Propuestas para garantizar modalidades de consumo y producción sostenibles (ODS 12)

  1. Mónica García Goldar 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Revista de fomento social

ISSN: 0015-6043,  2695-6462

Ano de publicación: 2021

Número: 299

Páxinas: 91-114

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.32418/RFS.2021.299.4582 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de fomento social

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

This work takes the current social context (overconsumption, programmed ob-solescence, etc.) as a starting point in order to illustrate the lack of focus on sustainability reflected in certain European legal standards; a fact that contrasts with the approval by European institutions of two action plans for the circular economy (in 2015 and 2020) that were not reflected in the recent Direc-tive 2019/771, May 20th, which regulates certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods. Fortunately, and despite the fact that this Directive is geared toward max-imum harmonisation, member countries will retain a certain margin for manoeuvre that will allow them to establish longer liability periods, which is desirable. Lastly, we will contemplate the possibility of the market moving towards circularity, as demand for sustainable products is growing

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BAUMAN, Z. (2006). Vida líquida. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • CLAEYS, I. & VANCOILLIE, J. (2017). “Remedies, modification of digital content and right to terminate long–term digital content contracts”. En I. CLAEYS & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Digital content & distance sales: new developments at EU level. Cambridge: Intersentia, 167–232.
  • DE BOECK, A. (2019). “The ‘Circular Economy’ – National Legal Initiatives and Challenges Converning Movables – Belgium”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 185–199.
  • HOBSON, K. (2013). “Weak or strong sustainable consumption? Efficiency, degrowth, and the 10 Year Framework of Programmes”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 1082–1098.
  • HOWELLS, G., TWIGG–FLESNER, C. & WILHELMSSON, T. (2018). “Regulation of unfair commercial practices”. En Rethinking EU Consumer Law. Oxon–New York: Routledge, 46–93.
  • KEIRSBILCK, B. & ROUSSEAU, S. (2019). “The Marketing Stage: Fostering Sustainble Consumption Choices in a Circular and Functional Economy”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 93–126.
  • LIBAERT, T. & HABER, J. P. (2013). Por un consumo más sostenible: la duración de la vida de los productos industriales y la información al consumidor para recuperar la confianza: la duración de la vida de los productos industriales y la información al consumidor para recuperar la confianza. Bruselas: Dictamen del Comité Económico y Social.
  • LOOS, M. B. M. (2017). “Not good but certainly content: The proposals for European Harmonisation of Online and Distance Selling of Goods and the Supply of Digital Content”. En I. CLAEYS & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Digital content & distance sales: new developments at EU level. Cambridge: Intersentia, 3–53.
  • MAITRE–EKERN, E. & DALHAMMAR, C. (2019). “A Scandinavian Perspective on the Role of Consumers in the Circular Economy”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 201–223.
  • MAK, V. & LUJINOVIC, E. (2019). “Towards a Circular Economy in EU Consumer Markets. Legal Possibilities and Legal Challenges and the Dutch Example”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 161–183.
  • MAK, V. & TERRYN, E. (2020). “Circular Economy and Consumer Protection: The Consumer as a Citizen and the Limits of Empowerment Through Consumer Law”. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43, 227–248.
  • MAK, V. (2016). The new proposal for harmonised rules on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content”. Brussels: Directorate General for Internal Policies, European Parliament.
  • MA KO, R. (2017). Towards new rules on sales and digital content: Analysis of the key issues”. Brussels: European parliamentary Research Service.
  • MAZEIKA, R. (2019). “Consumer Protection in the Circular Economy in Europe – Legal Initiatives and Challenges – The Commission’s View”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 11–18.
  • MESACASA, A, CORONA, H. M. P. & MELLO, N. A. (2010). “Ecodesign: um Novo Paradigma Moderno Inscrito entre Moda e Consumo?”. Design & Tecnologia, 1(2), 1–7.
  • MICKLITZ, H.–W. (2019). “Squaring the Circle? Reconciling Consumer Law and the Circular Economy”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 323–345.
  • MORAIS CARVALHO, J. (2019). “Venda de bens de consume e fornecimento de conteúdos e serviços digitais – as Diretivas 2019/771 e 2019/770 e o seu impacto no Direito portugués”. Revista electrónica de Direito, 20 (3), 63–87.
  • NASCIMENTO PEREIRA, M. (2017). “Consumo sustentável: a problemática da obsolescência programada e o descarte de produtos”. Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade, 5 (2), 209–220.
  • NORMA MARTÍNEZ, A. y MARGARITA PORCELLI, A. (2016). “Un difícil camino en pos del consumo sustentable: el dilema entre la obsolescencia programada, la tecnología y el ambiente”. Lex: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencia Política de la Universidad Alas Peruanas, 14 (18), 333–378.
  • PANTZAR, M. & SULJADA, T. (2020). Delivering a circular economy within the planet’s boundaries: An analysis of the new EU Circular Economy Action Plan. Brussels and Stockholm: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) and Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI).
  • PAZOS, R. (2020). “Sustainability, the Circular Economy and Consumer Law in Spain”. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 5, 212–215.
  • RIBEIRO FREYESLEBEN, L. E. y MAAS DOS ANJOS, R. (2018). “Circularidad en tiempos obsoletos”. En J. MELGAREJO MORENO (Ed.) Congreso Nacional del Agua Orihuela: Innovación y Sostenibilidad. Alicante: Universitat d’Alacant, 819–830.
  • SANTAMARÍA ARINAS, R. J. (2019). “Economía circular: líneas maestras de un concepto jurídico en construcción”. Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, 10 (1), 1–37.
  • SCHALLY, H. M. (2019). “The Circular Economy Action Plan: An Agenda for Change”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 3–9.
  • SOTO PINEDA, J. A. (2015). “Reflexiones acerca de las posibles incompatibilidades de la obsolescencia programada con el sistema de defensa de los consumidores”. Actualidad civil, 6, 40–55.
  • STRAETMANS, G. & MEYS, S. (2017). “The new proposals for directives concerning digital content and online/distance sales”. En I. CLAEYS & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Digital content & distance sales: new developments at EU level. Cambridge: Intersentia, 307–361.
  • TERRYN, E. (2019). “A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law”. En B. KEIRSBILCK & E. TERRYN (Eds.) Consumer Protection in a Circular Economy. Cambridge: Intersentia, 127–147.
  • TONNER, K. & MALCOLM, R. (2017). How an EU Lifespan guarantee Model Could Be Implemented Across the European Union. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • VIDALENC, E. y MEUNIER, L. (2014). “Obsolescence des produits: l’impact écologique”. Revue Futuribles, 402, 5–21.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet