Documentary film mutations for social justiceIntroductory reflections

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aarseth, E. (1997), Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Aarseth, E. J. (1994), ‘Nonlinearity and literary theory’, in G. Landow (ed.), Hyper/Text/Theory, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 51–86.
• Anstey, E. and Elton, A. (1935), Housing Problems, UK: Kit Parker Films.
• Aston, J. (2017), ‘Interactive documentary and live performance: From embo- died to emplaced interaction’, in M. Rose, S. Gaudenzi and J. Aston (eds), The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, New York: Wallflower Columbia University Press, pp. 222–36.
• Aston, J. and Gaudenzi, S. (2012), ‘Interactive documentary: Setting the field’, Studies in Documentary Film, 6:2, pp. 125–39.
• Aston, J., Gaudenzi, S. and Rose, M. (2017), i-docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, New York: Columbia University Press.
• Aston, J. and Odorico, S. (2018),‘The poetics and politics of polyphony: Towards a research method for interactive documentary’, Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 15, pp. 63–93.
• Balló, T., Jiménez, M. and Torres, S. (2015), Las sinsombrero, https://bit. ly/2Fb4QWl. Accessed 9 May 2019.
• Block, M. (2017), We Are Chicago, Chicago: Culture Shock Games, https:// wearechicagogame.com. Accessed 53 June 2019.
• Bruzzi, S. (2006), New Documentary: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
• Chou, Y. K. (2015), ‘Octalysis: The complete gamification framework’, Yu-Kai Chou: Gamification & Behavioral Design, https://yukaichou.com/gamifica- tion-examples/octalysis-complete-gamification-framework/. Accessed 10 April 2019.
• Cizek, K. and Uricchio, W. (2019a), Collective Wisdom: Co-Creating Media with Communities, across Disciplines and with Algorithms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Open Documentary Lab.
• Cizek, K. and Uricchio, W. (2019b), Collective Wisdom: Executive Report, Cambridge, MA: MIT Open Documentary Lab, https://wip.mitpress.mit. edu/pub/collective-wisdom-exec-sum-biographies/release/3. Accessed 25 June 2019.
• Cortés-Selva, L. and Pérez-Escolar, M. (2016),‘Civic participation and interac- tive documentaries: A contribution to the open model government model’, El profesional de la información, 25:4, pp. 578–87.
• Cuadra, J. (2018), ‘Documentary Miguel Hernández 360o’, YouTube, MH360o (00:04:00), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=750Sg_heGBc and MH360o (00:08:00), http://createlevision.edu.umh.es/crea-tv-lab/. Accessed 15 June 2019.
• De la Peña, N. (2017),‘Towards behavioural realism: Experiments in immersive journalism’, in J. Aston, S. Gaudenzi and M. Rose (eds), i-docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 206–21.
• De la Peña, N., Weil, P., Llobera, J., Giannopoulos, E., Pomés, A., Spanlang, B., Friedman, D., Sanchez-Vives, M. V. and Slater, M. (2010), ‘Immersive jour- nalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19:4, pp. 291–301.
• Dore, M. (2014), She’s Beautiful When She’s Angry, https://bit.ly/2QfWIKr. Accessed 15 May 2019.
• Dovey, J. and Rose, M. (2012),‘This great mapping of ourselves: New documen- tary forms online’, in B. Winston (ed.), The BFI Companion to Documentary, London: BFI, pp. 366–75.
• Duerinck, F. (2018), Algorithmic Perfumery, interactive media and manufactu- ring installation.
• Fernández-Vara, C. (2019), Introduction to Game Analysis, NewYork: Routledge.
• Formenti, C. (2014),‘The sincerest form of docudrama: Re-framing the anima- ted documentary’, Studies in Documentary Film, 8:2, pp. 103–15.
• Gaudenzi, S. (2013), ‘The living documentary: From representing reality to co-creating reality in digital interactive documentary’, Ph.D. thesis, Goldsmiths: University of London.
• Gaylor, B. (2015), Do Not Track, Upian, https://donottrack-doc.com/en/. Accessed 5 June 2019.
• Gifreu, A. (2011), ‘The interactive multimedia documentary as a discourse on interactive non-fiction: For a proposal of the definition and categorisation of the emerging genre’, Hipertext.net, 9:9, n.pag.
• Grierson, J. (1933),‘The documentary producer’, Cinema Quarterly, 2:1, pp. 7–9.
