The effect of behavioral biases on financial decisions

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ackert, L., Church, B., Tompkins, J. y Zhang, P. (2005). What’s in a name? An experimental examination of investment behavior. Review of Finance 9, 281-304.
• Adam, M. y Kroll, E. (2012). Physiological evidence of attraction to chance. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics 5(3), 152-165.
• Ahern, K., Daminelli, D. y Fracassi, C. (2015). Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. Journal of Financial Economics 117(1), 165-189.
• Akerlof, G. (1979). The case against conservative macroeconomics: An inaugural lecture. Economica, 46, 219-237.
• Akerlof, G. y Shiller, R. (2009). How animal spirits destabilize economies. McKinsey Quarterly 3, 127-135.
• Alary, D., Gollier, C. y Treich, N. (2013). The effect of ambiguity aversion on insurance and self-protection. The Economic Journal, 123, 1188-1202.
• Alós-Ferrer, C. y Hügelschäfer, S. (2012). Faith in intuition and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84, 182-192.
• Alpert, M. y Raifa, H. (1969). A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. (Edts.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M. y Rutström, E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76(3), 583–618.
• Andreoni, J. y Sprenger, C. (2012). Risk preferences are not time preferences. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3357-76.
• Argyle, M. (1991). Cooperation: The basis of sociability. Routledge.
• Ariely, D., Bracha, A. y Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 544-555.
• Arkes, H., Hirshleifer, D., Jiang, D. y Lim, S. (2008). Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 67–81.
• Arkes, H., Hirshleifer, D., Jiang, D. y Lim, S. (2010). A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: Evidence from China, Korea and the US. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 99-111.
• Asch, S. (1952). Social Psychology. Prentice Hall.
• Baker, M., Ruback, R. y Wurgler, J. (2007). Behavioral corporate finance: A survey. Eckbo, E. (edit.). The handbook of corporate finance: empirical corporate finance. Elsevier.
• Ball, R., Kothari, S. y Nikolaev, V. (2013). Econometrics of the Basu asymmetric timeliness coefficient and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 1071-97.
• Ball, S. y Eckel, C. (1998). The economic value of status. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(4), 495-514.
• Ball, S., Eckel, C., Grossman, P. y Zane, W. (2001). Status in markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 161-188.
• Barber, B. y Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
• Barber, B. y Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785-818.
• Barberis, N. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in Economics: A review and assessment. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173-195.
• Barberis, N. y Huang, M. (2001), Mental accounting, loss aversion and individual stock returns, The Journal of Finance 56(4), 1247-92.
• Barberis, N., Huang, M. y Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1-53.
• Barberis, N., Huang, M. y Thaler, R. (2006). Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. American Economic Review, 96, 1069–1090.
• Barberis, N. y Huang, M. (2007). The loss aversion/narrow framing approach to the equity premium puzzle. Mehra, R. (edit.) Handbook of Investments: Equity Premium, (pp. 199–229).
• Barberis, N. y Huang, M. (2008). Stock as lotteries: The implication of probability weighting for security prices. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2066–2100.
• Barberis, N. y Huang, M. (2009). Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks. Journal of Economics Dynamics & Control, 33(8), 1555-76.
• Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. y Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307-343.
• Barberis, N. y Shleifer, A. (2003). Style investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 161-199.
• Barberis, N. y Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of Behavioral Finance. Constantinides, G., Harris, M. y Stulz, R. (edits.). Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1(1), 1053-1128.
• Bar-Hillel, M. (1973). On the subjective probability of compound events. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 9, 396-406.
• Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37.
• Battalio, R., Lerman, A., Livnat, J. y Mendenhall, R. (2012). Who, if anyone, reacts to accrual information? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 205-224.
• Baucells, M., Weber, M. y Welfens, F. (2011). Reference point formation and updating: Theory and experiments. Journal Management Science, 57(3), 506-519.
• Belsky, G. y Gilovich, T. (1999). Why smart people make big money mistakes and how to correct them: Lessons from the new science of behavioral economics. Simon & Schuster.
• Bem, D. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 1(3), 199-218.
