En torno al surgimiento de la figura social del filósofo en las ciudades griegas

  1. Marco Virgilio García Quintela 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Journal:
Gerión

ISSN: 0213-0181

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 40

Issue: 1

Pages: 37-72

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/GERI.79215 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Gerión

Abstract

The article proposes a historical study of the pre-Socratic philosophers as social beings. For this purpose, information from two well-known catalogues is cross-referenced: Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker by H. Diels and W. Kranz (8th edition 1956) and the Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis edited by M. H. Hansen and T. H. Nielsen (2004). The 106 philosophers in the former catalogue come from 40 of the 1035 cities examined in the latter. This finding is combined with the examination of biographical information about the philosophers and the characteristics of the cities where they live. The sketch of the "city with philosophers" shows the predominance of colonial cities, with larger territories, stable external relations, and a rich and relatively well-known institutional life. These aspects are reflected in their greater social complexity, of which philosophers are an additional indication. It is also noteworthy how philosophical ideas spread largely through the networks linking metropolises and colonies, and the scarce and late presence of philosophers in mainland Greece.

Bibliographic References

  • Albanese Procelli, R. M. (1996): “Appunti sulla distribuzione delle anfore commerciali nella Sicilia arcaica”, Kokalos 42, 91-137.
  • Barry, A. – Born, G. (eds.), (2013): Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, London–New York.
  • Baumbach, J. D. (2004): The Significance of Votive Offerings in Selected Hera Sanctuaries in the Peloponnese, Ionia and Western Greece (=BAR International Series 1249), Oxford.
  • Bieler, L. (1967): Theios aner. Das Bild des “göttlichen Menschen” in Spätantike & Frühchristentum, Darmstadt.
  • Boardman, J. – Hammond, N. G. L. (eds.), (1982): Cambridge Ancient History, vol. III, part 3: The Expansion of the Greek World, Eighth to Sixth Centuries B.C., Cambridge (https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521234474).
  • Bonacasa, N. (1992): “Da Agrigento a Himera: la proiezione culturale”, [en] Braccesi – De Miro (eds.), 1992, 133-150.
  • Bowersock, G. W. (1991): “Momigliano’s quest for the Person”, History and Theory 30, 27-36 (http://doi.org/10.2307/2505510).
  • Braccesi, L. – De Miro, E. (eds.), (1992): Agrigento e la Sicilia Greca. Atti della settimana di studio. Agrigento 1988, 2-8 maggio, Roma.
  • Brisson, L. (1990): “Mythes, écriture, philosophie”, [en] J.-F. Mattéi (ed.), La naissance de la raison en Grèce, Paris, 49-58.
  • Burkert, W. (1972): Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, Cambridge (Mss.).
  • Capizzi, A. (1975): La porta di Parmenide. Due saggi per una nuova lettura del poema (=Edizioni dell’Ateneo. Filologia e critica 14), Roma.
  • Capizzi, A. (1979): Eraclito e la sua leggenda. Proposta di una diversa lettura dei frammenti (=Edizioni dell’Ateneo. Filologia e critica 34), Roma.
  • Capizzi, A. (1982): La repubblica cosmica. Appunti per una storia non peripatetica della nascita della filosofia in Grecia (=Edizioni dell’Ateneo. Filologia e critica 43), Roma.
  • Cherniss, H. (1991): La crítica aristotélica a la filosofía presocrática, México.
  • Colli, G. (1977): La sapienza greca, vol. I: Dionisio, Apollo, Eleusi, Orfeo, Museo, Iperborei, Enigma (=Adelphi 14), Milano.
  • Colli, G. (1991): La sagesse grecque, vol. II: Épiménide, Phérécyde, Thalès, Anaximandre, Anaximène, Onomacrite, Téophraste, “Opinions des physiciens I”, Combas.
  • Couliano, I. P. (1994): Experiencias del éxtasis (=Paidós. Orientalia 40), Barcelona.
  • Couloubaritsis, L. (1990): Mythe et Philosophie chez Parménide, Brussels.
  • Davidson, J. A. (1953): “Protagoras, Democritus and Anaxagoras”, Classical Quarterly 3/1-2, 33-45 (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800002585).
  • De la Genière, J. (dir.), (1997): Héra. Images, espaces, cultes. Actes du Colloque International du Centre de Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Lille III et de l’Association P.R.A.C. Lille, 29-30 novembre 1993, Naples (https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pcjb.905).
  • De Polignac, F. (1995): La naissance de la cité grecque, Paris.
  • Delatte, A. (1922): La Vie de Pythagore de Diogène Laërce, Brussels.
  • Delatte, A. (1979): Essai sur la politique pythagoricienne (=Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. 29), Genève.
  • Detienne, M. (1962): Homère, Hésiode et Pythagores. Poésie et philosophie dans le pythagorisme ancien (=Collection Latomus 57), Brussels.
  • Detienne, M. (1981): Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris.
  • Diehls, H. (1879): Doxographi graeci, Berolini.
  • Drachmann, A. B. (1977): Atheism in Pagan Antiquity, Chicago (ed. prin. London, 1922).
  • Fowler, R. L. (1997): “Polos of Akragas: Testimonia”, Mnemosyne 50/1, 27-34.
  • Frodeman, R. (2014): Sustainable Knowledge. A Theory of Interdisciplinarity, New York.
  • Frodeman, R. et alii (eds.), (2010): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford (https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.001.0001).
  • FVS = Diels, H. – Kranz, W. (eds.), (1974): Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Weidmann (reimpresión de la 8ª edición de 1956).
  • García Gual, C. (1989): Los Siete Sabios (y Tres Más), Madrid.
  • García Quintela, M. V. (1987): “L’anthropogonie d’Anaximandre. Problèmes d’interprétation tournant autour de la sagesse milésienne archaïque”, Quaderni di storia 26, 161-167.
  • García Quintela, M. V. (1992): El Rey Melancólico. Antropología de los fragmentos de Heráclito (=Taurus Ediciones. Humanidades 340), Madrid.
  • García Quintela, M. V. (1996): “Le Livre d’Anaximandre et la société de Milet”, Metis 11, 37-68 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/metis.1996.1046).
  • García Quintela, M. V. (2000): “Hipódamo en Turios: urbanismo, religión y política”, Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 26/1, 7-33 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/dha.2000.2410).
  • García Quintela, M. V. (2001a): “Anthropologie et colonisation chez Anaxagore (D-K 59 B 4 et son contexte historique et social)”, Ancient Society 31, 329-341 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/AS.31.0.52).
  • García Quintela, M. V. (2001b): “Tales de Mileto en Heródoto, en la frontera entre saberes y culturas”, [en] P. López Barja – S. Rebordea Morillo (eds.), Fronteras e identidad en el mundo griego antiguo. III Reunión de Historiadores (Santiago-Trasalba, 25-27 de septiembre de 2000), Santiago de Compostela–Vigo, 29-55.
  • García Quintela, M. V. (2002a): “Protagoras et le panthéon de Thourioi”, Revue de l’histoire des religions 219, 131-140 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rhr.2002.966).
  • García Quintela, M. V. (2002b): “La destrucción de Síbaris y la mitopoiesis pitagórica”, Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 28/2, 19-39 (https://doi.org/10.3406/dha.2002.2471).
  • Gentili, B. (1984): Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia Antica. Da Omero al V secolo, Bari.
  • Giangiulio, M. (1989): Ricerche su Crotone Arcaica (=Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.
  • Pubblicazioni della Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 6), Pisa.
  • Gigante, M. (1983): Diogene Laerzio: Vite dei Filosofi (=Biblioteca Universale Laterza 98-99), Roma–Bari.
  • Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (dir.), (1999): Diogène Laërce. Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Paris.
  • Graham, A. J. (1982a): “The Colonial expansion of Greece”, [en] Boardman – Hammond (eds.), 1982, 83-162.
  • Graham, A. J. (1982b): “The Western Greeks”, [en] Boardman – Hammond (eds.), 1982, 163-195.
  • Graham, A. J. (1983): Colony and Mother City in Ancient Greece, Chicago.
  • Graham, A. J. (1991): “Adopted Teians: a passage in the new inscription of Public Imprecations from Teos”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 111, 176-178 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/631896).
  • Graham, A. J. (1992): “Abdera and Teos”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 112, 44-47 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/632152).
  • Hadot, P. (1995): Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? (=Gallimard. Collection Folio 280), Paris.
  • Hansen, M. H. (2004): “Introductión”, [en] IACP, 3-153.
  • Hirsch Hadorn G. et alii (eds.), (2008): Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht–London.
  • Hönle, A. (1972): Olympia in der Politik der griechischen Staatenwelt. Von 776 bis zum Ende des 5. Jahrhunderts, Bebenhausen.
  • Humphreys, S. C. (1975): “‘Transcendence’ and Intellectual Roles: The Ancient Greek Case”, Daedalus 104/2, 91-118.
  • Huutoniemi, K. (2010): “Evaluating interdisciplinary research”, [en] Frodeman et alii (eds.), 2016, 309-20 (https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.40).
  • IACP = Hansen, M. H. – Nielsen, T. H. (eds.), (2004): An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis, Oxford.
  • Ismard, P. (2017): L’événement Socrate, Paris.
  • Jennings, V. – Katsaros, A. (eds.), (2007): The World of Ion of Chios (=Mnemosyne, Suppl. 288), Leiden–Boston (https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160453.i-451).
  • Joly, R. (1956): Le thème philosophique des genres de vie dans l’Antiquité Classique, Brussels.
  • Kahn, Ch. H. (1960): Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, New York.
  • Keshen, J. – Perrier, S. (eds.), (2005): Building New Bridges. Sources, Methods and Interdisciplinarity, Ottawa (https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ch77q1).
  • Krohn, W. (2010): “Interdisciplinary Cases and Disciplinary Knowledge”, [en] Frodeman et alii (eds.), 2016, 31-38 (https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.5).
  • Lamont, M. – Mallard, G. – Guetzkow, J. (2006): “Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation”, Research Evaluation 15, 43-55 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776002).
  • Lanzillotta, E. (1987): Paro dall’età arcaica all’età ellenistica (=Università degli Studi di Macerata. Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia 40), Roma.
  • Lepore, E. (1970): “Strutture della colonizzazione focea in Occidente”, Parola del Passato 20, 7-54.
  • Martínez Nieto, R. B. (2000): La aurora del pensamiento griego. Las cosmogonías prefilosóficas de Hesíodo, Alcmán, Ferecides, Epiménides, Museo y la Teogonía órfica antigua, Madrid.
  • McDiarmid, J. B. (1953): “Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 61, 85-156 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/310774).
  • Mejer, J. (1978): Diogenes Laertios and his Hellenistic Background (=Hermes 40), Wiesbaden.
  • Mejer, J. (1992): “Diogenes Laertios and the Transmission of Greek Philosophy”, ANRW, II, 36, 5, New York–Berlin, 3556-3602.
  • Mele, A. (1982): “La Megale Hellas pitagorica: aspetti politici, economici e sociali”, [en] Megale Hellas. Nome e immagine. Atti del ventunesimo convegno di Studi sulla Magna Grecia. Taranto 2-5 ottobre 1981, Taranto, 33-80.
  • Minar, E. L. (1942): Early Pythagorean Politics in Practice and Theory, Baltimore.
  • Momigliano, A. (1986): Génesis y desarrollo de la biografía en Grecia, Madrid.
  • Moore, Ch. (2020): Calling Philosophers Names: On the Origin of a Discipline, Princeton–Oxford.
  • Morgan, C. (2003): Early Greek States Beyond the Polis, London–New York.
  • Nails, D. (2002): The People of Plato. A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics, Indianapolis–Cambridge.
  • Porter, A. L. – Rossini, F. A. (1985): “Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals”, Science, Technology, & Human Values 10, 33-38 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224398501000304).
  • Prontera, F. (1976-1977): “Gli ‘ultimi’ Pitagorici. Contributo per una revisione della tradizione”, Dialoghi de Archeologia 9-10, 267-332.
  • Rafols, I. – Leydesdorff, L. –O’Hare, A. – Nightingale, P. – Stirling, A. (2012): “How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management”, Research Policy 41, 1262-1282 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015).
  • Redfield, J. M. (2003): The Locrian Maidens. Love and Death in Greek Italy, Princeton–Oxford.
  • Renaut, O. – Macé, A. (2013): “L’univers au service de la cité: l’image publique du philosophe”, [en] A. Macé (dir.), Le Savoir public, la vocation politique du savoir en Grèce ancienne (=Les cahiers de la MSH Ledoux 7), Besançon, 103-165.
  • Sakellariou, M. B. (1958): La migration grecque en Ionie (=Collection de l’Institut français d’Athènes 17), Athènes.
  • Salem, J. (1996): Démocrite. Grains de poussière dans un rayon de soleil, Paris.
  • Sauzeau, (2005): Les partages d’Argos. Sur les pas des Danaïdes, Paris.
  • Small, J. P. (1997): Wax Tablets of the Mind. Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity, London–New York.
  • Terceiro Sanmartín, N. (2019): “Diógenes «el Cínico» entre la anécdota y la historia”, Cuadernos de filología clásica: Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 29, 113-132 (https://doi.org/10.5209/CFCG.63588).
  • Toye, D. L. (1997): “Pherecydes of Syros: Ancient Theologian and Genealogist”, Mnemosyne 50, 530-560 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568525972662213).
  • Untersteiner, M. (1956): Senofane. Testimonianze e frammenti, Firenze.
  • Untersteiner, M. (1967): I sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti. I. Protagora e Seniade, Firenze.
  • Vernant, J.-P. (1973): Los Orígenes del Pensamiento Griego, Buenos Aires.
  • Vernant, J.-P. (1985): Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs. Études de psychologie historique, Paris.
  • Vidal-Naquet, P. (1990): La démocratie grecque vue d’ailleurs, Paris.
  • Vlastos, G. (1947): “Equality and Justice in Early Greek Cosmologies”, Classical Philology 42/3, 156-178 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/363029).
Data source: Dialnet