • Novo, M., Fariña, F., F., Seijo, D., y Arce, R. (2013). Eficacia del MMPI-A en casos de acoso escolar: Simulación y diagnóstico. Psychosocial Intervention, 22, 33-40. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.5093/in 2013a5.
  • Novo, M., Fariña, F., y Vázquez, M. J. (2020). Justicia terapéutica en procesos penales con personas menores de edad como víctimas y testigos. En F. Fariña, M.S. Oyhamburu y D. Wexler (Eds.), Justicia terapéutica en Iberoamérica (págs. 189-208). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Novo, M., Seijo, D., Vilariño, V. y Vázquez, M. (2013). Frecuencia e intensidad en el acoso escolar: ¿qué es qué en la victimización? Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 4(2), 1-15. https://dialnet.u nirioja.es/servlet /articulo?codi go=4295883.
  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.
  • Olweus, D., y Limber, S. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 139-143. http://dx.d oi.org/10.101 6/j.copsyc.2017.04. 012.
  • Pérez-Salazar, M, (2020). La intervención judicial en los procesos judiciales con violencia de género. En F. Fariña y P. Ortuño (Eds), La gestión positiva de la ruptura de pareja con hijos (págs. 166-185). Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Quintana-Orts, C., Rey, L., y Worthington, E. (2019). The relationship between forgiveness, bullying and cyberbullying in adolescence: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20, 1-17. https://doi.org/1 0.1177/152483801 9869098.
  • Salmivalli, C. (2018). Peer victimization and adjustment in young adulthood: Commentary on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 67-72. http s://doi.org/1 0.1007/s10802-017-0372-8.
  • Satin, G. E., y Fisher, R. P. (2019). Investigative utility of the Cognitive Interview: Describing and finding perpetrators. Law and Human Behavior, 43(5), 491–506. https://do i.org/10.1037/lh b0000326.
  • Smith, P. K., y Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: lessons from two. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/(SIC I)1098-2337 (2000)26 :1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-7.
  • Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Clarendon Press.
  • Tulving, E., y Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373. https://do i.org/10.10 37/h0020071.
  • UNESCO (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. https://unesdoc.unesc o.org/ark:/4 8223/pf 0000366483.
  • Vallano, J. P., y Schreiber, N. (2015). Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(1), 85-99. https://doi.o rg/ 10.1037/ law00000 35.
  • Vallano, J. P., y Schreiber, N., (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport?building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock?crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960-970. https://doi.o rg/10.1002/acp. 1789.
  • Vallano, J., Evans, J. R., Schreiber, N., y Kieckhaefer, J. M. (2015). Rapport?building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey of law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 369-380. https://doi.or g/10.10 02/acp.311 5.
  • Vivolo-Kantor, A., Martell, B., Holland, K. M., y Westby, R. (2014). A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.avb.2014.0 6.008.
  • Wexler, D. B. (2000). Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An Overview. Western Michigan University Cooley Law, 17, 125-134. https://ssrn. com/abstra ct=256658.
  • Wexler, D. B. (2020). The DNA of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper, 20-43. https://ssr n.com/abstrac t=3731574.
  • Wexler, D. B. (2021). Justicia Terapéutica: La necesidad de la educación continua y la participación en una comunidad sólida de TJ. Revista Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica, 3. https://ar.ijeditore s.com/pop.ph p?option=artic ulo&Hash=0230 b45e5dadf574cc 8632712745 0530.
  • Wexler, D., y Winick, B. J. (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Carolina Academic Press.
  • Winsper, C., Lereya, T., Zanarini, M., y Wolke, D. (2012). Involvement in bullying and suicide-related behavior at 11 years: a prospective birth cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.jaac. 2012.01. 001.
  • Woo, J., Chang, S., Hong, J., Lee, D., Hahm, B., Cho, S., Park, J., [...] y Kim, B. (2019). The association of childhood experience of peer bullying with DSM-IV psychiatric disorders and suicidality in adults: Results from a nationwide survey in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(46), e295. https:// doi.org /10.3346/jk ms.201 9.34.e295.
  • Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., y Del Rey, R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1–21. https://do i.org/10.1 016/j.avb.2 015.10.00 1.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet