Saltarse las reglas como refuerzo de la comunidadExplorando las condiciones para la aceptación del furtivismo marisquero en Esteiro-Muros (Galicia)

  1. Hugo M. Ballesteros 1
  2. Gonzalo Rodríguez Rodríguez 1
  3. Helena Martínez Cabrera 1
  4. EDUARDO SÁNCHEZ-LLAMAS 2
  5. PABLO LAGO RAMA 3
  6. María do Carme García Negro 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Economía Aplicada, ECOPESCA
  2. 2 Departamento de Economía Aplicada, ECOPESCA, Santiago de Compostela
  3. 3 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Anuario de estudios marítimos

ISSN: 2792-9698

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 1

Páginas: 231-253

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario de estudios marítimos

Resumen

Este trabajo profundiza en las condiciones para la aceptación del furtivismo marisquero en Esteiro-Muros, A Coruña. Se identifican variables contextuales que modulan la permisividad del furtivismo marisquero y se analiza cuál es el objetivo de la creación de estas excepciones. A partir de una encuesta se profundiza en cómo las motivaciones para el furtivismo y los distintos perfiles de furtivos hacen variar el grado de aceptación del furtivismo en la comunidad de estudio. Se concluye que la tolerancia del furtivismo y la concesión de derechos informales de acceso y explotación de los recursos marisqueros ocurren sólo ocasionalmente y, cuando lo hacen, se reservan a personas comunitarias que actúan por motivaciones concretas, específicamente cuando actúan por Necesidad o para Autoconsumo. Se observa que la aceptación del furtivismo sirve como una herramienta de protección de la comunidad en un sentido amplio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ABURTO, J.; STOTZ, W.; CUNDILL, G. Social-Ecological Collapse: TURF Governance in the Context of Highly Variable Resources in Chile. Ecology and Society, v. 19, n. 1, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss1/art2/ES-2013-6145.pdf. Acesso em: 21 oct. 2014.
  • AGRAWAL, A.; GIBSON, C. C. The role of community in natural resource conservation. Communities and the environment: Ethnicity, gender, and the state in community based conservation, v. 27, n. 4, 2001.
  • BALLESTEROS, H. M. Cumprimento e adhesión á ordenación do marisqueo en contextos institucionais concretos: ánalise do furtivismo marisqueiro en Galicia. 2018. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2018. Disponível em: https://minerva.usc.es/xmlui/handle/10347/16701.
  • BALLESTEROS, H. M. et al. The Fewer Insider Poachers, the More Normative Compliance: Clues for Managing Poaching in the Shellfish Sector. Deviant Behavior, v. 42, n. 6, pp. 747-761, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1854635.
  • BALLESTEROS, H. M.; RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, G. How much in the clan are you? The community as an explanatory factor of the acceptance of poaching in small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, v. 97, n. June, pp. 188-196, 2018a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.014.
  • BALLESTEROS, H. M.; RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, G. “Acceptable” and “unacceptable” poachers: Lessons in managing poaching from the Galician shellfish sector. Marine Policy, v. 87, n. January 2018, pp. 104-110, ene. 2018b. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/‌retrieve/‌pii/‌S0308597X17304529.
  • BALLESTEROS, H. M.; RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, G. “Economic Crisis and Poaching: Advice on Anti-Poaching Management from The Galician Shellfish Sector”. Deviant Behavior, v. 40, n. 12, pp. 1508-1521, 2 dic. 2019. Disponível em: 10.1080/01639625.2018.1525804.
  • BALLESTEROS, H. M.; RODRÍGUEZ, G. R.; BANDE RAMUDO, R. Incentivos estructurales para la práctica del furtivismo marisquero en Galicia: una aproximación cualitativa. En: PUEYO LOSA, J.; URBINA, J. J. (Ed.). La reforma de la gobernanza pesquera internacional y europea. Pamplona: Aranzadi SAU/Thomson Reuters, 2017. pp. 233-251.
  • BELL, S.; HAMPSHIRE, K.; TOPALIDOU, S. The political culture of poaching: a case study from northern Greece. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 16, n. 2, pp. 399-418, 23 ene. 2007. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-005-3371-y. Acesso em: 10 feb. 2014.
  • BERGQUIST, M. Most People Think They Are More Pro-Environmental than Others: A Demonstration of the Better-than-Average Effect in Perceived Pro-Environmental Behavioral Engagement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, v. 42, n. 1, pp. 50-61, 2 ene. 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/‌01973533.2019.1689364.
  • BONNIFACE, L.; HENLEY, N. “A drop in the bucket”: Collective efficacy perceptions and environmental behaviour. Australian Journal of Social Issues, v. 43, n. 3, pp. 345-358, mar. 2008. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/‌j.1839-4655.2008.tb00107.x.
  • BOONSTRA, W. J.; BIRNBAUM, S.; BJÖRKVIK, E. The quality of compliance: investigating fishers’ responses towards regulation and authorities. Fish and Fisheries, v. 18, n. 4, pp. 682-697, 2017.
  • CALO LOURIDO, F. A cultura da terra e a cultura do mar. Portvgalia, v. 35, pp. 151-163, 2014.
  • CEPIĆ, D.; NUNAN, F. Justifying non-compliance: The morality of illegalities in small scale fisheries of Lake Victoria, East Africa. Marine Policy, v. 86, n. September, pp. 104-110, dic. 2017. Disponível em: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/‌retrieve/‌pii/‌S0308597X17304104.
  • COX, M.; ARNOLD, G.; VILLAMAYOR TOMÁS, S. A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society, v. 15, n. 4, 2010.
  • FAO. Technical Guidelines on methodologies and indicators for the estimation of the magnitude and impact of IUU fishing. Volume 3.1: a practical guide for undertaking IUU fishing estimation studies. v. 3, n. January 2020, 2021.
  • FIELD, A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3. ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2009.
  • FREIRE, J.; GARCÍA-ALLUT, A. Socioeconomic and biological causes of management failures in European artisanal fisheries: the case of Galicia (NW Spain). Marine Policy, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 375-384, sep. 2000. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/‌science/‌article/‌pii/‌S0308597X00000130. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2014.
  • GARCÍA-NEGRO (DIR.), M. D. C. Táboa Input Output Pesca-Conserva Galega 1995. Santiago de Compostela: Conselleria de Pesca, Marisqueo e Acuicultura, Xunta de Galicia., 1997.
  • GARCÍA-NEGRO (DIR.), M. D. C. INPUT-OUTPUT TABLES FOR THE GALICIAN FISHING AND PRESERVED FISH SECTORS. Santiago de Compostela: Consellería de Pesca e Asuntos Marítimos, 2003.
  • GARCÍA-NEGRO, M. C. et al. Táboas Input-Output da Pesca-Conservas Galega 2011. 1. ed. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia, 2016a.
  • GARCÍA-NEGRO, M. do C. Economía pesqueira: achegas desde un curso universitario. Santiago de Compostela: Sotelo Blanco, 2010.
  • GARCÍA-NEGRO, M. do C. A pesca: actividade económica estratéxica. (Porto Celeiro, Ed.) En: XVIII Xornadas Técnicas de Difusión do Sector Pesqueiro. Novembro de 2013., Celeiro. Anais… Celeiro: Porto Celeiro, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyIzvzCHs2Y.
  • GARCÍA-NEGRO, M. do C.; ZOTES TARRÍO, Y. N. El trabajo de las mujeres en el sector pesquero gallego : análisis de los problemas relacionados con su tratamiento estadístico. Revistas Galega de Economía, v. 15, pp. 1-25, 2006.
  • GELCICH, S. et al. Fishers’ perceptions on the Chilean coastal TURF system after two decades: Problems, benefits, and emerging needs. Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 93, n. 1, pp. 53-67, 2017.
  • GEZELIUS, S. Regulation and Compliance in the Atlantic Fisheries: State/Society Relations in the Management of Natural Resources. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.
  • GEZELIUS, S. Food, money, and morals: Compliance among natural resource harvesters. Human Ecology, v. 32, n. 5, pp. 615-634, 2004.
  • GIFFORD, R. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, v. 66, n. 4, pp. 290-302, 2011. Disponível em: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0023566.
  • GONZÁLEZ ARIAS, M. Á.; MOLANO MARTÍN, F. J.; BANDÍN BUJÁN, C. O Furtivismo Mariño e a súa incidencia na Comunidade Autónoma de Galicia. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia, 2011.
  • HAUCK, M. Small-scale Fisheries Compliance: Integrating Social Justice, Legitimacy and Deterrence. En: POMEROY, R. S.; ANDREW, N. (Ed.). Small-scale Fisheries Management Frameworks and Approaches for the Developing World. [s.l.] CABI, 2011. pp. 196-215.
  • HOFF, A. et al. Potential Economic Consequences of the Landing Obligation. [s.d.]
  • JENTOFT, S. Institutions in fisheries: what they are, what they do, and how they change. Marine Policy, v. 28, pp. 137-149, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/‌science/‌article/‌pii/‌S0308597X0300085X. Acesso em: 4 sep. 2014.
