Las preguntas para la indagación y activación de pensamiento crítico en educación infantil

Bibliographic References

• Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Constructivism in teacher education: Considerations for those who would link practice to theory. ERIC Digest, vol. 1 (p. 7). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.1037/e587642011-001
• Bargiela, I., Puig, B. y Blanco-Anaya, P. (2018). Las prácticas científicas en infantil. Una aproximación al análisis del currículum y planes de formación del profesorado de Galicia. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 36(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2311
• Bargiela, I., Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P. y Avraamidou, L. (en revisión). Teacher’s questioning and students’ engagement in an inquiry-based activity in early childhood education. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
• Barnaby, B. (2016). From Theory to Practice: Critical Thinking as a Multifaceted Concept. A pilot study investigating consensus between students’ and tutors’ perceptions in higher education. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(3), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i3.209
• Biggers, M. (2018). Questioning Questions: Elementary Teachers’ Adaptations of Investigation Questions Across the Inquiry Continuum. Research in Science Education, 48, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9556-4
• Chin, C. y Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
• Choy, S. E. y Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198-206.
• Constantinou, C., Tsivitanidou, O. y Rybska, E. (2018). What is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning? En O. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca y C. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-23). Switzerland: Springer Publishing.
• Corral-Verdugo, V., Frias-Armenta, M. y Corral-Verdugo, B. (1996). Predictors of Environmental Critical Thinking: A Study of Mexican Children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(4), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1996.9941472
• Daniel, M-F., Gagnon, M. y Auriac-Slusarczyk, E. (2016). Dialogical critical thinking in kindergarten and elementary school. Studies on the impact of philosophical praxis in pupils. En G. M. Rollins, J. Haynes, y K. Murris (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (pp. 236-244). Londres: Routledge.
• Dovigo, F. (2016). Argumentation in preschool: a common ground for collaborative learning in early childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(6), 818-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2016.1239327
• Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. En M. Davies y R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 31-47). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Eren, C. D. y Akinoglu, O. (2013). Effect of problem-based learning (PBL) on critical thinking disposition in science education. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 14(3a), 1353-1361.
• Eshach, H. y Fried, M. N. (2005). Should Science be Taught in Early Childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
• Evagorou, M., Nicolau, C. y Lymbouridou, C. (2020). Modelling and Argumentation with Elementary School Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20, 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00076-9
• Facione, P. A. (2000). California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST-2000). California: California Academic Press.
• Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations (Report No. ED315423).
• Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., Facione, N. C. y Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1-25.
• Fleer, M. y Robbins, J. (2003). «Hit and Run Research» with «Hit and Miss» Results in Early Childhood Science Education. Research in Science Education, 33, 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000005249.45909.93
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
• Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4.ª ed.). Reino Unido: Routledge.
• Giri, V. y Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of collaborative scientific argumentation strategy argumentation on achievement in biology among 12th grade students. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(3), 344-353. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.03.67
• Glassner, A. y Schwarz, B. B. (2005). The antilogos ability to evaluate information supporting arguments. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.002
• Greene, J. A. y Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: the role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavorial and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223
• Harbi, A. (2016). «He isn’t an animal, he isn’t a human; he is just different»: exploring the medium of comics empowering children’s critical thinking. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 7(4), 431-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2016.1219956
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. y Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
• Hu, S., Kuh, G. D. y Li, S. (2008). The effects of engagement in inquiry-oriented activities on student learning and personal development. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9066-z
• Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical Thinking as Discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
• Kuhn, D. (1999). A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x028002016
• Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
• León, J. M. (2015). A Baseline Study of Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking in the Preschool Classroom. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 10, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.270
• Lipman, M., Sharp, A. y Oscanyan, F. S. (1992). La filosofía en el aula. Madrid: Ediciones de la Torre.
• Lu, Y-Y., Lin, H-S., Smith, T. J., Hong, Z-R. y Hsu, W-Y. (2020). The effects of critique driven inquiry intervention on students’ critical thinking and scientific inquiry competency. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 954-971. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.954
• Makar, K., Bakker, A. y Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Scaffolding norms of argumentation- based inquiry in a primary mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 1107-1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0732-1
• Mason, L. (1996). An analysis of children’s construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090404
• Metz, K. (2008). Narrowing the gulf between the practices of science and the elementary school science classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 138-161. https://doi.org/10.1086/590523
• Mills, A., Eurepos, G. y Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (vol. 1). California: SAGE Publications.
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J. y Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019). Science and Engineering for Grades 6-21. Investigation and Design at the Center. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25216
• National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
• NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
• Nussbaum, M. E. y Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-476x(02)00038-3
• Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OECD) (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD Learning Compass 2030. A series of concept notes. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
• Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P. y Bargiela, I. (2020). A Systematic Review on E-learning Environments for Promoting Critical Thinking in Higher Education. En M. J. Bishop, E. Boling, J. Elen, y V. Svihla. (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 345-3629). Cham: Springer.
• Puig, B., Crujeiras-Pérez, B., Bargiela, I. y Blanco-Anaya, P. (2021). Integration of Critical Thinking and Scientific Practices to Design-Based Pedagogy. En I. Elen (Ed.), Design Based Pedagogy book. Design Based Pedagogical Content Knowledge Across European Teacher Education Programs (pp. 89-128). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık,
• Puig, B. y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2022). The Integration of Critical thinking in Biology and Environmental Education. Contributions and Further Directions. En B. Puig y M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Critical thinking in Biology and Environmental Education. Facing Challenges in a Post-truth World. Springer.
• Saiz, C. y Rivas, S. (2017). Desarrollo del Pensamiento Crítico. En L. S. Almeida (Ed.), Criatividade e Pensamento Crítico: Conceito, Avaliação e Desenvolvimento, (pp. 133-179). Braga: Centro de Estudos e Recursos em Psicologia.
• Santika, A. R., Purwianingsih, W. y Nuraeni, E. (14 de octubre de 2018). Analysis of students critical thinking skills in socio-scientific issues of biodiversity subject [Comunicación oral]. 4th International Seminar of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education, Indonesia. https://doi.org/
• Tenreiro-Vieira, C. y Vieira, R. M. (2006). Diseño y validación de actividades de laboratorio para promover el pensamiento crítico de los alumnos. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 3(3), 452-466. https://doi.org/10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2006.v3.i3.07
• Torres Merchán, N. Y. y Solbes, J. (2016). Contribuciones de una intervención didáctica usando cuestiones sociocientíficas para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(2), 43-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1638
• Van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P. y Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: towards a pedagogical framework for primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660
• Vieira, R. M. y Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2014). Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
• Vieira, R. M., Tenreiro-Vieira, C. y Martins, E. (2010). Pensamiento crítico y literacia científica. Alambique, Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, 65, 96-104.
• Yuliati, L., Fauziah, R. y Hidayat, A. (octubre 14, 2018). Students’ critical thinking skills in authentic problem based learning [Comunicación oral]. 4th International Seminar of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education, Indonesia. https://doi.org/
• Zembal-Saul, C. (2008). Learning to Teach Elementary School Science as Argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20325