• Gwaltney, J. (2016), ‘1979 Revolution: Black Friday: A compelling and unique historical thriller’, Game Informer, 1 June, https://www.gameinformer.com/ games/1979_revolution_black_friday/b/pc/archive/2016/06/01/a-compe- lling-and-unique-historical-thriller.aspx. Accessed 15 May 2019.
• Hallema, S. (2018), The Social Sorting Experiment, interactive theatre, the Netherlands: The Smartphone Orchestra.
• Hardee, G. M. (2016), ‘Immersive journalism in VR: Four theoretical doma- ins for researching a narrative design framework’, in S. Lackey and R. Shumaker (eds), Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9740, Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–14.
• Harris, J. and Kamvar, S. (2006), We Feel Fine, http://wefeelfine.org/. Accessed 10 June 2019.
• Honess Roe, A. (2013), Animated Documentary, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Husak, A. (2018), ‘Exercising radical democracy: The crisis of representation and interactive documentary as an agent of change’, Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 15 (Summer), pp. 16–32, www.alphavillejournal. com/Issue15/ArticleHusak.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2019.
• Khonsari, N. (2017), Blindfold: A Verité VR Experience, iNK Stories, http://inksto- ries.com. Accessed 5 June 2019.
• Levenson, N. (2019), Stealing Ur Feelings, Mozilla Foundation, https://stealin- gurfeelin.gs/. Accessed 20 June 2019.
• McNiff, S. (2008), ‘Art-based research’, in J. G. Knowles and A. L. Cole (eds), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues, New York: Sage Publishing, pp. 29–40.
• McRoberts, J. (2018), ‘Are we there yet? Media content and sense of presence in non-fiction virtual reality’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 101–18.
• Miller, L. and Allor, M. (2016), ‘Choreographies of collaboration: Social enga- gement in interactive documentaries’, Studies in Documentary Film, 10:1, pp. 53–70.
• Nash, K. (2012),‘Modes of interactivity: Analysing the webdoc’, Media Culture & Society, 34:2, pp. 195–210.
• Nash, K. (2014), ‘What is interactivity for? The social dimension of web-docu- mentary participation’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 28:3, pp. 383–95.
• Nash, K. (2018), ‘Virtually real: Exploring VR documentary’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 97–100.
• Nash, K., Hight, C. and Summerhayes, C. (2014), New Documentary Ecologies, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Nichols, B. (2001), Introduction to Documentary, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Odorico, S. (2011),‘Documentary on the web between realism and interaction: A case study from zero, people rebuilding life after the emergency’, Studies in Documentary Film, 5:2&3, pp. 235–46.
• Odorico, S. (2015), ‘Between interactivity, reality and participation: The inte- ractive documentary form’, MEI Mediation and Information, 39, pp. 213–27.
• Reig Valera, C. (2018), ‘En la brecha’, https://bit.ly/2MPYZtF. Accessed 8 May 2019.
• Renov, M. (1993), ‘Toward a poetics of documentary’, in M. Renov (ed.), Theorizing Documentary, London: Routledge, p. 12–36.
• Rose, M. (2018), ‘The immersive turn: Hype and hope in the emergence of virtual reality as a nonfiction platform’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 132–49.
• Schleser, M. (2011), Mobile-Mentary: Mobile Documentaries in the Mediascape, Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
• Shin, D. and Biocca, F. (2018),‘Exploring immersive experience in journalism’, New Media & Society, 20:8, pp. 2800–23.
• Skoller, J. (2011), ‘Introduction to the Special Issue Making It (Un)real: Contemporary Theories and Practices in Documentary Animation’, Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6:3, pp. 207–14.
• Smaill, B. (2018),‘An ecocritical approach to documentary interactivity: Spatial technologies in a film studies frame’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:3, pp. 173–89.
• Ward, P. (2011), ‘Animating with facts: The performative process of documen- tary animation in the ten mark (2010)’, Animation, 6:3, pp. 293–305.
• Winston, B. (1988),‘The tradition of the victim in Griersonian documentary’, in A. Rosenthal (ed.), New Challenges for Documentary, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
• Winston, B., Vanstone, G. and Chi, W. (2017), The Act of Documenting: Documentary Film in the 21st Century, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Zimmermann, P. R. (2019), Documentary across Platforms: Reverse Engineering Media, Place, and Politics, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Zimmermann, P. R. and De Michiel, H. (2017), Open Space New Media Documentary: A Toolkit for Theory and Practice, New York: Routledge.