• Benartzi, S. (2001). Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock? American Economic Review, 91(1), 79-98.
• Benartzi, S. y Thaler, R. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73-92.
• Benartzi, S. y Thaler, R. (1999). Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science 45(3), 364-381.
• Beugelsdijk, S. y Frijns, B. (2010). A cultural explanation of the foreign bias in international asset allocation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2121-31.
• Biais, B., Hilton, D., Mazurier, K. y Pouget, S. (2005). Judgmental overconfidence, self-monitoring and trading performance in an experimental financial market. Review of Economic Studies, 72(2), 287-312.
• Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. y Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151-170.
• Bloom, N., Sadun, R. y van Reenen, J. (2015). The organization of firms across countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(4), 1663-1705.
• Bolton, G. y Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193.
• Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N. y Shleifer, A. (2012). Salience theory of choice under risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1243-85.
• Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N. y Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5), 803-843.
• Boyle, P., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R. y Wang, T. (2012). Keynes meets Markowitz: The trade-off between familiarity and diversification. Management Science, 58(2), 253-272.
• Bracha, A. y Brown, D. (2012). Affective decision making: A theory of optimism bias. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(1), 67-80.
• Briley, D., Shrum, L. y Wyer, R. (2013). Factors affecting judgments of prevalence and representation: Implications for public policy and marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32, 112-118.
• Burger, N., Charness, G. y Lynham, J. (2011). Field and online experiments on self-control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77(3), 393-404.
• Burnside, C., Han, B., Hirshleifer, D. y Wang, T. (2011). Investor overconfidence and the forward premium puzzle. Review of Economic Studies, 78(2), 523-558.
• Camerer, C. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. Kahneman y Tversky, A. (edits.). Choices, Values, and Frames, (pp. 288-300). Cambridge University Press.
• Camerer, C. y Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 306-318.
• Camerer, C. y Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: past, present, future. Camerer, G., Loewenstein y Rabin, M. (edits.). Advances in Behavioral Economics, (pp. 3-51). Princeton University Press.
• Camerer, C. y Thaler, R. (1995). Anomalies: ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209-219.
• Cao, H., Han, B., Hirshleifer, D. y Zhang, H. (2011). Fear of the unknown: familiarity and economic decisions. Review of Finance, 15(19), 173-206.
• Carlsson, F. y Martinsson, P. (2008). How much is too much? An investigation of the effect of the number of choice sets, context dependence and the choice of bid vectors in choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 40, 165-176.
• Carpenter, J. y Myers, C. (2010). Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, image, and incentives. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 911-920.
• Cason, T. y Plott, C. (2014). Misconceptions and game form recognition: Challenges to theories of revealed preference and framing. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1235-70.
• Cesarini, D., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. y Wallace, B. (2012). The behavioral genetics of behavioral anomalies. Management Science, 58(1), 21-34.
• Chan, L., Jegadeesh, N. y Lakonishok, J. (1996). Momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1681-1713.
• Chapman, G. y Johnson, E. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223-242.
• Chelley-Steeley, P., Kluger, B. y Steeley, J. (2015). Earnings and hindsight bias: An experimental study. Economic Letters, 134, 130-132.
• Chen, G., Kim, K., Nofsinger, J. y Rui, O. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 425-451.
• Chen, L., Kök, A. y Tong, J. (2013). The effect of payment schemes on inventory decisions: The role of mental accounting. Management Science, 59(2), 436-451.
• Chew, S., Ebstein, R. y Zhong, S. (2012). Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: Evidence from behavioral and gene association studies. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44(1), 1-18.
• Chou, H. y Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am’’: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 15(2), 117-121.
• Cokely, E. y Kelley, C. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgmental Decision Making, 4(1), 20–33.
• Cornelissen, J. y Werner, M. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181-235.
• Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (1990). Is the mind a frequentist? Second Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, LA, CA. Cited in G. Gigerenzer (1991), How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond ‘heuristics and biases’. Stroebe y Hewstone, M. (edits.). European Review of Social Psychology, Wiley.
