The impact of soft budget constraint on the fiscal co-responsibility of the autonomous communities in SpainThe case of extraordinary liquidity funds (2012-2019)

  1. Santiago Calvo López 1
  2. María Cadaval Sampedro 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España


Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

ISSN: 0210-1173

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 240

Pages: 151-190

Type: Article

More publications in: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics


Cited by

  • Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 3 (24-09-2023)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2022
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.7
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 0.6
  • Article influence score: 0.18
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: ECONOMICS Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 344/380 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2022
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.215
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: Finance Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 234/313
  • Area: Economics and Econometrics Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 546/720

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2021)
  • Year 2021
  • Journal Impact: 0.520
  • Field: DERECHO Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 25/355
  • Field: ECONOMÍA Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 29/163
  • Field: DERECHO FINANCIERO Y TRIBUTARIO Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 1/19


  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2022
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.8
  • Area: Finance Percentile: 21
  • Area: Economics and Econometrics Percentile: 18

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2022
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.21
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: ECONOMICS Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 466/581


According to the Second Generation of Theories of Fiscal Federalism, if subcentral governments can increase the level of spending without taking responsibility for the cost due to the existence of a soft budget constraint, incentives are created for financially irresponsible behavior. Since 2012, the central government in Spain has created various funds with the aim of improving the liquidity of the Autonomous Communities, but their design has meant that the latter can obtain resources at little cost. This paper tests the hypothesis under which the regions that have received more extraordinary liquidity funds have had a less prudent fiscal behavior, finding no evidence of it. The level of unemployment, the financial insufficiency and the electoral cycle of the budget are the determining factor in explaining greater non-compliance with deficit and debt targets and higher deficit and debt growth rates.

Bibliographic References

  • Allers, M. (2015), “The Dutch Local Government Bailout Puzzle”, Public Administration, 93(2): 451- 470.
  • Arellano, M. (2003), Panel data econometrics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Baskaran, T. (2010), “On the link between decentralization and public debt in OECD countries”, Public Choice, 145(3): 351-378.
  • Baskaran, T. (2012), “Soft budget constraints and strategic interaction in subnational borrowing: Evidence from the German States, 1975-2005”, Journal of Urban Economics, 71(1): 114-127.
  • Bond, S. (2002), “Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice”, Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2): 141-162.
  • Bordignon, M. and Turati, G. (2009), “Bailing out expectations and public health expenditure”, Journal of Health Economics, 28(2): 305-321.
  • Castedo, T., Herrero, A. and Tránchez, J. M. (2019), “La Condición Financiera de las CCAA antes y después de los mecanismos de liquidez”, Manuscrito no publicado, XXVI Encuentro de Economía Pública, Oviedo.
  • Delgado, M., Lledó, V. and Pérez, J. (2016), “On the determinants of fiscal non-compliance: an empirical analysis of Spain’s regions”, Banco de España, Documentos de Trabajo, n.º 1632.
  • Eyraud, L. and Lusinyan, L, (2011), “Decentralizing Spending more than Revenue: Does it Hurt Fiscal Performance?”, IMF Working Paper, 11/226.
  • Fernández, R. (2016), “Control del endeudamiento autonómico y estabilidad presupuestaria: Evolución y propuestas de future”, Revista de Estudios Regionales, 105: 103-136.
  • Fernández, R., Lago-Peñas, S and Martínez-Vázquez, J. (2013), “La autonomía tributaria de las comunidades autónomas y su (des)uso: Presencia de una restricción presupuestaria blanda”, in S. Lago-Peñas and J. Martínez-Vázquez (dir.), La consolidación fiscal en España: El papel de las comunidades autónomas y los municipios (experiencias, retos y perspectivas), Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, 119-146.
  • Fuente, A. de la (2019a), “Las ayudas implícitas en los mecanismos adicionales de financiación a las Comunidades Autónomas”, FEDEA, Estudios sobre la Economía Española, 2019/31.
  • Fuente, A. de la (2019b), “Las finanzas autonómicas en 2018 y entre 2013 y 2018”, BBVA Research, Documento de Trabajo, 19/06.
  • García-Milà, T., Goodspeed, T. and Mcguire, T. (2001), “Fiscal decentralization policies and sub-national government debt in evolving federations”, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Economic Working Papers, n.º 549.
  • Goodspeed, T. (2017), “Bailouts and Soft Budget Constraints in Decentralized Government: A Synthesis and Survey of an Alternative View of Intergovernmental Gran Policy”, Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, 220(2): 113-134.
  • Herrero, A., Martín, J. and Tránchez, J. M. (2019), “Condición financiera y fondos de liquidez en España: un enfoque regional”, Revista de Estudios Regionales, 114: 91-117.
  • Inman, R. (2003), “Transfers and Bailouts: Enforcing Local Fiscal Discipline with Lessons from U.S. Federalism”, in J. Rodden, G. Eskeland and J. Litvack (eds.), Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 35-83.
  • Kornai, J. (1980), Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • Kotia, A. and Lledó, V. (2016), “Do Subnational Fiscal Rules Foster Fiscal Discipline? New Empirical Evidence from Europe”, IMF Working Paper, 16/84.
  • Lago-Peñas, S. (2005), “Envolving Federations and Regional Public Deficits: Testing the Bailout Hypothesis in the Spanish Case”, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 23(3): 437-453.
  • Lago-Peñas, S. (2012), “La nueva estabilidad presupuestaria en España: un enfoque centralizador”, Informe IEB sobre Federalismo Fiscal, 12: 76-79.
  • Lago-Peñas, S. and Fernández, X. (2013), “Las finanzas autonómicas: expansión y crisis, 2002-2012”, Papeles de Economía Española, 138: 129-146.
  • Lago-Peñas, S., Fernández, X. and Vaquero, A. (2017), “¿Por qué incumplen fiscalmente las Comunidades Autónomas?”, Journal of Regional Research, 37: 7-29.
  • Leal, A. and López-Laborda, J. (2013), “Un estudio de los factores determinantes de las desviaciones presupuestarias de las Comunidades Autónomas en el período 2003-2012”, Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros, Documento de Trabajo, n.º 735/2013.
  • Medina, M. (2013), “El Estado Autonómico en tiempos de disciplina fiscal”, Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 98: 109-147.
  • Nickell, S. (1981), “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects”, Econometrica, 49(6): 1417-1426.
  • Oates, W. E. (1972), Fiscal federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Oates, W. E. (2005), “Toward A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism”, International Tax and Public Finance, 12: 349-373.
  • Pérez, J. and Prieto, R. (2014), “The structure of sub-national public debt: liquidity vs credit risk”, Banco de España, Documento de Trabajo, n.º 1403.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004), “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435.
  • Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2010), “Dynamic Commitment and the Soft Budget Constraint: An Empirical Test”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(3): 154-179.
  • Pöschl, C. and Weingast, B. (2015), “A Fiscal Interest Approach: The Design of Tax and Transfer System”, in J.-P. Faguet and C. Pöschl (eds.), Is Decentralization Good for Development?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163-178.
  • Rodden, J. (2002), “The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance around the World”, American Journal of Political Science, 46(3): 670-687.
  • Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. and Litvack, J. (2003), “Introduction and Overview”, in J. Rodden, G. Eskeland and J. Litvack (eds.), Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3-31.
  • Ruiz, V. and Cuenca, A. (2014), “Estabilidad presupuestaria en las comunidades autónomas: más allá de la reforma de la Constitución”, Cuadernos de Información Económica, 241: 35-44.
  • Ter-Minassian, T. (2007), “Fiscal Rules for Subnational Governments: Can They Promote Fiscal Discipline?”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 6(3): 1-13.
  • Ter-Minassian, T. (2015), “Promoting Responsible and Sustainable Fiscal Decentralization”, in E. Ahmad and G. Brosio (eds.), Handbook of Multi-level Finance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 437-458.
  • Weingast, B. (2009), “Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentive”, Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3): 279-293.
  • Wildasin, D. (1997), “Externalities and bailouts: hard and soft budget constraints in intergovernmental fiscal relations”, Policy Research Working Paper, 1843, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.