  • JENTOFT, S.; MCCAY, B. J.; WILSON, D. C. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, v. 22, n. 4-5, pp. 423-436, jul. 1998.
  • KING, G. et al. Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • MARTÍNEZ-CABRERA, H.; RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, G.; M. BALLESTEROS, H. Degradación das institucións sociais e usos do solo: mecanismos de retroalimentación entre forestación e condicións de habitabilidade no rural. Revista Galega de Economía, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 1-18, 16 oct. 2020. Disponível em: https://revistas.usc.gal/‌index.php/‌rge/article/‌view/6909.
  • MAYA JARIEGO, I. et al. A tale of two coasts: Networks of artisanal boat skippers in a fishing reserve in the Gulf of Cádiz and a recreational port in Islas Baleares. Ocean & Coastal Management, v. 161, n. November 2017, pp. 105-116, 2018. Disponível em: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/‌retrieve/‌pii/‌S0964569117309146.
  • MUCHAPONDWA, E.; BRICK, K.; VISSER, M. Abalone conservation in the presence of drug use and corruption: implications for its management in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, v. 6, n. 2, p. 201, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60348.
  • OSTROM, E. Governing the commons. [s.l.] Cambridge university press, 2015. OYANEDEL, R. et al. Illegal fishing and territorial user rights in Chile. Biology, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 619-627, 2018.
  • OYANEDEL, R.; GELCICH, S.; MILNER-GULLAND, E. J. A synthesis of (non-)compliance theories with applications to small-scale fisheries research and practice. Fish and Fisheries, v. 21, n. 6, pp. 1120-1134, 2020.
  • PETERSON, N. A.; SPEER, P. W.; McMILLAN, D. W. Validation of A Brief Sense of Community Scale : Confirmation of the Principal Theory of Sense of Community. Journal of Community Psychology, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 61-73, 2008.
  • REYES, R. B.; POMBO, O. A.; DÍAZ, G. P. Fishers’ Reasons for Poaching Abalone (Haliotidae): A Study in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, v. 29, n. 1, pp. 237-244, feb. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1577/M06-032.1. Acesso em: 25 feb. 2014.
  • RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, G. et al. On the Role of Perception: Understanding Stakeholders’ Collaboration in Natural Resources Management through the Evolutionary Theory of Innovation. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 6, p. 3564, 23 mar. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3564.
  • RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZ, G.; GARCÍA NEGRO, M. do C. Impacto económico para a flota palangreira de superficie galega da norma de aletas adheridas. [s.l: s.n.].
  • SANDSTRÖM, A.; BODIN, Ö.; CRONA, B. Network Governance from the top – The case of ecosystem-based coastal and marine management. Marine Policy, v. 55, pp. 57-63, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.009.
  • SARGISSON, R. J. et al. By-and-Buy: The Effect of Social Influence on Discounting of Environmental Outcomes. Sustainability and Climate Change, v. 14, n. 4, pp. 217-226, 1 ago. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/scc.2021.0003.
  • SEQUEIROS, J. L. A despensa de area: cambio social e formas productivas no sector marisqueiro das Rías Baixas galegas. Vigo: Edicións Xerais de Galicia, 1995.
  • SONG, A. M. et al. Collateral damage? Small-scale fisheries in the global fight against IUU fishing. Fish and Fisheries, v. 21, n. 4, pp. 831-843, 2020.
  • STEG, L. et al. An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 38, pp. 104-115, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/‌science/‌article/‌pii/‌S027249441400005X.
  • VILELA, R. et al. The use of a spatial model of economic efficiency to predict the most likely outcomes under different fishing strategy scenarios. Marine Policy, v. 129, n. April, p. 104499, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104499.
  • XUNTA DE GALICIA. Lei 11/2008, do 3 de decembro, de pesca de Galicia. Diario Oficial de Galicia, v. 243, pp. 22275-22317, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.xunta.gal/dog/‌Publicados/‌2008/‌20081216/‌Anuncio4C1EE_es.html.
  • XUNTA DE GALICIA. PescadeGalicia.com-Statistical Reports. Disponível em: www.pescadegalicia.com.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet