Wages, productivity and human capital in the european unionEconometric models and comparison with the usa 1985-2005

  1. Maria-Carmen Guisan Seijas 1
  2. Eva Aguayo 1
  1. 1 University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Revista:
Applied econometrics and international development

ISSN: 1578-4487

Ano de publicación: 2007

Volume: 7

Número: 1

Páxinas: 43-56

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Applied econometrics and international development

Resumo

The European Union lags behind the United States both in rates of employment and real wages. This study analyzes the relationship between wages, productivity and human capital in 5 European Union countries: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, in comparison with the USA. Firstly we analyze the role of productivity in the explanation of real wages, secondly we present a comparative study of the evolution of wages and productivity during the period 1985-2005, and thirdly we estimate an econometric model which relates real wages with productivity and productivity with human capital. As measures of human capital we have included the average total years of schooling, based on Barro and Lee estimations and lagged Research expenditure per inhabitant. The main conclusion is that the European Union should develop economic policies in order to increase the support to human capital, fostering education and RD expenditure in order to achieve higher levels of real wages and higher rates of employment and to converge towards to the levels of the United States.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguayo, E. and Guisan, M.C. (2004). “Employment and Population in European Union: Econometric Models and Causality Tests” Working Paper Series Economic Development 80.*
  • Barro, R. and Lee, J.W. (2002). Statistical Appendix. Total Years of Schooling, at http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/barrolee/apendix.xls.
  • Bell, B., S. Nickell and G. Quintini, (2000) Wage Equations, Wage Curves and All That, Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers 0472.*
  • Eurostat. RD statistics. Available on line.
  • Fabiani, S. and Pellegrini, G.(1997). “Education, Infra-structure, Geography and Growth: An Empirical Analysis of the Development of Italian Provinces”. Working Paper Series of Banca Italia Servizi di Studi, n.323, Rome.*
  • Fair, R.(2004), The MCB Model Workbook, Appendix B: The Row Part of the MCB Model, update 04-10-29, at http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/main2.htm
  • Guisan, M.C.(2004). “Education, Research and Manufacturing in EU25: An Inter-Sectoral Econometric Model of 151 European Regions, 1995-2000”, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Vol.4-2, pp.21-32.*
  • Guisan, M.C.(2005a). “Employment, Wages and Immigration in the European Union: Econometric Models and Comparison with the USA, 1960-2003”, working paper series Economic Development, number 83.*
  • Guisan, M.C. (2005b). “The Role of Demand and Supply in Economic Growth and Development”, Chapter 1, in Guisan, M.C., ed. Macro-econometric Models: The Role of Demand and Supply. ICFAI Books, Hyderabad, India.
  • Guisan, M.C. (2005c). “Universities and Research Expenditure in Europe and the USA: An Analysis of Countries and Regions, 1993-2003”, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Vol. 5- 2, pp.35-46.*
  • Guisan, M.C.(2006). “Causality and Dynamic Econometric Models in Econometrics: A General Approach and the Role of the Production Function”, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Vol.3-2.1
  • Guisan, M.C. and Aguayo, E.(2004). “Employment, Population and Regional Development in Western and Central Europe. Econometric Models and Challenges of EU Enlargement”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol. 4-2.1
  • Guisan, M.C. and Aguayo, E. (2005). “Employment, Development and Research Expenditure in the European Union: Analysis of Causality and Comparison with the United States, 1993-2003”, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Vol.2-2.1
  • Guisan, M.C. and Neira, I. (2006). “Direct and Indirect Effects of Human Capital on Economic Development: A Worldwide Perspective, 1960-2004”. Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol.6-1, pp.17-34 1,2
  • Kuh, E.(1967). “A Productivity Theory of Wage Levels.An Alternative to the Phillips Curve”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 34-4, pp. 333-360.
  • Lipsey, R.G. & Parkin, J.M.(1970). “Incomes Policy: A Reappraisal”, Economica 37, pp.115-138
  • Nayman,L. and Ünal-Kesenci, D.(2001).“The French-German Productivity Comparison Revisited: Ten Years after the German Unification”. CEPII research centre, Working paper 0114, Paris.
  • OECD. Labour Force Statistics. Several years. OECD, Paris.
  • OECD. National Account Statistics. Several years. OECD, Paris.
  • Peeters, M. and den Reijer, A.(2003). “On Wage Formation, Wage Development and Flexibility: a Comparison Between European Countries and the United States”. Working Paper 108.*
  • Tondl, G.(1999). “What Determined the Uneven Growth of Europe´s Southern Regions? An Empirical Study with Panel Data”. Working Paper Series of Vienna University of Economics and the Research Group on Growth and Employment in Europe.* Available at http://ideas.repec.org