La expresión inmunohistoquímica intensa de ciclooxigenasa 2 se asocia inversamente con los valores máximos de SUV en la 18F-FDG-PET de pacientes afectados de carcinomas no microcíticos de pulmón. Relación con otros factores biológicos

  1. Alvaro Ruibal Morell
  2. Ihab Abdulkader Nallib
  3. Francisco Gude Sampedro
  4. María del Carmen Pombo Pasín
  5. Luis León Mateos
  6. Julio Barandela Salgado
  7. Aida Sánchez Salmón
Journal:
Revista española de medicina nuclear

ISSN: 0212-6982

Year of publication: 2009

Volume: 28

Issue: 1

Pages: 11-14

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S0212-6982(09)70209-5 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Revista española de medicina nuclear

Abstract

Objective: To study the expression of COX-2 and its possible relationship with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) in FDG-PET, and EGFR, p16 and MIB1 expression in patients with NSCLC. Material and method: 45 patients (12 adenocarcinomas and 33 squamous cell carcinomas) were included in this study; the immunohistochemical expression of COX-2, MIB-1, p16 and EGFR was determined using tissue-array. Each PET was performed 60 minutes after the i.v. administration of 350-518 MBq of FDG on an Advance system (GE) in 2D acquisition mode. Results: COX-2 expression was detected in 35 out of 45 cases, and was very significant (> ++) in 12 of them. SUV values were lower in the COX-2 > ++ cases that in the remaining cases (13.4 ± 1.2 vs. 12.9 vs. 17.1 ± 1.5; p = 0.059). COX-2 > ++ expression and maxSUV values were not correlated with the clinical stage. The expression of COX-2 > ++ was correlated positively with p16 (r = 0.36; p = 0.014) and negatively with MIB1 (r = -0.32; p = 0.041) expression, whereas the SUV was correlated positively with EGFR (r = 0.44; p = 0.004) and negatively with p16 (r = -0.29; p = 0.041) expression. Conclusions: Our results suggest that: a) the expression of COX-2 > ++ is often found in this kind of lung cancer and is not associated with the clinical stage; b) the maxSUVs were not related to the stage and were lower in COX-2 > ++ tumours than in the other cases; and c) the different behaviour of both parameters can be explained by their correlation with cell proliferation (MIB1), EGFR and p16 expression.