• Cowen, A., Groysberg, B. y Healy, P. (2006). Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(1-2), 119-146.
• Cowley, E., Briley, D. y Farrell, C. (2015). How do gamblers maintain an illusion of control? Journal of Business Research, 68(10), 2181-88.
• Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. y Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1839-85.
• Das, S., Markowitz, H., Scheid, J. y Statman, M. (2010). Portfolio optimization with mental accounts. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2), 311-334.
• De Giorgi, E. y Legg, S. (2012). Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 36(7), 951-972.
• DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372.
• Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M. y Rand, D. (2012). Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games. Experimental Economics, 16(3), 349-371.
• Du, N. y Shelley, M. (2014). Exploring ambiguity and familiarity effects in the “earnings game” between managers and investors. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(1), 70-77.
• Duong, C., Pescetto, G. y Santamaria, D. (2014). How value-glamour investors use financial information: UK evidence of investors’ confirmation bias. The European Journal of Finance, 20(6), 524-549.
• Durante, R., Putterman, L. y van der Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 1059-1086.
• Edwards, W. (1968). Conservatism in human information processing. Reprinted short version in Kahneman, D. Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. (1982), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Einhorn, H. y Hogarth, R. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85(5), 395-416.
• Einhorn, H. y Hogarth, R. (1986). Decision making under ambiguity. Journal of Business, 59(4), S225-S250.
• Ent, M. y Baumeister, R. (2014). Obedience, self-control, and the voice of culture. Journal of Social Issues, 70(3), 574-586.
• Epley, N. y Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12(5), 391-396.
• Epley, N. y Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17(4), 311-318.
• Epley, N. y Gilovich, T. (2010). Anchoring unbound. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 20-24.
• Epstein, L. y Schneider, M. (2010). Ambiguity and asset markets. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2, 315-346.
• Erceg, N. y Galic, Z. (2014). Overconfidence bias and conjunction fallacy in predicting outcomes of football matches. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 52-62.
• Etner, J., Jeleva, M. y Tallon, J. (2012). Decision theory under ambiguity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 234-270.
• Falk, A., Fehr, E. y Fischbacher, U. (2003). On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry, 41(1), 20-26.
• Fellner, G. y Sutter, M. (2009). Causes, consequences, and cures of myopic loss aversion: An experimental investigation. The Economic Journal, 119, 900-916.
• Fellner, W. (1961). Distortion of subjective probabilities as a reaction to uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 670-690.
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
• Finucane, M., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P. y Johnson, M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1-17.
• Fischhoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press.
• Frankel, J. y Schreger, J. (2013). Over-optimistic official forecasts and fiscal rules in the Eurozone. Review of World Economics, 149(2), 247-272.
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
• Frederick, S., Kahneman, D. y Mochon, D. (2010). Elaborating a simpler theory of anchoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 17-19.
• Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. y O’Donoghe, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
• Füllbrunn, S., Rau, H. y Weitzel, U. (2014). Does ambiguity aversion survive in experimental asset markets? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107(b), 810-826.
• Furnham, A. y Boo, H. (2011). A literature review on the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35-42.
• Gatherwood, J. y Weber, J. (2014). Self-control, financial literacy and the co-holding puzzle. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107(b), 455-469.
• Gennaioli, N. y Shleifer, A. (2010). What comes to mind. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1399-1433.
• Gettys, C., III, K. y Peterson, C. (1973). The best-guess hypothesis in multistage inference. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10(3), 364-373.
• Gianneti, M. y Yafeh, Y. (2012). Do cultural differences between contracting parties matter? Evidence from syndicated bank loans. Management Science, 58(2), 365-383.
• Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond ‘heuristics and biases’. Stroebe y Hewstone, M, (edits.), European Review of Social Psychology. Wiley.
• Gigerenzer, G. y Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650-669.
• Gigerenzer, G. y Goldstein, D. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press.
• Gigerenzer, G. y Goldstein, D. (2011). The recognition heuristic: A decade of research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(1), 100-121.
• Gigerenzer, G. y Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62, 451-482, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722019
• Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U. y Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506–528.
• Gilbert, P., Price, J. y Allan, S. (1995). Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: How might they be related? New Ideas in Psychology, 13(2), 149-165.
• Gilovich, T. y Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and now. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. y Kahneman, D. (edits.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press.
• Gneezy, U., Kapteyn, A. y Potters, J. (2003). Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. Journal of Finance, 58(2), 821–837.
• Goldstein, D. y Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. Simple heuristics that make us smart, (pp. 37–58). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Goldstein, D. y Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(4), 75–90.
• Grieco, D. y Hogarth, R. (2009). Overconfidence in absolute and relative performance: The regression hypothesis and Bayesian updating. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 756-771.
• Griffin, D. y Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 411-435.
• Griffin, D. y Brenner, L. (2004). Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. Koehler, D. y Harvey, N. (edits.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, pp. 177-199. Wiley.
• Griffin, D., Gonzalez, R. Koehler, D. y Gilovich, T. (2012), Judgmental heuristics: A historical overview. Holyoak, K. y Morrison, R. (edits.). The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, (pp. 322-345). Oxford University Press.
• Griffith, R. (1949). Odds adjustments by American horse-race bettors. The American Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 290-294.
• Grinblatt, M. y Keloharju, M. (2009). Sensation seeking, overconfidence and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 549-578.
• Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. y Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48.
• Gurevich, G., Kliger, D. y Weiner, B. (2012). The role of attribution of causality in economic decision making. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 439-444.
• Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. y Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367-388.
• Haack, P., Pfarrer, M. y Scherer, A. (2014). Legitimacy-as-feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 634-666.
• Haisley, E., Mostafa, R. y Loewenstein, G. (2008). Myopic risk-seeking: The impact of narrow decision bracketing on lottery play. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(1), 57-75.
• Hansen, P., Hendricks, V. y Rendsvig, R. (2013). Infostorms. Metaphilosophy, 44(3), 301-326.
• Hardin, A. y Looney, A. (2012). Myopic loss aversion: Demystifying the key factors influencing decision problem framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 311-331.
• Heath, C., Larrick, R. y Klayman, J. (1998). Cognitive repairs: How organizational practices can compensate for individual shortcomings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 1-37.
• Heffetz, O. y Frank, R. (2011). Preferences for status: Evidence and economic implications. Benhabib, J. Bisin, A. y Jackson, M. (edits.), Handbook of social economics, (pp. 69–91). North-Holland,
• Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. Harper & Row.
• Hendricks, D., Patel, J. y Zeckhauser, R. (1993). Hot hands in mutual funds: Short-run persistence of relative performance, 1974-1988. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 93-130.
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Gintis, H., McElreath, R. y Fehr, E. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-79.
• Hens, T. y Bachmann, K. (2008). Behavioral finance for private banking. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hirshleifer, D. (2001). Investor psychology and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533-97.
• Hirshleifer, D. (2008). Psychological bias as a driver of financial regulation. European Financial Management, 14(5), 856-874.
• Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7(7), 133-159.
• Hirshleifer, D. y Teoh, S. (2003). Limited attention, information disclosure and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1), 337-386.
• Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K. y Teoh, S. (2012). The accrual anomaly: Risk or mispricing. Management Science, 58(2), 320-335.
• Hodges, S., Tompkins, R. y Ziemba, W. (2008). The favorite longshot bias in S&P 500 and FTSE 100 Index futures options: The return to bets and the cost of insurance. Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets. Elsevier.
• Hoff, K. y Stiglitz, J. (2010). Equilibrium fictions: A cognitive approach to societal rigidity. American Economic Review, 100(2), 141-146.
• Hoff, K. y Priyanka, P. (2004). Belief systems and durable inequalities: An experimental investigation of Indian caste. World Bank Working Paper 3351.
• Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R. y Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(3), 566-581.
• Hoppe, E. y Kusterer, J. (2011). Behavioral biases and cognitive reflection. Economic Letters, 110 (2), 97-100.
• Hossain, T. y List, J. (2012). The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Science, 58(12), 2151-2167.
• Hu, Y. y Li, X. (2011). Context-dependent product evaluations: An empirical analysis of internet book reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(3), 123-133.
• Huber, J., Payne, J. y Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90–98.
• Huber, J., Kirchler, M. y Stöckl, T. (2010). The hot hand belief and the gambler’s fallacy in investment decisions under risk. Theory and Decision, 68(4), 445-462.
• Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity breeds investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 659-680.
• Ilomäki, J. (2012). Framed field experiment with stock market professionals. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13(4), 251-258.
• Jacobsen, B., Lee, J. Marquering, W. y Zhang, C. (2014). Gender differences in optimism and asset allocation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107(b), 630-651.
• Janis, I. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin.
• Jaspersen, J. y Aseervatham, V. (2015). The influence of affect on heuristic thinking in insurance demand. The Journal of Risk and Insurance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12088
• Ji, L., Nisbett, R. y Su, Y. (2001). Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science, 12(6), 450–456.
• Kahneman, D. (2003a). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-75.
• Kahneman, D. (2003b). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
• Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
• Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
• Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. (edits.). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
• Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582-591.
• Kahneman, D. y Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31.
• Kahneman, D. y Riepe, M. (1998). Aspects of investor psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-65.
• Kahneman, D. y Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. y Kahneman, D. (edits.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought, (pp. 49-81). Cambridge University Press.
• Kahneman, D. y Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. Holyoake, KJ y Morrison, R. (edits.). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. y Thaler, R. (1986a). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. y Thaler, R. (1986b). Fairness and the assumptions of Economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), S285-S300.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. y Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325-48.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. y Thaler, R. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Katona, G. (1901). Psychological Economics. Elsevier (1975).
• Kirby, K. y Herrnstein, R. (1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychology Science, 6(2), 83-89.
• Knetsch, J. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 1277-84.
• Koch, A. y Nafzinger, J. (2016). Goals and bracketing under mental accounting. Journal of Economic Theory, 162(c), 305-361.
• Koop, G. y Johnson, J. (2012). The use of multiple reference points in risky decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 49-62.
• Kõszegi, B. y Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133-65.
• Kõszegi, B. y Rabin, M. (2007). Reference-dependent risk attitudes. The American Economic Review, 97(4), 1047-73.
• Kumar, A. y Lim, S. (2008). How do decision frames influence the stock investment decisions of individual investors? Management Science, 54(6), 1052–1064.
• Kuran, T. y Sunstein, C. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 51(4), 683–768.
• Lacetera, N., Pope, D. y Sydnor, J. (2014). Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2206-2236.
• Lahvicka, J. (2014). What causes the favourite-longshot bias? Further evidence from tennis. Applied Economic Letters, 21(2), 90-92.
• Landman, J. y Manis, M. (1983). Social cognition: Some historical and theoretical perspectives. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 49-123.
• Langer, E. (1975). The illusion of control. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311-328.
• Langer, T. y Weber, M. (2005). Myopic prospect theory vs. myopic loss aversion: How general is the phenomenon? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(1), 25-38.
• Lee, C. y Andrade, E. (2011). Fear, social projection, and financial decision making. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, S121-S129.
• Lejarraga, T. y Gonzalez, C. (2011). Effects of feedback and complexity on repeated decisions from description. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 286-295.
• Levinson, J. y Peng, K. (2007). Valuing cultural differences in Behavioral Economics. The ICFAI Journal of Behavioral Finance, 4(1), 32-47.
• Libby, R. y Rennekamp, K. (2012). Self-serving attribution bias, overconfidence, and the issuance of management forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(1), 197-231
• Liberali, J., Reyna, V., Furlan, S., Stein, L. y Pardo, S. (2012). Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), 361-381.
• Lichtenstein, S. y Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159-183.
• List, J. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115(3), 482-493.
• Liu, H. y Colman, A. (2009). Ambiguity aversion in the long run: Repeated decisions under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 277-284.
• Liu, Y., Huang, Y., Luo, Y. y Zhao, Y. (2014). How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance? Journal of Operations Management, 30, 355-367.
