Determinación de propiedades mecánicas de Castanea sativa Mill. mediante ondas de ultrasonido y comparación con el método de compresión

  1. C. Vázquez 1
  2. R. Gonçalves 2
  3. M. Guaita 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Universidad de Campinas
Buch:
VII Congreso Ibérico de Agroingeniería y Ciencias Hortícolas: innovar y producir para el futuro. Libro de actas
  1. Ayuga Téllez, Francisco (coord.)
  2. Masaguer Rodríguez, Alberto (coord.)
  3. Mariscal Sancho, Ignacio (coord.)
  4. Villarroel Robinson, Morris (coord.)
  5. Ruiz-Altisent, Margarita (coord.)
  6. Riquelme Ballesteros, Fernando (coord.)
  7. Correa Hernando, Eva Cristina (coord.)

Verlag: Fundación General de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

ISBN: 84-695-9055-3 978-84-695-9055-3

Datum der Publikation: 2014

Seiten: 246-251

Kongress: Congreso Ibérico de Agroingeniería y Ciencias Hortícolas (7. 2013. Madrid)

Art: Konferenz-Beitrag

Zusammenfassung

Ultrasonic wave propagation is a nondestructive method for the determination of mechanical properties. As an orthotropic material, wood presents different properties according to the direction to the grain. Often, only the longitudinal Young’s modulus (EL) is determined, but many projects, using current software tools, require knowledge of the radial and tangential Young’s moduli (ER and ET), the longitudinal-radial, longitudinaltangential and radial-tangential shear moduli (GLR, GLT and GRT respectively) and the Poisson’s ratios for all planes (ν). The mechanical properties of 13 specimens of Castanea sativa from three different Spanish regions were determined. Ultrasonic results for three of the specimens were compared with results obtained by the traditional compression method for the determination of the mechanical properties of wood. The determination of all the elastic constants by compression testing on three of the specimens did not reveal significant differences between both methods for any of the constants.