Sex differences in adolescent bullying behaviours

  1. Sandra S Feijóo
  2. James O’Higgins-Norman
  3. Mairéad Foody
  4. Rafael Pichel
  5. Teresa Braña
  6. Jesús Varela
  7. Antonio Rial
Revista:
Psychosocial Intervention

ISSN: 1132-0559

Ano de publicación: 2021

Título do exemplar: Bullying and Cyberbullying

Volume: 30

Número: 2

Páxinas: 95-100

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5093/PI2021A1 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Psychosocial Intervention

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

RESUMEN En las últimas décadas ha ido creciendo la preocupación por las agresiones entre iguales y su investigación, tanto en el propio entorno escolar como, más recientemente, a través de la red. El presente estudio se planteó con el objetivo de explorar las diferencias de sexo tanto en el acoso tradicional como en el ciberacoso, pues la bibliografía existente no llega a un consenso sobre la forma en que la implicación en el acoso puede estar siendo moderada por el sexo o el género. La muestra constó de 3,174 adolescentes de 12 a 17 años que cumplimentaron por escrito una encuesta que incluía el European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire y el European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Los principales resultados no mostraron diferencias en las tasas de ciberacoso de chicas y chicos. Respecto al acoso tradicional, aunque se han hallado más víctimas-agresoras en los chicos, no se han encontrado diferencias en la tasa de víctimas y agresores puros. Al analizar las conductas específicas sufridas o perpetradas, se encontraron varias diferencias entre chicas y chicos. Sin embargo, esas diferencias eran pequeñas y no parece que haya un patrón de acoso claramente diferenciado, lo que desaconseja emplear estrategias preventivas claramente diferenciadas para chicas y para chicos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Athanasiou, K,Melegkovits, E,Andrie, E. K,Magoulas, C,Tzavara, C. K,Richardson, C,Greydanus, D,Tsolia, M,Tsitsika, A. K.. (2018). Cross-national aspects of cyberbullying victimization among 14-17-year-old adolescents across seven European countries. BMC Public Health. 18. 800
  • Bauman, S,Del Rio, A.. (2006). Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology. 98. 219
  • Byrne, B. M.. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
  • Carrera-Fernández, M. V,Lameiras-Fernández, M,Rodríguez-Castro, Y.. (2016). Performing intelligible genders through violence: Bullying as gender practice and heteronormative control. Gender and Education. 30. 341
  • Chocarro, E,Garaigordobil, M.. (2019). Bullying y cyberbullying: diferencias de sexo en víctimas, agresores y observadores [Bullying and cyberbullying: gender differences in victims, aggressors and observers]. Pensamiento Psicológico. 17. 57-71
  • Coen, S,Banister, E.. (2012). What a difference sex and gender make: A gender, sex and health research casebook. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
  • Del Rey, R,Casas, J. A,Ortega-Ruiz, R,Schultze-Krumbholz, A,Scheithauer, H,Smith, P,Thompson, F,Barkoukisf, V,Tsorbatzoudisf, H,Brighig, A,Guarinig, A,Pyzalski, J,Plichta, P.. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior. 50. 141
  • Del Rey, R,Lazuras, L,Casas, J. A,Barkoukis, V,Ortega-Ruiz, R,Tsorbatzoudis, H.. (2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship?. Learning and Individual Differences. 45. 275
  • Erdur-Baker, Ö.. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internetmediated communication tools. New Media & Society. 12. 109
  • Espelage, D. L,Mebane, S. E,Swearer, S. M.. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Foody, M,McGuire, L,Kuldas, S,O’Higgins-Norman, J.. (2019). Friendship quality and gender differences in association with cyberbullying involvement and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 17-23
  • Garaigordobil, M,Aliri, J.. (2013). Ciberacoso (“Cyberbullying”) en el País Vasco: diferencias de sexo en víctimas, agresores y observadores [Cyberbullying in the Basque Country: Gender differences in victims, perpetrators and observers]. Behavioral Psychology. 21. 461
  • Ging, D,O’Higgins Norman, J.. (2016). Cyberbullying, conflict management or just messing? Teenage girls’ understandings and experiences of gender, friendship, and conflict on Facebook in an Irish second-level school. Feminist Media Studies. 16. 805
  • Golpe, S,Gómez, P,Harris, S. K,Braña, T,Rial, A.. (2017). Diferencias de sexo en el uso de Internet en adolescentes españoles [Sex differences in Internet use among Spanish teenagers]. Behavioral Psychology. 25. 129
  • Görzig, A,Ólafsson, K.. (2013). What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five European countries. Journal of Children and Media. 7. 9-27
  • Hartung, C. M,Little, C. S,Allen, E. K,Page, M. C.. (2011). A psychometric comparison of two self-report measures of bullying and victimization: Differences by sex and grade. School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal. 3. 44-57