• Lo, A., Repin, D. y Steenbarger, B. (2005). Fear and greed in financial markets: A clinical study of day-traders. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 352-359.
• Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272-292.
• Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, C. y Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-86.
• Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. y Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1209-48.
• Lord, C., Ross, L. y Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098-2109.
• Lovallo, D. y Kahneman, D. (2003). Delusions of success: How optimism undermines executives’ decisions. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 56-63.
• Lundeberg, M., Fox, P. y Punccohar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.
• Lunenburg, F. (2010). Group decision making: The potential for groupthink. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 13(1), 1-6.
• Malmendier, U. y Tate, G. (2005a). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700.
• Malmendier, U. y Tate, G. (2005b). Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO Overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5), 649-659.
• Manski, C. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 115-136.
• Marewski, J., Gaissmaier, W. y Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Good judgments do not require complex cognition. Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 103-121.
• Mayo-Wilson, C., Zollman, K. y Danks, D. (2012). Wisdom of crowds versus groupthink: learning in groups and in isolation. International Journal of Game Theory, 42(3), 695-723.
• McGraw, A., Larsen, J., Kahneman, D. y Schkade, D. (2010). Comparing gains and losses, Psychological Science, 21(10), 1438-45.
• Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378.
• Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. HarperCollins.
• Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961-978.
• Moore, D. y Healy, P. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517
• Mullainathan, S. y Thaler, R. (2000). Behavioral Economics. MIT Dept. of Economics Working Paper No. 00-27. http://ssrn.com/abstract=245828
• Nguyen, B. y Klaus, P. (2013). Retail fairness: Exploring consumer perceptions of fairness towards retailers’ marketing tactics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3), 311-324.
• Nisbett, R. y Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100(19), 11163-70.
• Nofsinger, J. (2012). Household behavior and boom/bust cycles. Journal of Financial Stability, 8(3), 161-173.
• Novemsky, N. y Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128.
• Odean, T. (1998a). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-98.
• Odean, T. (1998b), Volume, volatility, price and profit when all traders are above average. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1887-1934.
• Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? The American Economic Review, 89(5), 1279-1298.
• Oechssler, J., Roider, A. y Schmitz, P. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 147-152.
• Okun, A. (1981). Prices and quantities: A macro-economic analysis. The Brookings Institution.
• Oppenheimer, D., Leboeuf, R. y Brewer, N. (2008). Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition, 106(1), 13-26.
• Ortmann, A., Gigerenzer, G., Borges, B. y Goldstein, D. (2008). The recognition heuristic: A fast and frugal way to investment choice? Plott, C. y Smith, V. (edits.). Handbook of experimental economics results: vol 1, (pp. 993–1003). Handbooks in Economics 28.
• Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. The Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(3), 261-265.
• Ottaviani, M. y Sorensen, P. (2007). The favorite-longshot bias: An overview of the main explanations. Hausch, D. y Ziemba, W. (edits.). Efficiency of Sports and Betting Markets. Elsevier: Handbook in Finance Series.
• Pacheco, J. (2012). The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion on the diffusion of antismoking legislation across the American States. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 187-202.
• Pachur, T. y Galesic, M. (2013). Strategy selection in risky choice: The impact of numeracy, affect, and cross-cultural differences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 260-271.
• Page, L. y Clemen, R. (2013). Do prediction markets produce well-calibrated probability forecasts? The Economic Journal, 123(568), 491-513.
• Pan, C. y Statman, M. (2010). Beyond risk tolerance: Regret, overconfidence and other investor propensities. SCU Leavey School of Business, Research Paper No. 10-05.
• Pennycook, G. y Thompson, V. (2012). Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 528-534.
• Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. y Thompson, V. (2014). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 40(2), 544-554.
• Peón, D., Antelo, M. y Calvo, A. (2015). A dynamic behavioral model of the credit boom. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(4), 1077-99.
• Phelps, E. y Pollak, R. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 185-199.
• Plous, S. (1991). Biases in the assimilation of technological breakdowns: Do accidents make us safer? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 221(13), 1058-82.
• Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill.
• Polman, E. (2012). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141-150.
• Pool, V., Stoffman, N. y Yonker, S. (2012). No place like home: Familiarity in mutual fund manager portfolio choice. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2563-99.
• Prendergast, C. y Stole, L. (1996). Impetuous youngsters and jaded old-timers: Acquiring a reputation for learning. Journal of Political Economy, 104(6), 1105–34.
• Presson, P. y Benassi, V. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(3), 493-510.
• Prince, M. (1993). Women, men, and money stiles. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(1), 175-182.
• Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11-46.
• Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281-92.
• Rabin, M. (2002a). A perspective on Psychology and Economics. European Economic Review, 46(4-5), 657-685.
• Rabin, M. (2002b). Inference by believers in the Law of Small Numbers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 775-816.
• Rabin, M. y Vayanos, D. (2010). The gambler’s and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 730-778.
• Rabin, M. y Schrag, J. (1999). First impressions matter: A model of confirmatory bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 37-82.
• Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L., Grewal, D. y Hughes, D. (2013). Understanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 547-566.
• Read, D., Loewenstein, G. y Rabin, M. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1-3), 171-197.
• Ricciardi, V. y Simon, H. (2000). What is Behavioral Finance? Business, Education & Technology Journal, 2(2), 1-9.
• Richins, M. (1991). Comparison and the idealized images of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 71-83.
• Rieger, M. (2012). Why do investors buy bad financial products? Probability misestimation and preferences in financial investment decision. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13(2), 108-118.
• Roca, M., Hogarth, R. y Maule, J. (2006). Ambiguity seeking as a result of the status quo bias. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32(3), 175-194.
• Roese, N. y Vohs, K. (2012). Hindsight bias. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 411-426.
• Roll, R. (1986), The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers, Journal of Business 59(2), 197-216.
• Rooderkerk, R., van Heerde, H. y Bijmolt, T. (2011). Incorporating context effects into a choice model. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 767-780.
• Ross, M. y Sicoly, F. (1977). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Rubin, J. (2014). Centralized institutions and cascades. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(2), 340-357.
• Sahi, S., Arora, A. y Dhameja, N. (2013). An exploratory inquiry into the psychological biases in financial investment behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 94-103.
• Salovey, P. y Rodin, J. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 780-792.
• Samuelson, W. y Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59.
• Scheinkman, J. y Xiong, W. (2003). Overconfidence and speculative bubbles. Journal of Political Economy, 111(6), 1183-1219.
• Schlüter, A. y Vollan, B. (2015). Flowers and an honour box: Evidence on framing effects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 186-199.
• Schmidt, U. y Zank, H. (2012). A genuine foundation for prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 45(2), 97-113.
• Scholten, M. y Read, D. (2006). Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Science, 52(9), 1424-36.
• Schooler, L. y Hertwig, R. (2005). How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review, 112(3), 610-628.
• Schwager, S. y Rothermund, K. (2013). Motivation and affective processing biases in risky decision making: A counter-regulation account. Journal of Economic Psychology, 38, 111-126.
• Schwikert, S. y Curran, T. (2014). Familiarity and recollection in heuristic decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143(6), 2341-65.
• Seiler, M., Seiler, V., Harrison, D. y Lake, M. (2013). Familiarity bias and perceived future home price movements. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(1), 9-24.
• Sen, A. (1995). Moral codes and economic success. Brittan, C. y Hamlin, A. (edits.) Market Capitalism and Moral Values. Aldershot.
• Shafir, E. y Thaler, R. (2006). Invest now, drink later, spend never: The mental accounting of delayed consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(5), 694-712.
• Shefrin, H. (2000). Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. (Segunda edición). Oxford University Press.
• Shefrin, H. (2006). Behavioral Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill.
• Shefrin, H. y Cervellati, E. (2011). BP’s failure to debias: Underscoring the importance of behavioral corporate finance. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1(1), 127-168.
• Shefrin, H. y Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790.
• Shefrin, H. y Statman, M. (2000). Behavioral portfolio theory. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2), 127-151.
• Sherif, M. (1937). An experimental approach to the study of attitudes. Sociometry 1, 90-98.
• Shiller, R. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Fall: 457-498.
• Shiller, R. (2000a). Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system. Taylor, B. y Woodfood, M. (edits.). Handbook of Macroeconomics. North Holland.
• Shiller, R. (2000b). Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press.
• Shiller, R. (2003). From efficient market theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83-104.
• Shin, H. (1992). Prices of state contingent claims with insider traders, and the favorite-longshot bias. The Economic Journal, 102(411), 426-435.
• Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford University Press.
• Shleifer, A. (2004). Does competition destroy ethical behavior? American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 94(2), 414-418.
• Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational. Wiley.
• Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158–74.
• Simonson, I. y Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 281-295.
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E. y MacGregor, D. (2002). The affect heuristic. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. y Kahneman, D. (edits.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, (pp. 387-420). Cambridge University Press.
• Solow, R. (1980). On theories of unemployment. American Economic, Review, 70(1), 1-11.
• Statman, M. (1999). Behavioral finance: Past battles, future engagements. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6), 18-27.
• Statman, M. y Weng, J. (2010). Investment across cultures: Financial Attitudes of Chinese-Americans. Journal of Investment Consulting, 11(1), 37-44.
• Statman, M., Thorley, S. y Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor overconfidence and trading volume. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1531-65.
• Stevens, J. (2016). Intertemporal similarity: Discounting as a last resort. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(1), 12-24.
• Stöckl, T., Huber, J., Kirchler, M. y Lindner, F. (2015). Hot hand and gambler’s fallacy in teams: Evidence from investment experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117(11), 327-339.
• Strotz, R. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165-180.
• Stulz, R. y Williamson, R. (2003). Culture, openness, and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3), 313-349.
• Suetens, S. y Tyran, J. (2012). The gambler’s fallacy and gender. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 118-124.
• Sul, S., Kim, J. y Choi, I. (2013). Subjective well-being and hedonic editing: How happy people maximize joint outcomes of loss and gain. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1409-1430.
• Taylor, M. y Wilson, S. (2012). Does culture still matter? The effects of individualism on national innovation rates. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 234-247.
• Taylor, S. (1982). The availability bias in social perception and interaction. Kahneman, D. Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Thaler, R. (1983). Illusions and mirages in public policy. Public Interest, 73, 60-74.
• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
• Thaler, R. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206.
• Thaler, R. (2008). Mental accounting and consumer choice: Anatomy of a failure. Marketing Science, 27(1), 12-14.
• Thaler, R. y Johnson, E. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643-660.
• Thaler, R. y Shefrin, H. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392-406.
• Thaler, R., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. y Schwartz, A. (1997). The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk: Taking an experimental test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 646-661.
• Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
• Troye, S. y Supphellen, M. (2012). Consumer participation in coproduction: “I made it myself” effects on consumers’ sensory perceptions and evaluations of outcome and input product. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 33-46.
• Tsetsos, K., Chater, N. y Usher, M. (2012). Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(24), 9659-64.
• Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–99.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1971). The belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105-110.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology 5(2), 207-232.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-31.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1982a). Evidential impact of base rates. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1982b). Judgments of and by representativeness. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1983). Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293-315.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(S4), S251-S278.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039-61.
• Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
• Tversky, A. y Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179-89.
• Aral, S. y Walker, D. (2014). Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Science 60(6), 1352-70.
• Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M. y Rutström, E. (2014). Discounting behavior: A reconsideration, European Economic Review, 71, 15-33.
• Weber, M. (1905). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Routledge Classic.
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.
• Williams, E. y Gilovich, T. (2008). Do people really believe they are above average? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1121-28.
• Wu, J. (2015). Helpful laymen in informational cascades. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116(c), 407-415.
• Zeisberger, S., Vrecko, D. y Langer, T. (2015). Measuring time stability of prospect theory preferences. Theory and Decision, 72(3), 359-386.
• Zhang, X.-J. (2013). Book-to-Market ratio and skewness of stock returns. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2213-40