Identidad y alteridad en un mundo en transformación.Un análisis de las relaciones entre China y Estados Unidos.

  1. Pintado Lobato, Montserrat
Revista:
Relaciones internacionales

ISSN: 1699-3950

Ano de publicación: 2015

Título do exemplar: La alteridad en las Relaciones Internacionales

Número: 29

Páxinas: 91-110

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Relaciones internacionales

Resumo

The concept of identity and its reconstruction has been misplaced in the periphery of International Relations mainstream. Therefore, the rise of new powers in the international system has been analyzed from a materialistic view and usually portrayed as a threat to the stability of the whole system. In particular, China�s rise is accompanied by speeches of threat that reconstruct the otherness between China and the US in demonizing terms. Therefore, it is essential to analyze this phenomenon from theories that include identity variables to move towards the deconstruction of such dangerous speeches.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BARNETT, Michael N., “Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo” en European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5, nº 1, 1999, ps. 5-36.
  • BERGER, Peter L. y LUCKMANN, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor, New York, 1967.
  • BERNSTEIN, Richard y MUNRO, Ross H., “The Coming Conflict with America” en Foreign Affairs, nº Marzo/Abril, 1997, ps. 18-32.
  • BOOTH, Ken, “Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist” en KRAUSE, Keith y WILLIAMS, Michael C. (eds.), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases.: University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1997, ps. 83-119.
  • BOOTH, Ken (ed.), Critical security studies and world politics,Lynne Rienner, Colorado, 2005.
  • BUZAN, Barry, WÆVER, Ole y DE WILDE Jaap, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, 1998.
  • BUZAN, Barry y WÆVER, Ole, Regions and Powers: the Structure of International Security,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
  • BUZAN, Barry, “China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?” en The Chinese Journal of International Politics, nº 5, 2010, ps. 5-36.
  • CALLAHAN, William A., Contingent states: greater China and transnational relations, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2004.
  • CALLAHAN, William A., “Sino-speak: Chinese Exceptionalism and the Politics of History” en The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 71, nº 1, 2012, ps. 33-55.
  • CAMPBELL, David, Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity,University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1992.
  • CHENGXIN, Pan, “The “China Threat” in American Self-Imagination: The Discursive Construction of Other as Power Politics” en Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, nº29, 2004, ps. 305-331.
  • CLARK, Ian, “China and the United States: a succession of hegemonies?” en International Affairs 87, nº 1, 2011, ps. 13–28.
  • CROCKATT, Richard, After 9/11: Cultural dimensions of American global power, Routledge, London, 2007.
  • DUNNE, Tim, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, MacMillan, Basingstoke, 1998.
  • FENG, Zhang, “The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in International Relations” en European Journal of International Relations, nº19, 2013, ps. 305-328.
  • FIERKE, Karin M., Critical Approaches to International Security, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007.
  • FINNEMORE, Martha, “Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity. Why Being a Unipole isn’t All it’s Cracked up to Be” en Worls Politics, Vol. 61, nº 1, 2009, ps. 58-85.
  • GILPIN, Robert, War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981.
  • GILPIN, Robert, “The theory of hegemonic war”, en The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 18. nº 4, 1988.
  • GRIES, Peter H., “Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a ‘China Threat’ Inevitable?” en European Journal of International Relations, vol. 11, nº 2,2005, ps. 235–265.
  • GUZZINI, Stefano (ed.) The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises,Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
  • HAN, Dongling; CHEN, Dingding y FANG, Changping, “Images of the United States: Explaining the Attitudes of Chinese Scholars and Students in the United States” en The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 6, 2013, ps. 183-207.
  • HOPF, Ted, “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory” en International Security, vol. 23, nº 1, 1998, ps. 171-200.
  • HOPF, Ted, Social Construction of International Politics: identities & foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999, Cornell University Press, New York, 2002.
  • HUNTINGTON, Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1996.HURD, Ian, “Breaking and Meaking Norms: American Revisionism and Crisis of Legitimacy” en International Politics, nº 44, 2007, ps. 194-213.
  • JACQUES, Martin, When China Rules the World: the End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order, Penguin Press, New York, 2009.
  • KATZENSTEIN, Peter J, The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics, Columbia University Press, New York, 1996.
  • KATZENSTEIN, Peter J. y KEOHANE, Robert O. (eds.), Anti-americanism in world politics, Cornell University Press, New York, 2007.
  • LEBOW, Richard N., “Identity and International Relations” en International Relations, vol. 22, nº 5, ps. 473-492.
  • LEE, Pak K. y CHAN, Lai-Ha, “Non Traditional security Threats in China: Challenges of Energy Shortage and Infectious Diseases” en CHENG, Joseph Y. S., Challenges and Policy Programs of China’s New Leadership, City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, 2007, ps. 297-336.
  • MAY, Ernest, “Who we are?” en Foreign Affairs, vol. 73, nº 2, 1994, ps. 134-138.
  • MCDONALD, Mark, “Constructivism and Security” en WILLIAMS, Paul (ed.), Security studies: an introduction, Routledge, London, 2008, ps. 59-72.
  • MCSWEENEY, William, Security, Identity, and Interests: a Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
  • MEARSHEIMER, John J., “China’s Unpeaceful Rise” en Current history, vol. 105, nº 690, 2006, ps. 160–162.
  • MEARSHEIMER, John J., The tragedy of great power politics,W.W. Norton, New York, 2001.
  • MENGES, Constantine C. China: the gathering threat, Nelson Current, Tennessee, 2005.
  • MITZEN, Jennifer, “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma” en European Journal of International Relations, vol. 12, nº 3, 2006, ps. 341-370.
  • MOURE, Leire, Orden internacional en transición y Relaciones Internacionales: Aproximaciones teóricas al declive hegemónico estadounidense y al ascenso de China como potencia global, Cursos de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria, 15 de julio de 2013.
  • NEUMANN, Iver B., Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1999.
  • ORGANSKI, Alfred F.K., World Politics, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1965.
  • PROYECT ATLAS, “International Students in the United States”, http://www.iie.org/Services/Project-Atlas/United-States/International-Students-In-US, [Consultado el 23 de abril de 2015].
  • REUS-SMIT, Christian, “international Crisis of Legitimacy” en International Politics, nº 44, 2007, ps. 157-174.
  • SARUP, Madan, Identity, Culture and the Postmodern World, University of Georgia Press, Athens, 1996.
  • STEELE, Brett, Ontological security in international relations: self- identity and the IR state, Routledge, London, 2008.
  • SUZUKI, Shogo, “The Importance of ‘Othering’ in China’s National Identity: Sino-Japanese Relations as a Stage of Identity Conflicts” en The Pacific Review, vol. 20, nº 1, 2007, ps. 23-47.
  • TAJFEL, Henry, Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981.
  • WÆVER, Ole et al., Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1993.
  • WÆVER, Ole, “Securitization and Desecuritization” en LIPSCHUTZ, Ronnie D. (ed.), On Security,Columbia University Press, Nueva York, 1998, ps. 46-86.
  • WALTZ, Kenneth N., Teoría de la Política Internacional, GEL, Buenos Aires, 1979.
  • WELDES, Jutta, Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1999
  • WENDT, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
  • WU, Xinbo, “Forging Sino–US Partnership in the Twenty-First Century: opportunities and challenges” en Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 21, nº 75, 2012, ps. 391-407.
  • YAN, Xuetong y QI, Haixia, “Football Game Rather Than Boxing Match: China–US Intensifying Rivalry Does not Amount to Cold War” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, nº 5, 2012, ps. 105-127.
  • YI, Edward Y. y XINSHENG, Liu, “The ‘China Threat’ through the Lens of US Print Media: 1992–2006” en Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 21, nº 76, 2012, ps. 695-711.
  • YONG, Deng, China’s struggle for status: the realignment of international relations, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008.
  • ZEHFUSS, Maja, “Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liason” en GUZZINI, Stefano y LEANDER, Anna (eds.), Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics, Routledge, London, 2006, ps. 92-116.
  • ZHANG, Jiadong y ZHENG, Xin, “The Role of Nontraditional Security in China–US Relations: common ground or contradictory arena?” en Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 21, nº 76, 2012, ps. 623-636.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet