El otro bajo tierraReflexiones sobre identidad, alteridad y arqueología

Referencias bibliográficas

• ANDERSON, B. R. O. (1983): Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso. London.
• ATKINSON, J. A., BANKS, I., y O’SULLIVAN, J. (Eds.) (1996): Nationalism and Archaeology. Cruithne. Glasgow.
• BAÁR, M. (2010): Historians and Nationalism: East-Central Europe in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford University. Oxford-New York.
• BAUMANN, G. (2004): “Grammars of Identity/ Alterity: A Structural Approach”. En BAUMANN, G. y GINGRICH, A. (Eds.), Grammars of Identity/Alterity: A Structural Approach. Berghahn. Oxford: 18-50.
• BENTLEY, G. C. (1987): “Ethnicity and Practice”.Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29 (1): 24-55.
• BOURDIEU, P. (1984): Homo academicus. Minuit. Paris.
• BOURDIEU, P. (2007): El sentido práctico. Siglo XXI. Buenos Aires.
• BRATHER, S. (2002): “Ethnic Identities as Constructions of Archaeology: The Case of the Alamanni”. En GILLETT, A. (Ed.), On Barbarian Identity: Critical Approaches To Ethnicity In The Early Middle Ages. Brepols. Turnhout: 149-175.
• BRUBAKER, R. y COOPER, F. (2000): “Beyond ‘Identity’”. Theory And Society, 29: 1-47.
• BRÜCK, J. (2004): “Material Metaphors: The Relational Construction of Identity in Early Bronze Age Burials in Ireland and Britain”. Journal Of Social Archaeology, 4: 307-333.
• CARDETE, M. C. (2009): “Construcciones identitarias en el mundo antiguo: arqueología y fuentes literarias. El caso de la Sicilia griega”. Arqueología Espacial, 27: 29-45.
• CHAPMAN, J. (1994): “Destruction of a Common Heritage: the Archaeology of War in Croatia, Bosnia and Hercegovina”. Antiquity, 68 (258): 120-126.
• DIACHENKO, A. (2016): “Archaeology and the Nation Estate. The Case of Eastern Europe”. Archaeological Dialogues, 23 (1): 3-10.
• DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. (2007): A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford University. Oxford-New York.
• DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. y CHAMPION, T. C. (Eds.) (1996): Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. Westview. Boulder.
• DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. y LUCY, S. (2005): “Introduction”. En DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. et al. Archaeology of Identity: An Introduction. Rout-ledge. London: 1-12.
• DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. y SØRENSEN, M. L. S. (Eds.). (1998): Excavating Women: A History of Women in European Archaeology. Routledge. London.
• DIETLER, M. (1994): “«Our ancestors the Gauls»:archaeology, ethnic nationalism, and the manipulation of Celtic identity in modern Europe”. American Anthropologist, 96 (3): 584-605.
• DOBRES, M.-A. (2014): “Agency in Archaeological Theory”. En SMITH, C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer. New York: 59-66.
• DOBRES, M.-A. y ROBB, J. E. (2000): “Agency in Archaeology. Paradigm or Platitude?”. En DOBRES, M.-A. y ROBB, J. E. (Eds.), Agency In Archaeology. Routledge. London: 1-17.
• DORNAN, J. L. (2002): “Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future Directions”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 9 (4): 303-329.
• FABIAN, J. (1983): Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. Columbia University. New York.
• FERNÁNDEZ-GÖTZ, M. (2014): De la familia a la etnia. Protohistoria de la Galia Oriental. Real Academia de la Historia. Madrid.
• FISKESJÖ, M. (2010): “The Global Repatriation Debate and the New ‘Universal’ Museums”. En LYDON, J. y RIZVI, U. Z. (Eds.) Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Left Coast. Walnut Creek: 303-310.
• FLEMING, K. (2006): “The Use and Abuse of Antiquity: The Politics and Morality of Appropriation”. En MARTINDALE, C. y THOMAS, R. F. (Eds.): Classics and the Uses of Reception. Blackwell. Malden-Oxford-Carl-Blackwell. Malden-Oxford-Carlton: 125-137.
• FOUCAULT, M. (1969): L’archéologie du savoir. Gallimard. Paris.
• FOWLER, C. (2004): The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. Routledge. London.
• GALATY, M. L. y WATKINSON, C. (2004): Archaeology under dictatorship. Kluwer Academic-Plenum. New York.
• GARDNER, A. (2002): “Social Identity and the Duality of Structure in Late Roman-Period Britain”. Journal of Social Archaeology, 2 (3): 323-351.
• GARDNER, A. (2007): An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Left Coast. Walnut Creek.
• GARDNER, A. (2011): “Action and Structure in Interpretive Archaeologies”. En COCHRANE, E. E. y GARDNER, A. (Eds.), Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Left Coast. Walnut Creek: 63-82.
• GELL, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon. Oxford.
• GIDDENS, A. (1995): La constitución de la sociedad. Bases para la Teoría de la Estructuración. Amorrortu. Buenos Aires.
• GKIASTA, M. (2010): “Social Identities, Materiality and Connectivity in Early Bronze Age Crete”. En KNAPP, A. B. y VAN DOMMELEN, P. (Eds.), Material Connections in the Ancient Mediterranean. Mobility, Materiality, Identity. Routledge. London: 85-105.
• GLEASON, P. (1983): “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History”. The Journal of American History, 69 (4): 910-931
• GNECCO, C. (2008): “Discursos sobre el otro: pasos hacia una arqueología de la alteridad étnica”. Revista CS, 2: 101-129.
• GNECCO, C. (2012): “Arqueología multicultural. Notas intempestivas”. Complutum, 23 (2): 93-102.
• GNECCO, C. y AYALA, P. (Eds.) (2010): Pueblos indígenas y arqueología en América Latina. Universidad de los Andes. Bogotá.
• GONZÁLEZ MORALES, M. R. (1992): “Racines: la justification archéologique des origines régionales dans l’Espagne des Communautés autonomes”. En SHAY, T. y CLOTTES, J. (Eds.), The Limitations of Archaeological Knowledge. Marcel Otte- Université de Liège. Liège: 15-28.
• GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. (2014): “Malos nativos. Una crítica de las arqueologías indígenas y poscoloniales”. Revista de Arqueologia, 27 (2): 47-63.
• GOSDEN, C. (1994): Social Being and Time. Blackwell. Oxford.
• GOSDEN, C. (2004): Archaeology and Colonialism. Cambridge University. Cambridge-New York.
• GOSDEN, C. (2005): “What Do Objects Want?”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12 (3): 193-211.
• GOSDEN, C. y MARSHALL, Y. (1999): “The Cultural Biography of Objects.” World Archaeology, 31 (2): 169-178.
• HALE, H. E. (2004): “Explaining Ethnicity”. Comparative Political Studies, 37(4): 458-485.
• HALL, J. M. (1997): Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge University. Cambridge.
• HAMILAKIS, Y. (1996): “Through the Looking Glass: Archaeology, Nationalism and the Politics of Identity”. Antiquity, 70 (270): 975-978.
• HAMILAKIS, Y. (2007): “From Ethics to Politics”. En HAMILAKIS, Y. y DUKE, P. G. (Eds.), Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. Left Coast. Walnut Creek: 15-40.
• HAMILAKIS, Y. (2009): The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece. Oxford University. Oxford-New York.
• HAMILAKIS, Y. (2012): “Are We Postcolonial Yet? Tales from the battlefield”. Archaeologies, 8 (1): 67-76.
• HANDLER, R. (1994): “Is ‘Identity’ a Useful CrossCultural Concept?”. En GILLIS, J. R. (Ed.), Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton University. Princeton: 27-40.
• HANSEN, P. (2000): Europeans Only?: Essays on Identity Politics and the European Union. Umeå University. Umeå.
• HÄRKE, H. G. H. (2000): Archaeology, Ideology, and Society: The German Experience. P. Lang. Frankfurt-New York.
• HERNANDO, A. (2002): Arqueología de la identidad. Akal. Madrid.
• HINGLEY, R. (2000): Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. Routledge. London- New York.
• HOBSBAWM, E. J. y RANGER, T. O. (1992): The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University. Cambridge-New York.
• HODDER, I. (2000): “Agency and Individuals in Long-Term Processes”. En DOBRES M.-A. y ROBB, J. E. (Eds.), Agency in Archaeology. Routledge. London: 21-33.
• HÖGBERG, A. (2016): “To Renegotiate Heritage and Citizenship beyond Essentialism”. Archaeological Dialogues, 23 (1): 39-48.
• HOLTORF, C. (2009): “A European Perspective on Indigenous and Immigrant Archaeologies”. World Archaeology, 41 (4): 672-681.
• HOLTORF, C. (2015): “Archaeology and Cultural Memory”. En International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Se-cond Edition). Elsevier. Oxford: 881-884.
• HOSKINS, J. (2006): “Agency, Biography And Objects”. En TILLEY, C. et al. (Eds.), Handbook Of Material Culture. Sage. London: 74-84
• . INGOLD, T. (2007). “Materials against Materiality”. Archaeological Dialogues, 14: 1-16.
• JAMES, S. (1999): The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? University of Wisconsin. Madison.
• JENKINS, R. (2000): “The Limits of Identity: Ethnicity, Conflict, and Politics”. Sheffield Online Papers in Social Research, 2. [http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.71447! /file/2jenkins.pdf. Fecha deconsulta: 10/05/2016]
• JENKINS, R. (2004). Social Identity (Second Edition). Routledge. London.
• JIMÉNEZ CID, A. (e. p.): “El renacimiento del Sarasvatī. Historiografía nacionalista y reinvención del pasado en la India contemporánea”. En AGUILERA, T. et al . (Eds.), Discursos alternativos en la recepción de la Antigüedad. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid.
• JONES, S. (1997): The Archaeology of Ethnicity. Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. Routledge. London.
• KNAPP, A. B. (2010): “Beyond Agency: Identity and Individuals in Archaeology”. En STEADMAN, S. R.y ROSS, J. C. (Eds.), Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East: New Paths Forward. Equinox. Lon-don: 193-200.
• KNAPPETT, C. (2008): “The Neglected Networks of Material Agency: Artefacts, Pictures and Texts”. En KNAPPETT, C. y MALAFOURIS, L. (Eds.), Material Agency. Towards A Non-Anthropocentric Approach. Springer Us. Boston: 139-156.
• KOHL, P. L. (2008): “European Archaeology. An Inclusive or Exclusive Discipline?”. Archaeological Dialogues, 15 (Special Issue 1): 30-34.
• KOHL, P. L. y FAWCETT, C. P. (Eds.) (1995): Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge University. Cambridge-New York
• . KOPYTOFF, I. (1986): “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process”. En APPADURAI, A. (Ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspec tive. Cambridge University. Cambridge: 64-91.
• KROTZ, E. (1994): “Alteridad y pregunta antropológica”. Alteridades, 4 (8): 5-11.
• KUPER, A. (2003): “The Return of the Native”. Current Anthropology, 44 (3): 389-402.
• LAHIRI, N. (2000): “Archaeology and Identity in Colonial India”. Antiquity, 74 (285): 687-692.
• LATOUR, B. (2005): Reensamblar lo social. Una introducción a la Teoría del Actor-Red. Manantial. Buenos Aires.
• LYDON, J. y RIZVI, U. Z. (Eds.) (2010): Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Left Coast. Walnut Creek.
• MCGHEE, R. (2008): “Aboriginalism and the Problems of Indigenous Archaeology”. American Antiquity, 73 (4): 579-597.
• MESKELL, L. (2002): “The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology”. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31 (1): 279-301.
• MESKELL, L. (Ed.). (2005): Archaeologies of Materiality. Blackwell. Oxford.
• MESKELL, L. (2007): “Archaeologies of Identity”. En INSOLL, T. (Ed.), The Archaeology of Identities: A Reader. Routledge. London: 23-43.
• MITCHELL, T. (2001): “Making the Nation: The Politics of Heritage in Egypt”. En ALSAYYAD, N. (Ed.): Consuming Tradition, Manufacturing Heritage: Global Norms and Urban Forms in the Age of Tourism. Routledge. London-New York: 21-38.
• MORO, O. (2012): “La nueva historia de la arqueología: un balance crítico”. Complutum, 23, 177-190.
• QUIRKE, S. (2010): Hidden Hands: Egyptian Workforces in Petrie Excavation Archives 1880-1924. Duckworth. London.
• RAMÍREZ-GOICOECHEA, E. (2011). Etnicidad, identidad, interculturalidad. Teorías, conceptos y procesos de la relacionalidad grupal humana. Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces. Madrid.
• RAMOS, A. R. (1994): “The Hyperreal Indian”. Critique of Anthropology, 14 (2): 153-171.
• REID, D. M. (2002): Whose Pharaohs? Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. University of California. Berkeley.
• ROBB, J. (2010): “Beyond Agency”. World Archaeology, 42 (4): 493-520.
• ROWLANDS, M. (2007): “The Politics of Identity in Archaeology”. En INSOLL, T. (Ed.), The Archaeology of Identities: A Reader. Routle-Routledge. London: 59-71.
• RUBY, P. (2006): “Peuples, fictions? Ethnicité, identité ethnique et sociétés anciennes”. Revue des Études Anciennes, 108 (1): 25-60.
• SAID, E. W. (1979): Orientalism. Random House. New York.
• SHENNAN, S. (1989): “Introduction: Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity”. En SHENNAN, S. (Ed.): Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. Routledge. London: 1-32.
• SHORE, C. (2000): Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration. Routledge. London-New York.
• SMITH, A. T. (2001). “The Limitations of Doxa: Agency and Subjectivity from an Archaeological Point of View”. Journal of Social Archaeology, 1 (2): 155-171.
• SMITH, C. y BURKE, H. (2003): “In the spirit of the code”. En ZIMMERMAN, L. J.; VITELLI, K. D. y HOLLOWELL, J. J. (Eds.): Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Altamira-SAA. Walnut Creek: 177-197.
• SVANBERG, F. (2003): Decolonizing the Viking Age 1. Almqvist & Wiksell International. Stockholm.
• TARLOW, S. (2001): “Decoding Ethics”. Public Archaeology, 1 (4): 245-259.
• THOMAS, D. H. (2000): Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. Basic Books. New York.
• THOMAS, J. (2004). Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge. London.
• TILLEY, C. (2007): “Materiality in Materials”. Archaeological Dialogues, 14 (1): 16-20.
• TRIGGER, B. G. (1984): “Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist”. Man, 19 (3): 355-370.
• WHITTAKER, D. (2009): “Ethnic Discourses on the Frontiers of Roman Africa”. En DERKS, T. y ROYMANS, N. (Eds.), Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity: The Role of Power and Tradition. Amsterdam University. Amsterdam: 189-206.
• WINTER, T. (2015): “Heritage and Nationalism: An Unbreachable Couple?” En WATERTON, E. y WATSON, S. (Eds.): The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke: 331-345.
• WODAK, R. y BOUKALA, S. (2015): “European Identities and the Revival of Nationalism in the European Union: A Discourse-Historical Approach”. Journal of Language and Politics, 14 (1): 87-109.
• ŽIŽEK, S. (1998): “Multiculturalismo o la lógica cultural del capitalismo multinacional”. En JAMESON, F. y ŽIŽEK, S. (Eds.): Estudios culturales: reflexiones sobre el multiculturalismo. Paidós. Buenos Aires: 137-188.