Estudio longitudinal de predictores y consecuencias del ciberacoso en adolescentes españoles

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abella, V. y Bárcena, C. (2014). PEN, Modelo de los cinco factores y problemas de conducta en la adolescencia. Acción Psicológica, 11, 55-68.
• Adachi P. y Willoughby T. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: implications for psychological science. European Journal Developmental Psychology, 12, 116-128.
• Alonso, C. y Romero, E. (2017). Aggressors and victims in bullying and cyberbullying: a study of personality profiles using the five-factor model. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, e76.
• Andreu, J. M, Peña, M. E. y Ramírez, J. M. (2009). Cuestionario de agresión reactiva y proactiva: un instrumento de medida de la agresión en adolescentes. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 14, 37-49.
• Bottino, S. M., Bottino, C. M., Regina, C. G., Correia, A. V. y Ribeiro, W. S. (2015). Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31, 463-475.
• Burton, K. A., Florell, D. y Wygant, D. B. (2013). The role of peer attachment and normative beliefs about aggression on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 103-115.
• Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D. y Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34, 613-629.
• Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L. y Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128-1135.
• Carmona-Torres, J. A., Cangas, A. J., Langer, A. I., Aguilar-Parra J. M. y Gallego, J. (2015). Acoso escolar y su relación con el de consumo de drogas y trastornos alimentarios: comparación entre adolescentes de Chile y España. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 23, 507-527.
• Çelik, S., Atak, H. y Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 129-150.
• Charalampous, K., Demetriou, C., Tricha, L., Ioannou, M., Georgiou, S., Nikiforou, M. y Stavrinides, P. (2018). The effect of parental style on bullying and cyber bullying behaviors and the mediating role of peer attachment relationships: a longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 64, 109-123.
• Clark, L. A. y Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
• Cole, D. A., Zelkowitz, R., Nick, E., Martin, N. C., Roeder, K. M., Sinclair-McBride, K. y Spinelli, T. (2016). Longitudinal and incremental relation of cybervictimization to negative self-cognitions and depressive symptoms in young adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1321-1332.
• Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. y Plichta, P. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141-147.
• Estévez, E. y Jiménez, T. I. (2015). Conducta agresiva y ajuste personal y escolar en una muestra de estudiantes adolescentes españoles. Universitas Psychologica, 14, 111- 124.
• Estévez, A., Villardón, L., Calvete, E., Padilla, P. y Orue, I. (2010). Adolescentes víctimas de cyberbullying: prevalencia y características. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 18, 73-89.
• Fairbairn, C. E., Briley, D. A., Kang, D., Fraley, R. C., Hankin, B. L. y Ariss, T. (2018). A metaanalysis of longitudinal associations between substance use and interpersonal attachment security. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 535-555.
• Field, M. y Powell, H. (2007). Stress increases attentional bias for alcohol cues in social drinkers who drink to cope. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 42, 560-566.
• Fisher, B. W., Gardella, J. H. y Teurbe-Tolon, A. R. (2016). Peer cybervictimization among adolescents and the associated internalizing and extern
• alizing problems: a meta- Analysis. Journal Youth Adolescence, 45, 1727-1743. Fite, P. J., Colder, C. R., Lochman, J. E. y Wells, K. C. (2007). Pathways from proactive and reactive aggression to substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 355-364.
• Fonagy, P., Leigh, T., Steele, M., Steele, H., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G. y Gerber A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 22-31.
• Frison, E., Subrahmanyam, K. y Eggermon, S. (2016). The short-term longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between peer victimization on Facebook and adolescents’ wellbeing. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45, 1755-1771.
• Gámez-Guadix, M. y Gini, G. (2016). Individual and class justification of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration: a longitudinal analysis among adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 81-89.
• Gámez-Guadix, M., Orue, I., Smith P. K. y Calvete, E. (2013). Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 446-452.
• Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: una revisión. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 233-254.
• García, L., Orellana, O., Pomalaya, R., Yanac, E., Sotelo, L. y Sotelo, N. (2010). Ciberbullying en escolares de educación secundaria de Lima Metropolitana. Revista de investigación en Psicología, 13, 83-99.
• Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., Luengo, M. A. y Romero, E. (2002). Prevención del consumo de drogas en la escuela: cuatro años de seguimiento de un programa. Psicothema, 14, 685-692.
• Griffin, D. y Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430-445.
• Hinduja, S. y Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206-221.
• Hoff, D. L. y Mitchel, S. N. (2009). Cyberbullying: causes, effects and remedies. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 652-655.
• Luengo, M. A., Otero, J. M., Mirón, L. y Romero, E. (1995). Análisis psicosocial del consumo de drogas en los adolescentes gallegos. Santiago: Xunta de Galicia.
• Machinbarrena, J. M. y Garaigordobil, M. (2018). Acoso y ciberacoso en educación primaria. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 26, 263-280.
• Machmutow, K., Perren, S., Sticca, F. y Alsaker, F. D. (2012). Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 403-420.
• Magaz, A. M., Chorot, P., Sandín, B., Santed, M. A. y Valiente, R. M. (2011). Estilos de apego y acoso entre iguales (bullying) en adolescentes. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 16, 207-221.
• McAdams, D. P. y Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-21.
• McCrae, R. R. y Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
• McCrae, R. R. y Costa, P. T. (2008). The Five Factor Theory of personality. En O. P. John, R. W. Robins y L. A. Pervin (dirs.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3ª ed., pp. 157-180). Nueva York, NY: Guilford.
• McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23, 412-433.
• Nikiforou, M., Georgiou, St. y Stavrinides, P. (2013). Attachment to parents and peers as a parameter of bullying and victimization. Journal of Criminology, 1, 1-9.
• Ortega-Ruiz, R., Del Rey, R. y Casas, J. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q. Psicología Educativa, 22, 71-79.
• Ortet, G., Ibañez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Viruela, A. y Mezquita, L. (2012). Assessing the five factor of personality in adolescents: the junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 19, 114-130.
• Pabian, S. y Vandebosch, H. (2016). Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents’ (cyber)bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 162-172.
• Patchin, J. W. y Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148-169.
• Peluchette J. V., Karl K., Wood C. y Williams J. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization: do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 424-435.
• Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, Stouthamer-Loeber, M. y Liu, J. (2006). The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159-171.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Sandín, B., Chorot, R, Lostao, L., Joiner, T. E., Santed, M. A. y Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11, 37-51.
• Scharfe, E. (1999). Una comparación de auto-informe y clasificaciones de la entrevista de apego. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365.
• Selig, J. P. y Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. En B. Laursen, T. D. Little y N. A. Card (dirs.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265-278). Nueva York, NY: Guilford. Sharma, S. y Agarwala, S. (2015). Self-esteem and collective self-esteem among adolescents: an interventional approach. Psychological Thought, 8, 105-113.
• Shetgiri, R., Lin, H., Avila, R. M. y Flores, G. (2012). Parental characteristics associated with bullying perpetration in us children aged 10 to 17 years. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2280-2286.
• Smith P. K. y Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying. Childhood, 7, 193- 212.
• Smith, P. K. (2015). The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 15, 176-184.
• Spriggs, A. L., Iannotti, R. J., Nansel, T. R. y Haynie, D. R. (2007). Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 283-293.
• Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F. y Perrem, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 52-67.
• Tharp-Taylor, S., Haviland, A. y D’Amico, E. J. (2009). Victimization from mental and physical bullying and substance use in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 561- 567.
• Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization among schoolchildren and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 186-199.
• Van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Toprak, F. y Vedder, P. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the big five, dark triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 231-235.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A. y Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
• Wilson, K., Gullone, E. y Moss, S. (1998). The youth version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: a psychometric validation. Behaviour Change, 15, 187-193.
• Wright, W., Barry, M., Hughes, E., Trepel, D., Ali, S., Allgar, V. , Cottrill, L., Duffy, S., Fell, J., Glanville, J., Glaser, D., Hackney, L., Manea, L., McMillan, D., Palmer, S., Prior, V., Whitton, C., Perry, A. y Gilbody, S. (2015). Clinical and cost effectiveness of parenting interventions for children with ‘severe attachment problems’: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Technology Assessment, 19, 1-348.
• Wright, M. F. y Li, Y. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: the moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 662-674.
• Ybarra, M. y Mitchell, K. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver chid relationships, internet use and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 2, 319- 336.
• Zhou, Y., Zheng, W. y Gao, X. (2018). The relationship between the big five and cyberbullying among college students: the mediating effect of moral disengagement. Current Psychology, 38, 1162-1173.