Descentralización y voto económico en España

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alesina, Alberto y Howard Rosenthal (1995): Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Anderson, Cameron A. (2006): «Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual-Level Analysis», American Journal of Political Science, 50: 449-463.
• Anderson, Cameron A. (2008): «Economic Voting, Multilevel Governance and Economic Voting in Canada», Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41: 329-354.
• Beck, Nathaniel y Jonathan N. Katz (1995): «What To Do (and not To Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data», American Political Science Review, 89: 634-647.
• Blais, André, Eva Anduiza y Aina Gallego (2011): «Decentralization and Turnout», Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Special issue on «The Economic and Political Consequences of decentralization», 29: 297-320.
• Cox, Gary W. (2000): «Coordination, Electoral», en Richard Rose (ed.), Encyclopedia of Elections, Londres: MacMillan.
• Cutler, Fred (2004): «Government Responsibility and Electoral Accountability in Federations», Publius. The Journal of Federalism, 34: 19-38.
• Chhibber, Pradeep y Ken Kollman (2004): The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States, Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Downs, William M. (1999): «Accountability Payoffs in Federal Systems? Competing Logics and Evidence From Europe's Newest Federation», Publius. The Journal of Federalism, 29: 87-110.
• Escobar-Lemmon, María (2003): «Political Support for Decentralization: An Analysis of the Colombian and Venezuelan Legislatures», American Journal of Political Science, 47: 683-697.
• Evans, Geoffrey y Robert Andersen (2006): «The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions», The Journal of Politics, 68: 194-207.
• Evans, Geoffrey y Mark Pickup (2010): «Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Consequences of Economic Perceptions in the 200-2004 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle», The Journal of Politics, 72: 1236-1251.
• Ferrara, Federico, Erik S. Herron y Misa Nishikawa (2005): Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and its Consequences, Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Fiorina, Morris P. (1996): Divided Government, Needham Heights, MA: Allyson and Bacon.
• Gélineau, François y Karen L. Remmer (2003): «Subnational Electoral Choice. Economic and Referendum Voting in Argentina, 1983-1999», Comparative Political Studies, 36: 801-821.
• Gélineau, François y Karen L. Remmer (2005): «Political Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: The Argentine Experience, 1983-2001», British Journal of Political Science, 36: 133-157.
• Golder, Matt (2006): «Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation», American Journal of Political Science, 50: 34-48.
• Gschwend, Thomas (2008): «Studying Contamination Effects in Multi-Level Systems of Governance: First Thoughts about Hypotheses and Research Design», en C. van der Eijk y H. Schmitt (eds.), The Multilevel Electoral Systems of the EU, Mannheim: CONNEX Report Series 04.
• Hix, Simon y Michael Marsh (2007): «Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections», The Journal of Politics, 69: 495-510.
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks y Arjan H. Schakel (2008): «Regional Authority in 42 Democracies, 1950-2006: A Measure and Five Hypotheses», Regional and Federal Studies, 18: 111-302.
• Inman, Robert P. y Daniel L. Rubinfeld (1997): «The Political Economy of Federalism», en D. Mueller (ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Khemani, Stuti (2001): «Decentralization and Accountability: Are Voters More Vigilant in Local than in National Elections?», Policy Research Working Paper 2557, Washington: The World Bank.
• Kiewiet, D. Roderick (2000): «Economic Retrospective Voting and Incentives for Policymaking», Electoral Studies, 19: 427-440.
• Lago Peñas, Ignacio y Santiago Lago Peñas (2001): «La influencia de los resultados económicos sobre el apoyo electoral de los gobiernos autonómicos. 1980-1997», Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 93: 165-179.
• Lago Peñas, Ignacio y Santiago Lago Peñas (2010): «Decentralization and Electoral Accountability », Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28: 318-344.
• Lago Peñas, Ignacio y Jorge Martínez-Vázquez (eds.) (2011): «The Political and Economic Consequences of Decentralization », Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Special issue on «The Economic and Political Consequences of Decentralization », 29.
• Lago Peñas, Santiago y Jorge Martínez-Vázquez (eds.) (2009): La Asignación de Impuestos a las CCAA: Desafíos y Oportunidades, Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
• León, Sandra (2007): The Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization. Bringing Politics to the Study of Intergovernmental Transfers, Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Autonomics.
• León, Sandra (2011): «Who is Responsible for What? Clarity of Responsibilities in Multilevel States: The Case of Spain», European Journal of Political Research, 50: 80-109.
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S. y Mary Stegmaier (2007): «Economic Models of Voting», en Russell J. Dalton y Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Marsh, Michael y Mark Franklin (1996): «The Foundations: Unanswered Questions from the Study of European Elections, 1979-1994», en Cees van der Eijk y Mark Franklin (eds.), Choosing Europe? The European 28 Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• O'Neill, Kathleen (2003): «Decentralization as a Political Strategy», Comparative Political Studies, 26: 1068-1091.
• Pallarés, Francesc y Michael Keating (2003): «Multilevel Electoral Competition: Regional Elections and Party System in Spain», European Urban and Regional Studies, 10 (3): 239-256.
• Pitkin, Hanna F. (1985): El concepto de representación, Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
• Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes y Bernard Manin (eds.) (1999): Democracy, Accountability and Representation, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
• Reif, Karlhienz y Hermann Schmitt (1980): «Nine Second-Order Elections. A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results», European Journal of Political Research, 8: 3-44.
• Rohrschneider, Robert y Nick Clark (2008): «Second-Order Elections versus First-Order Thinking: How Voters Perceive the Representation Process in a Multi-Layered System of Governance», en Cess van der Eijk y Hermann Schmitt (eds.), The Multilevel Electoral Systems of the EU, Mannheim: CONNEX Report Series 04.
• Rosema, Martin (2007): «Low Turnout: Threat to Democracy or Blessing in Disguise? Consequences of Citizens' Varying Tendencies to Vote», Electoral Studies, 26: 612-623.
• Rudolph, Thomas J. (2003a): «Institutional Context and the Assignment of Political Responsibility», Journal of Politics, 65: 190-215.
• Rudolph, Thomas J. (2003b): «Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions», American Journal of Political Science, 47: 698-713.
• Samuels, David (2000): «The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil», Journal of Politics, 62: 240-253.
• Samuels, David (2002): «Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior», Comparative Political Studies, 35: 461-483.
• Samuels, David (2003): Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
• Schmitt, Hermann (2005): «The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order?», West European Politics, 28 (3): 650.
• Weingast, Barry R. (1995): «The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-preserving federalism and Economic Development», Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 11: 1-31.