  • Heidari, S,Babor, T. F,De Castro, P,Tort, S,Curno, M.. (2016). Sex and gender equity in research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Research Integrity and Peer Review.
  • Hinduja, S,Patchin, J. W.. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior. 298. 129
  • Hinduja, S,Patchin, J. W.. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 42. 711
  • Inchley, J,Currie, D,Budisavljevic, S,Torsheim, T,Jåstad, J,Cosma, A,Kelly, C,Arnarsson, A. M,Samdal, O.. (2020). Spotlight on adolescent health and well-being. Findings from the 2017/2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Survey in Europe and Canada. International report. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  • Jöreskog, K. G,Sörbom, D.. (1989). LISREL 7 User’s reference guide.
  • Kasahara, G. M,Houlihan, D,Estrada, C.. (2019). Gender differences in social media use and cyberbullying in Belize: A preliminary report. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 11. 31
  • Kennedy, R. S.. (2020). Gender differences in outcomes of bullying prevention programs: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review. 119. 105-506
  • Kennedy, R. S.. (2020). A meta-analysis of the outcomes of bullying prevention programs on subtypes of traditional bullying victimization: Verbal, relational, and physical. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 55. 101-485
  • Kline, R. B.. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
  • Larrañaga, E,Navarro, R,Yubero, S.. (2018). Socio-cognitive and emotional factors on perpetration of cyberbullying. Comunicar. 26. 19-28
  • Lai, T,Kao, G.. (2018). Hit, robbed, and put down (but not bullied): Underreporting of bullying by minority and male students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 47. 619
  • Livingstone, S,Haddon, L,Görzig, A,Ólafsson, K.. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet. The perspective of European children: Full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year old and their parents in 25 countries. EU Kids Online Network.
  • Menesini, E,Nocentini, A,Camodeca, M.. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 31. 1-14
  • Menesini, E,Marcum, C. D,Higgins, G. E,Freiburger, T. L,Ricketts, M. L.. (2012). Battle of the sexes: An examination of male and female cyberbullying. International Journal of Cyber Criminology. 6. 904
  • O’Higgins Norman, J.. (2020). Tackling bullying from the inside out: Shifting paradigms in bullying research and interventions. International Journal of Bullying Prevention. 2. 161
  • (2019). OECD PISA 2018 results (volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. OECD Publishing.
  • Olweus, D.. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishers.
  • Olweus, D.. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon?. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 9. 520
  • Ortega-Ruiz, R,Del Rey, R,Casas, J. A.. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying: validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q [Assessing bullying and cyberbullying: Spanish validation of EBIP-Q and ECIP-Q]. Psicología Educativa. 22. 71
  • Romera, E. M,Del Rey, R,Ortega-Ruiz, R.. (2011). Factores asociados a la implicación en bullying: un estudio en Nicaragua [Factors associated with involvement in bullying: A study in Nicaragua]. Psychosocial Intervention. 20. 161
  • Rosen, N. L,Nofzige, S. (2019). Boys, bullying, and gender roles: How hegemonic masculinity shapes bullying behavior. Gender Issues. 36. 295-318
  • Ryoo, J. H,Wang, C,Swearer, S. M.. (2014). Examination of the change in latent statuses in bullying behaviors across time. School Psychology Quarterly. 30. 105
  • Silva, M. A,Pereira, B,Mendonça, D,Nunes, B,de Oliveira, W. A.. (2013). The involvement of girls and boys with bullying: An analysis of gender differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 10. 6820
  • Sittichai, R,Smith, P. K.. (2018). Bullying and cyberbullying in Thailand: Coping strategies and relation to age, gender, religion and victim status. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 7. 24-30
  • Slonje, R,Smith, P. K.. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 49. 147
  • Slonje, R,Smith, P. K,Frisén, A.. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior. 29. 26-32
  • Smith, P. K,López-Castro, L,Robinson, S,Görzig, A. (2019). Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 45. 33-40
  • Smith, P. K,Mahdavi, J,Carvalho, C,Fisher, S,Russell, S,Tippett, N.. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 49. 376
  • Sticca, F,Perren, S.. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 42. 739
  • (2019). UNESCO Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
  • (2017). UNICEF Child privacy in the age of web 2.0 and 3.0: Challenges and opportunities for policy. Innocenti Publications.
  • Wright, M. F.. (2020). The role of technologies, behaviors, gender, and gender stereotype traits in adolescents’ cyber aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 35. 1719
Fonte de datos: Dialnet