Government effectiveness, education, economic development and well-being: Analysis of european countries in comparison with the United States and Canada , 2000-2007

  1. Maria-Carmen Guisan
Revista:
Applied econometrics and international development

ISSN: 1578-4487

Ano de publicación: 2009

Volume: 9

Número: 1

Páxinas: 39-55

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Applied econometrics and international development

Resumo

In this article we present an econometric analysis of the relationship between several indicators of economic development and wellbeing in Europe, the United States and Canada. We calculate a compound index of several indicators based on three groups: 1) Life satisfaction and income per capita, 2) governance indicators based on World Bank, including Voice and Accounting Index and Government Effectiveness Index, and 3) Educational indicators, including public education expenditure per capita and average total years of schooling, The most outstanding countries in the overall index are Norway, Denmark, Sweden, the United States, Austria, Ireland, Switzerland, Canada, Finland, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. The three groups of indicators are highly correlated in several ways, due to the important positive effects of education on economic development and governance effectiveness, as well as to the positive effects of the “Voice and Accounting” index on “Governance Effectiveness”, and the importance of the latter for economic development, as it is shown in the estimated econometric models. In section 2 we present an interesting summary of main factors of economic development, based on the several selected econometric models applied to international comparisons.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bjornskow, C. (2006). “How Does Social Trust Affect Economic Growth?” Department of Economics Aarhus School of Business Working Paper 06-2..
  • Guisan, M.C. (1980). “Forecasting Employment through an Internacional Cobb-Douglas Function. An Analysis of 23 OECD Countries”. Econometric Society World Congress, Aix-en-Provence.
  • Guisan, M. C. (1997) “Economic growth and education: a new international policy”. Society for International Development, SID 22nd World Conference, series Economic Development n.18.1
  • Guisan, M.C.(2006) “Industry, Foreign Trade and Development: Econometric Models of Europe and North America, 1965-2003”, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Vol. 3-1.1
  • Guisan, M.C.(2007). “Industry, Foreign Trade and Development: Econometric Models of Africa, Asia and Latin America 1965-2003”, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Vol. 4-1.1
  • Guisan, M.C. (2008 a). “Education and World Development” (Spanish: “Educación y desarrollo mundial en 2001-2008. perspectivas de América, Europa, África y Asia” AEDE Congreso (Spanish Assocation of Economics of Education), July 2008.1
  • Guisan, M.C. (2008 b). “Quality of Government, Education and World Development: An Analysis of 132 countries, 2000-2007”, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Vol.6, special issue.1
  • Guisan, M.C., Aguayo, E. and Exposito, P. (2001a). “Economic Growth and Cycles: Crosscountry Models of education, Industry and Fertility and International Comparisons”.Applied Econometrics and International Development. Vol.1-1, pp.9-38. 1
  • Guisan, M.C., Aguayo, E. and Exposito, P.(2001b). Education and World Development in 1900- 1999. A General View and Challenges for the Near Future. Applied Econometrics and International Development Vol. 1-1, pp.101-110.1
  • Guisan, M.C. and Cancelo, M. T. (2001). Economic Development in OECD countries during the 20th century. Working Paper of the Series Economic Development, n.49, free downloadable1 .
  • Guisan, M.C. and Frias, I. (1997) “Economic growth and social welfare in the European regions”. Working Paper of the series Economic Development n.9, free downloadable.1
  • Guisan, M.C. and Neira, I. (2006). “Direct and Indirect Effects of Human Capital on World Development, 1960-2004”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol. 6-1.
  • Johnson, Z.(2008). World Freedom Atlas. Wisconsin.
  • Kaufmann D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi (2008): Governance Matters VII: Governance Indicators for 1996-2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper nº 4654. 2
  • Lee, Jong-Wha & Barro, Robert J, 2001. "Schooling Quality in a Cross-Section of Countries" Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 68(272), pages 465-488.
  • Marks, N., Simms, A., Thompson, S. and Abdallah, S. (2006). HPI Index. NEF Foundation.
  • Portela, M. and Neira, I. (2002) Capital Social: Concepto y Estudio Econométrico sobre el Capital Social en España (Spanish). Estudios Económicos de Desarrollo Internacional. Vol 2-2.
  • Sharpe, A.(1999). “A Survye of Indicators of Economic and Social Well-being”, Centre for the Study of Living Standard. Paper for the Canadian Policy Research Networks, July 22, 1999.
  • Tabellini, (2008). “Transmission of Cultural Traits across Generations”, JEEA, Vol. 6, issue 2-3.
  • Teorell, J. Holmber, S. and Rothstern,B. (2008). “The Quality of Government Dataset”, Goteborg University, http://www.q0g.pol.gu.se
  • WB (2008). World Government Indicators. World Bank: http://govindicators.org.
  • WVS(2006). World Values Survey Association: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
Fonte de datos: Dialnet